<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18975"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>A charger with AC/DC capability is handy however, they are typically used
for the lower cell count chargers. Once you get up to about 4 cells, the
power input requirements usually drive the manufactures to use an external DC
power supply. Probably to reduce the charger footprint and cooling
requirements of the higher DC loads.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Don</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 12/8/2010 10:03:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
rharn@carolina.rr.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT size=4 face=Arial><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">I have noticed some differences in
power supplies. Any preferences?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT size=4 face=Arial><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">I also saw that 2 of the chargers
could be used either AC or DC? Advantages seem obvious, am I missing
something?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>