<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Let's look at this from a logic standpoint. <div>1) We limit the duty cycle to decrease the rpm. Lower duty cycle means lower average voltage, therefore lower rpm. RPM= Kv*V</div><div>2) Let's say we cut the voltage and therefore the rpm in half. The power to turn the prop required would be much less than half because power varies with the cube of rpm.</div><div>3) Therefore, if power is reduced by more than half the current will be reduced as well as the voltage.</div><div><br></div><div>In our modern day speed controllers the current through the motor does not go full on/full off with the duty cycle but remains relatively constant through the cycle due to the ESC design and motor characteristics. The peak current during the on portion of the cycle is lower than the current at 100% duty cycle. Limiting duty cycle does reduce the current and the power consumption. Does it limit power dissipation in the ESC? That is another question.</div><div><br></div><div>Jim O</div><div><br><div><div>On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Peter Vogel wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">potentially, yes. The most efficient running of the ESC is WOT. An electric motor is a constant speed system, it will draw whatever amps it needs in order to spin at the speed defined by the kV * received voltage for however long it receives voltage. The motor will pull the amps it wants to during each pulse from the ESC. That'll obviously depend on all kinds of factors including the weight + size of the prop, whether you are in an up or downline, etc.<div>
<br></div><div>Peter+<br><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:45 PM, James Oddino <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joddino@socal.rr.com">joddino@socal.rr.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Can you elaborate? Are you saying more current flows at lower duty cycle than it does when the FETs are full on at high throttle?<br>
<br>
Jim O<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Peter Vogel wrote:<br>
<br>
> Limiting throttle does NOT limit current to the motor, in fact, it can cause higher current draw. All throttle does is vary the on vs off cycle during which voltage is sent to the motor.<br>
><br>
> Peter+<br>
><br>
> Sent from my iPhone4S<br>
><br>
><br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training</div><div>Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark</div><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg"><br>
<br>
</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>