<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    It really looks like 2 proposals were supported by the group that
    voted, and 2 proposals were pretty much 50/50&nbsp; I would defer to a
    statistician to determine if the slight margin has any statistical
    significance.&nbsp; I know it doesn't on one and doubt it does on the
    other. &nbsp; Does the NSRCA really want to support (and therefore likely
    have passed) 2 proposals that if 1 person voted the other way on one
    and 4 people voted the other way on the other would have resulted in
    a majority voting against?<br>
    <br>
    I strongly urge the powers that be take a closer look at these two
    proposals before "pushing" them through on half the voters that
    didn't want them.&nbsp; The results are too close to say that "we" are in
    favor of them.<br>
    <br>
    Stuart Chale<br>
    <br>
    On 3/8/2012 3:50 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CALDH1UpiEk-zLUYcZkPX64AjQY+neK74YeDUHUAYrnKaFfiTWQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite"><span
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;display:inline!important;font-weight:normal;float:none;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px">Hello,</span>
      <div
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px">&nbsp;
        &nbsp;As promised, here are the raw results of the survey. &nbsp;107
        unique individuals took the survey. &nbsp;Individuals that felt it
        necessary to vote multiple times had their responses deleted and
        only their original answers accepted. &nbsp;Based, in part, to Dean
        Pappas' post on RCU and through the comments listed there,
        through email, phone conversation, discussion on this list and
        in person, the Safety Proposal was adjusted to the "What"
        instead of the "How". &nbsp;The new Safety Proposal will be posted
        shortly on the NSRCA website. &nbsp;The NSRCA BoD met last night to
        vote on these candidate proposals. &nbsp;The original Safety proposal
        was taken off the table (the one that you saw in the survey) and
        the new proposal was then voted on. &nbsp;Based on survey results,
        District VP interaction with his constituents and posts on RCU
        as well as this NSRCA discussion list, the BoD unanimously
        passed the new Safety Proposal, the Class Advancement as well as
        the Telemetry proposal for submittal to the AMA Rules Committee.
        &nbsp;The Weight proposal also passed with a vote of 9 to 1. &nbsp;</div>
      <div
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px"><br>
      </div>
      <div
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px">&nbsp;
        &nbsp;We would like to thank those of you who took the survey and
        appreciate not only the time that it took for you to fill out
        the survey, but your dedication to this hobby. &nbsp;The Rules
        Proposals will now be sent to the AMA for further review and
        discussion.&nbsp; Attached are the survey results both in raw (all
        members) and NSRCA members only form.&nbsp; I have also attached all
        four of the proposals again (with the new Safety Proposal) for
        your consumption.<br>
      </div>
      <div
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px"><br>
      </div>
      <div
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px">Thank
        you again,</div>
      <div
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;text-transform:none;font-size:12px;white-space:normal;font-family:Arial;word-spacing:0px">Scott</div>
      <br clear="all">
      <br>
      -- <br>
      <b style="color:rgb(51,51,255)"><font style="font-family:comic
          sans ms,sans-serif" size="4">Scott A. McHarg</font></b><br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a>
</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <p class="" avgcert""="" color="#000000" align="left">No virus
        found in this message.<br>
        Checked by AVG - <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a><br>
        Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4858 - Release Date:
        03/08/12</p>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>