<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>The rule likely needs an update to verbage that is consistent with current technology, but as long as there is no closed loop on any of the telemetry it is well within the "spirit" of the rule to use/allow these systems in pattern...<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Peter Vogel <vogel.peter@gmail.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> "nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Fri, November 18, 2011 4:20:02 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [NSRCA-discussion] No telemetry rule & new radio systems<BR></FONT><BR>I was just reading RCM&E (one of my favorite magazines) and noticed that the latest systems from Graupner and Hitec have telemetry built-in to all RX's, I suspect the others aren't far behind. With the current rule against any form of downlink from the aircraft, it seems the newer systems will be out of reach to those competing in pattern aerobatics. I'm just in sportsman, any thought to relaxing the rule to restricting telemetry that might actually be an advantage in competition as opposed to things
that can save an airframe like battery voltage data?<BR><BR>Peter+<BR><BR>Sent from my iPhone4S<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR></DIV></DIV></div></body></html>