Taking a lesson from our former CEO (Steve Bennett, protege of Jack Welch) -- whenever there's a heated argument about a proposal, it is very rarely the proposal itself that is the source of the argument, rather, what people are disagreeing about is WHAT they are solving for (the "big Y") and the dozen or so variables their perspective believes influence the Y (the little X's) -- if you can agree on the big Y before you even start talking about the little X's you think will move the lever and then share your knowledge that leads to the things you think will move the needle and everyone else does the same, then there is rarely argument and you will reach a shared understanding of the tactics and strategy that will move you forward. And, of course, all the Big Y's are in pursuit of "True North" which is what the organization as a whole exists to achieve (in the case of a company, it can be as simple as "maximum return for shareholders" in the case of the company I work for it's Best-in-class results for all three stakeholders (shareholders, customers, employees). <div>
<br></div><div>So, let's start with the NSRCA itself, why do we exist, and what are we solving for? I think I heard someone say "to support US participation in international competition" -- I'll go with that one for a moment...</div>
<div><br></div><div>Last I checked, FAI-level performance doesn't reside latent in the fetus waiting to be activated when a child first touches the sticks on a transmitter and delivers a phenom-level performance. It might happen, but I believe even Andrew Jesky spent over a decade in pursuit of the goal of winning the precision competition at Tucson and similarly in pursuit of a slot on the US world F3A team... In short, talent is developed -- that means brought up through progressive levels of competition where a decent showing is possible for the person's current skill level, or at least that they feel they are making progress toward a successful showing. If taking home wood isn't a least a back-of-the-mind goal in the lower levels, that's a rare circumstance (I admit, for me the starting goal was to not get all zeroes and to improve my overall flying -- but I've been bitten by the competitive bug and now I *want* to do well, though I recognize I'm still probably years away from being near the top of the podium in sportsman given limitations on the amount of practice I can fit into my life). </div>
<div><br></div><div>So, proposed Big Y number 1 -- Promote and Support classes that allow talent to be identified and developed to ultimately lead to success in FAI. -- Probably needs some word smithing, but I think it adequately explains why 401, etc. exist. In any well-formed development program, you want to see a strong funnel of "newbies" coming in to the bottom classes while people "leak" in the boundaries between classes for various reasons (hitting a talent plateau, discovering the opposite sex, lack of funds, other commitments more important, lack/loss of practice facilities, etc.) Some leakage is organic and unavoidable, other leakage is manageable, some is reversable (i.e. many people come back to the hobby after the, to quote Inga from <i>Young Frankenstein</i>, "Sweet Mystery of Life", is no longer shiny and new, still fun, but not the only thing to live for). Controlling the controllable leakage would be one of the X's to solve for here, as would the "development" of talent (read: training and coaching that goes beyond the high-wing trainer) and, arguably most importantly, bringing new blood into the lower classes.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I think a lot of the weight argument relates to a lack of clarity about what we were solving for with that proposal:</div><div> Some think it relates to making the lower classes more accessible -- I'm willing to buy that, to a point, in that getting a 2m bird to make weight can be challenging and expensive, creating a barrier to entry into the lower classes. (as you progress through the classes, the possibility of sponsorships, etc. increase, making cost less of a concern -- I'll talk about sponsorship later...) But the argument can be made that at the lower classes you are actually probably a lot less willing to put an expensive 2m 11lb (or 11+lb) plane at risk and so you'll "fly what you brung" which is probably a smaller plane (47" Osiris, 48" Vanquish, 62" Osiris, Wind50, hand-me-down Kaos, etc.) where making weight isn't even a vague concern.</div>
<div> Some think it relates to aligning ourselves with the international community -- I believe that was even one of the reasons for the change documented in the proposal, someone did the research and found that a number of other countries' development classes allow for 5500 grams (which is only a 10% variance from the FAI standard) and, I believe, there was/is some evidence for higher development class participation in those countries than in the US. We all know correlation is not causation, so whether the increased weight limit is the reason for the higher participation or whether there are other environmental factors (i.e. BMFA's 'B' and 'C' certificate training programs that take people beyond flying a circuit with a high wing trainer) is obviously debatable.</div>
<div><br></div><div>When I voted yes on the weight issue I did so in full knowledge that we already have a 115g allowance in Intermediate and Advanced as well as a "fly what you brung" convention in sportsman. My thinking was that in today's global community, people move from country to country a lot (as director of training at my local field I recently signed off two recent european transplants to fly solo at our field, my brother and his family have lived in Indonesia and the UK for most of my nephew's lives, having only just now returned to the states after 16 years as expats) and so we make it easier for people who may have competed at their equivalent of Intermediate and Advanced or Masters to compete in US competitions with the planes they moved with them. I saw no likely harm in the change because there's plenty of incentive to "keep it light" to improve the flying characteristics (except in the windiest conditions), the other restrictions regarding size, voltage, and sound create further barriers to significant weight increase if you want to be competitive. So for people who, like me, read the rules carefully before getting into competition (My AMA# was on the right wing at my first competition, no one had to tell me I needed it) the weight will be one less barrier to considering competition. I also thought it would encourage a degree of "casual" competitors for whom pattern is not the end-all-be-all of their participation in RC but they have a self-designed bird that competes well but isn't a classic pattern ship. "casual" competition at the local level is, I believe, part of what it takes to create the "critical mass" that makes a competition viable for the club to host, and for participants to feel that the sport isn't dying off (similar to church attendance, there's a certain level above which growth is easier because people believe in the viability of the church). In short, I saw several positives and no negatives to the change, so I voted yes. Does it mean I'm going to go out and campaign a 5500g plane? No, it's not going to change what I do -- my Vanquish makes weight easily and will continue to do so even if I have to repair the LG 3 more times and I expect the 2M Osiris will be similar when I get it later this summer.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I promised I'd talk about sponsorship -- this is peripheral to the weight issue, but something the NSRCA should think about if development of talent within pattern is truly something we believe we should be solving for -- I know there are some sponsored pilots here in D7, but it is my impression that they are sponsored because they rose in the ranks at a time when 3D didn't exist and so pattern carried the "WOW" and was one of the premier competition classes in the US. I don't think I've ever seen, at least here in D7, a manufacturer rep (as opposed to sponsored pilot) at a pattern event, that says to me that pattern at the local level, at least, isn't a "feeder" for manufacturers to find local pilots to represent their brand well at their club field or local competitions. Contrast that with any local huckfest or strongly attended fun fly (which is mostly 3D stuff and foam wing combat these days) and you'll see at least one other reason that I think we don't draw the new blood that pattern probably once did. I "grew up" watching the pattern guys and their tuned pipes and fast birds (mostly in magazines since I lived in backwater Los Alamos, NM until I was in college in TX) and they were almost gods to me with their JR and Futaba shirts. Where's the sponsor talent (which includes piloting, but also helping others with their setups, coaching, etc. talent) identification in pattern these days? If pattern were *visibly* supported by the manufacturers more, I think we'd also see an influx to our branch of the hobby.</div>
<div><br></div><div>'Nuff said.</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Scott McHarg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scmcharg@gmail.com">scmcharg@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Jim,<br> I have absolutely no answer for you. As an offlist discussion between you and I, personally I feel 5500g is too much. When we went to the BoD and voted, I honestly and sincerely thought the board was going to turn it down. I would be very happy at 5200-5300g across the board. I did not expect 5500g to pass the board 9 to 1. The committee felt as a whole that 5500g should be stuck to and take to the board as written based on the survey results. There isn't one person to blame at all. I just felt it was a little too high. Honestly, I don't think there's a snowball's chance in heck that it goes through the AMA. I hope there is some compromise between what Joe L. proposed and we proposed.<br>
<br>Regards,<br>Scott<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:56 AM, J N Hiller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jnhiller@earthlink.net" target="_blank">jnhiller@earthlink.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="blue" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><font color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">Why not
just apply the existing 115g allowance to masters also.<u></u><u></u></span></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><font color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">Jim H<u></u><u></u></span></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><font color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"><u></u> <u></u><u></u><u></u></span></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><font color="navy" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"><u></u> <u></u><u></u><u></u></span></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"></span></font></p><div><font color="black" face="Tahoma">-----Original
Message-----<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span></b> <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>]<b><span style="font-weight:bold">On Behalf Of </span></b>Scott McHarg<br>
</font></div><div><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><b><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:45
AM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> General pattern discussion<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Rules Proposals</font></div><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Through Advanced but there are others out
there that would compete in Masters who can't because of said limitation. </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">On Tue, Mar
13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dave Lockhart <<a href="mailto:DaveL322@comcast.net" target="_blank">DaveL322@comcast.net</a>>
wrote:</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc .75pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">
</span></font></p><div link="blue" vlink="purple"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial">Ummm….we did ease the weight limit by 115
grams?</font></div><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">Regards,</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"><br>
Dave L</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><b><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">From:</span></font></b><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"> <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b><span style="font-weight:bold">On Behalf Of </span></b>Ronald Van Putte<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, March 13, 2012
10:39 AM</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> General pattern discussion<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Rules Proposals</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div></div>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc .75pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">For me, it is
my reluctance to have what I do driven by someone outside our country. If
we think something is a good idea, we should do it and not worry about whether
it is within FAI rules. Precious few of us will ever compete on the world
stage and I don't think the world should influence what we do. </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">The
"world" doesn't even comply with FAI rules. The FAI rules give
a 1% allowance to physical limits because the measuring equipment
"might" be in error, no matter how accurate the equipment is.
So, the real FAI limits are 5050 grams, 2.02 meter and even 42.42 volts.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">The top
pilots don't have any problem meeting 5050 grams, 2.02 meters and 42.42 volts,
so changing our weight rules won't have any effect on the top pilots' success
on the world stage. However, easing the weight limits would have a
dramatic effect on many lower class pilots.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Ron Van Putte</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">On Mar 13,
2012, at 9:10 AM, Anthony Romano wrote:</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">So if
FAI drives pattern, why do we want to change the weight rule in the US?<br>
<br>
Anthony<br>
</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;text-align:center;border:none;padding:0in" align="center"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">Date:
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:49:14 -0500<br>
From: <a href="mailto:scmcharg@gmail.com" target="_blank">scmcharg@gmail.com</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></span></font></p><div><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals<br>
<br></font></div><div><div><font color="black" face="Tahoma">
Bob,<br>
I think one thing that everyone is either dismissing or not
considering is this: Pattern is not driven by AMA classes. Pattern
is strictly driven by FAI as FAI is worldwide. If a manufacturer were to
develop new technology for the United States AMA class, they would essentially
exclude themselves from the rest of the pattern market worldwide. No
manufacturer is going to take advantage of a rule that only effects the AMA
classes. If FAI ever decides to change the rules, that's when you will
see a change to pattern as a whole. Granted, the US is different in that
FAI is not "the only" destination class. In the rest of the
world, you are nobody if you are flying the development classes and
"may" become somebody once you are in FAI. The rest of the
world "awards" the ability to fly in FAI. You don't just
randomly decide to go fly it. You must earn that right. So,
basically new technology is not going to be developed because of an AMA-only
rules change. AMA has essentially stuck by what FAI has done always as
the thought process was everyone wanted to make it to FAI. That's no so
much the case any more. Dave Lockhart even said in an email to us all
that flat out, FAI (or the top guys) drive what even the beginners do and buy
and try (simply paraphrased). That tells us even more so that this would
not change the face of pattern. Sure, there's going to be some
extraordinary people here in the US that have the desire to try new things to
take advantage of the weight rule. Will it so severely impact pattern
that more change will be necessary? Doubtful.<br>
<br>
Just a thought and hopefully to get y'all thinking about that facet as well.<br>
<br>
With a due respect,<br>
Scott</font></div></div><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font><p></p><div><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">On
Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Bob Richards <<a href="mailto:bob@toprudder.com" target="_blank">bob@toprudder.com</a>> wrote:</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div></div></div><div><div>
<table style="width:428.7pt;margin-left:40.8pt" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="572">
<tbody><tr>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Dave,</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">That shows how much I have been paying attention. I thought all
AMA classes were limited to 5kg now. With the 115 gram allowance, I don't see
the need for a change. But I still don't see why people are getting so heated
up over it.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">You do bring up a good point about the 4S rule, though. We keep
reacting to technology with new rules, and the technology keeps reacting to
the rules with new equipment. I guess it is a part of competition that we
have to learn to accept. If we accept it, then maybe we can get out of this
reactionary cycle.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Back when they removed the displacement limit, I figured that it
would make the engines less expensive. I was wrong. But I also predicted that
the weight would then become the limiting factor and the airframe expense
would go up. Generally, I think I was right with that one.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Every time someone suggested that a rules change would result in
less expense, it probably hasn't and in fact may have cause more expense in
the long run. In fact, I think your earlier statement about every rules
change to increase size/weight limits having resulted in more expensive
models is generally accurate. I would not have thought so 10 years ago, but I
guess history has taught us that lesson.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">One can argue that leaving the size/weight rules alone can
actually decrease the cost. In the manufacturer's eyes, a rules change will
obsolete existing equipment. Think about it - in most cases the manufacturers
will change their designs to try to take advantage of the rules. They will
have to spend more of their money bring new products to the market - an
expense that is passed on to the pilot. If they could stop shooting at
a moving target they might start trying to recoup their cost over lots of
1000 instead of lots of 100. Maybe. I just hope the domestic
manufacturers figure that out before China does. :-)</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Bob R.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
--- On <b><span style="font-weight:bold">Mon, 3/12/12, Dave
Lockhart <i><span style="font-style:italic"><<a href="mailto:DaveL322@comcast.net" target="_blank">DaveL322@comcast.net</a>></span></i></span></b> wrote:</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010ff 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
From: Dave Lockhart <<a href="mailto:DaveL322@comcast.net" target="_blank">DaveL322@comcast.net</a>></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">To: "'General pattern discussion'" <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Date: Monday, March 12, 2012, 6:59 PM</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">The proposed weight change is for all AMA classes.
We already have an allowance of 115 grams for hand-me-downs…..if that is an
important aspect, then why not make it 5615 grams for Advanced, Intermediate,
and Sportsman?</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">“</span></font><font color="black"><span>The fact is that the proposed rule does not exclude any planes
that are already legal.”</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">And the fact is that the 120 4C rule did not exclude 60
2C….but they rapidly became uncompetitive once the competition variety 4Cs
were developed.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">I see the electric vs glow aspect a completely moot
point…..it will all be electric (or close to it) soon enough….even with rules
that many feel are biased against electric.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">Having the weight limit on the books, and checking it at
the NATs is what keeps the playing field level. Same as having a noise
rule keeps the planes quiet, even if it not checked locally.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span> <br>
</span></font><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d">Regards,</span></font><font color="black"><span> <br>
</span></font><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"><br>
Dave L</span></font><font color="black"><span> <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></font><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span> <br>
</span></font><font color="#1f497d" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#1f497d"> </span></font><font color="black"><span> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><b><font color="black" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold">From:</span></font></b><font color="black" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b><span style="font-weight:bold">On Behalf Of </span></b>Bob Richards<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b> Sunday, March 11,
2012 1:22 PM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> General pattern
discussion<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div>
<table style="margin-left:3.75pt" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr>
<td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Guys,</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">For the life of me, I can't see why
everyone is getting bent out of shape over the proposed weight limt
rule for the lower classes. It opens up the possibilities for someone
wanting to get started in pattern and competing in the lower classes,
IMHO. If someone in the upper classes has a plane that is at the
weight limit, but is unable to repair the plane without it going over the
limit, then it becomes a perfect hand-me-down for someone getting
started. </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">The fact is that the proposed
rule does not exclude any planes that are already legal. The guys that
build light know they should have a better flying plane than one that is
heavier. The only reason I can think of that people with light planes can
get upset with this rule is that someone with a heavier plane might beat
them. </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">OTOH, how often are models weighed at
local contests? I never saw it done in the years I flew, but that was
before the electrics came on the scene. Tell me, does any CD weigh planes
at a local event now? If not, then I am really confused about weight limit
discussions where someone says it is ruining things to raise the weight
limit, when no one is checking it at local contests anyway. Why all the
fuss (one way or the other) about a rule that no one enforces except at the
Nats?</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">I really don't have a dog in this
hunt. I'm just confused about all the strongly worded comments going back
and forth. This, IMHO, does more to turn people off from pattern than any
rule change proposal.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Bob R.</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010ff 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Arial"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----</span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion%40lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<u></u><br>
<u></u></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc .75pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
</span></font><b><font color="#3333ff" face="Comic Sans MS" size="4"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:#3333ff;font-weight:bold">Scott A. McHarg</span></font></b><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
list <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Tahoma"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:40.8pt;border:none;padding:0in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</div></div></div><span><font color="#888888">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in"><font color="black" face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
</span></font><b><font color="#3333ff" face="Comic Sans MS" size="4"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:#3333ff;font-weight:bold">Scott A. McHarg</span></font></b><font color="black"><span><u></u><u></u></span></font></p>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><b style="color:rgb(51,51,255)"><font style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif" size="4">Scott A. McHarg</font></b><br>
<br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training</div>
<div>Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark</div><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg"><br><br>
</div>