<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Matt,<br>
    <br>
    What are you using for an algorithm&nbsp; to get these numbers? Based on
    the fact that they are all below 1000, I assume that a judge who is
    10% higher than the average gets the same score as one who is 10%
    low. I suggest that adding a plus or minus to the judge score would
    identify which side of the curve a particular judge is on. Also,
    does a 900 imply that the judge has a 10% deviation from the norm?
    Thus if the average score is 8.0, then a judge with a 900 is giving
    a score of 7.2 or 8.8? That would indicate a 750 judge is giving
    sixes when the rest of the world is giving eights.<br>
    <br>
    John<br>
    <br>
    On 9/18/2010 12:17 PM, Dave Burton wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:004201cb575d$ba376a40$2ea63ec0$@net"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0in;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="Section1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
            &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: rgb(31,
            73, 125);">All of this stuff was done while I was away from
            pattern for a
            few years, so help me understand how this information is
            used. What do high
            ranking judges get out of the system besides an attaboy?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
            &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: rgb(31,
            73, 125);">How is it used by CDs, event directors, pilots,
            etc?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
            &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: rgb(31,
            73, 125);">Is anyone paying attention to it?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
            &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: rgb(31,
            73, 125);">Who/how provides input into the system?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
            &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: rgb(31,
            73, 125);">Thanks, Dave<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family:
            &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: rgb(31,
            73, 125);"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
        <div style="border-right: medium none; border-width: 1pt medium
          medium; border-style: solid none none; border-color: rgb(181,
          196, 223) -moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color; padding:
          3pt 0in 0in;">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt;
                font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">From:</span></b><span
              style="font-size: 10pt; font-family:
              &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>
              [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b>On
                Behalf Of </b><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rcmaster199@aol.com">rcmaster199@aol.com</a><br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM<br>
              <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2009
              Masters Final<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">Jon,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">That is correct...each of the scores for
              each
              judge&nbsp;represents how that judge performed the job (of
              judging) compared to
              the other judges. You can read the explenation of how the
              system works in the
              NSRCA website under the Judging section.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">Scoring a 900 or higher is a big deal in
              this system. It means
              that these judges placed each of the pilots very close to
              where the pilots
              ended up PLUS scored each of the pilots with minimal
              deviation from the pilots
              average score, ie- the score the pilot received for his
              round. Often, a judge
              scores well in one of the two categories but very seldon
              does a judge score
              well in both. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">The program does not look at each
              individual maneuver score; it
              looks at the total raw score. Formulas could be created to
              look at each
              maneuver but we decided (the Judge Ranking team) not to do
              it that way.&nbsp;In
              our view it would have been unecessarily complex.&nbsp;I
              seriously doubt
              that&nbsp;a more sophisticated program would produce a more
              accurate result.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">The "throwaways" Ron is talking about are
              Judge scores
              that are not high enough to be counted in overall
              rankings. Only the best 8
              scores over a span of&nbsp;5 years I believe, count in ranking
              the Judges<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;
              font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;
              color: black;">MattK<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt;">-----Original
          Message-----<br>
          From: Ron Van Putte <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">&lt;vanputte@cox.net&gt;</a><br>
          To: General pattern discussion
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">&lt;nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org&gt;</a><br>
          Sent: Sat, Sep 18, 2010 9:13 am<br>
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2009 Masters Final<o:p></o:p></p>
        <div id="AOLMsgPart_0_39e9d280-33a4-4c90-aefa-bb7eaeb326b0">
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="background: none repeat scroll 0%
            0% white;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family:
              &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: black;">The
              ranking system is not
              perfect.&nbsp;<br>
              &nbsp;<br>
              Sure we'd like a larger sample size, but I don't know
              anywhere that has more
              than five judges.&nbsp;<br>
              &nbsp;<br>
              Second, a judge's score is dependent on the other judges.
              If a judge does a
              good job in a group of good judges, his scores will be
              high. However, if a
              judge does just as well in a group of less qualified
              judges, his scores will be
              lower. That's why judges have "throwaways" in the overall
              judge
              rankings.&nbsp;<br>
              &nbsp;<br>
              Ron&nbsp;<br>
              &nbsp;<br>
              On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Jon Lowe wrote:&nbsp;<br>
              &nbsp;<br>
              &gt; Thanks Ron. I guess the two columns are from the two
              rounds we &gt; judged
              in 2009. I think the inconsistency shown is representative
              &gt; of the
              conditions in which my group was judging. 20-25 mph winds,
              &gt; colder than a
              .... And not to be disrespectful to the flyers that &gt;
              day under very
              difficult conditions, but the flying was also all &gt;
              over the map; I remember
              seeing some 8.5's or 9's, followed by a &gt; series of 5's
              and 6's. Clearly
              shows the need for a larger sample &gt; size, but I'm not
              sure we will get it,
              using only judging from Nats &gt; finals. I did not judge
              Masters finals this
              year (was supposed to &gt; do FAI, but got rained out).&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; Jon Lowe&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; -----Original Message-----&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; From: Ron Van Putte &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">vanputte@cox.net</a>&gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; To: General pattern discussion &lt;<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>&gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; Sent: Sat, Sep 18, 2010 8:32 am&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2009
              Masters Final&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; Perhaps it's time to reprint an explanation of the
              NSRCA judge &gt;
              ranking system. Judges are ranked based on how they
              compared in &gt; scoring
              pilots relative to the judging group they were in and in
              &gt; their relative
              placing of all pilots, also compared to the judging &gt;
              group they were in. A
              perfect score of 1000 means that a judge &gt; agreed with
              the scores and
              placins of the judging group.&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; Ron Van Putte&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Jon Lowe wrote:&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; I have no clue what is being presented here.
              What does this
              mean?&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Jon Lowe&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; -----Original Message-----&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:rcmaster199@aol.com">rcmaster199@aol.com</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 10:45 pm&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2009
              Masters Final&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Judge Rankings from 2009 Masters Final. Belated
              information for &gt;
              &gt; inquiring minds; This will be on the NSRCA website at
              some point, &gt;
              &gt; as I complete the assessment:&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Judge: Scores&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; R Lewis 879.0 875.2&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; G Miller 824.3 804.2&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; J Lowe 720.8 861.4&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; T Romano 778.9 946.0&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; M Hunt 757.1 769.8&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; B Clemmons 903.8 785.1&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; J Dunnaway 783.7 816.8&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; J Lechowski 787.3 843.1&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; RVP 877.2 781.3&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; T Terrenoiser 884.6 866.9&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Note: First 5 judges judged rounds 1 and 2; the
              last 5, rounds 3 &gt;
              and 4&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; Regards,&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; MattK&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; =&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________
              NSRCA-discussion &gt;
              &gt; mailing list <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://">http://</a>&gt; &gt;
              lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; NSRCA-discussion mailing list&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
                target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt;&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; _______________________________________________&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; NSRCA-discussion mailing list&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
                target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; _______________________________________________&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; NSRCA-discussion mailing list&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
                target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a>&nbsp;<br>
              &nbsp;<br>
              _______________________________________________&nbsp;<br>
              NSRCA-discussion mailing list&nbsp;<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>&nbsp;<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"
                target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family:
            &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">No virus
            found in this incoming message.<br>
            Checked by AVG - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a><br>
            Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3142 - Release
            Date: 09/18/10
            02:34:00</span><o:p></o:p></p>
      </div>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>