<font color='black' size='2' face='Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif'>Na<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">h, you've got the units all wrong. Furlongs per fortnight is a much better unit!</span><br>
<br>
<div style="clear:both"><font color="black" size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="black" face="arial" size="2">Jon Lowe</font></font></div>
<br>
<br>
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte@cox.net><br>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 7:30 pm<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers<br>
<br>
<div id="AOLMsgPart_0_d0fbe93b-e722-40c8-a0f8-db13f53d23c7" style="margin: 0px;font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif;font-size: 12px;color: #000;background-color: #fff;">
Yeah. Ground speed too in knots and MPH, please. Also, please don't forget the apparent Coriolis acceleration. <br>
<br>
Ron <br>
<br>
On Sep 8, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Earl Haury wrote: <br>
<br>
> Hey Ron <br>
> <br>
> You airspeed to go with that? <br>
> <br>
> Earl <br>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Van Putte" <<a href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">vanputte@cox.net</a>> <br>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>> <br>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:00 PM <br>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers <br>
> <br>
> <br>
>> Leave it to Earl. Derek asks a simple question and ..... It's >> like the guy who asks another what time it is and the other guy >> proceeds to describe how to make a watch! Just kidding. :-) <br>
>> Ron <br>
>> On Sep 8, 2010, at 6:47 PM, Earl Haury wrote: <br>
>>> Found a couple of the Aresti with for P11-F11 from last fall when >>> I was sorting out the sequences. Looks like the max altitude for >>> the M was 960ft., stall turn 875 as the tallest for P, the Top >>> Hat 920, stall turn 1200 (oops), humpty 930, for F - everything >>> else tops out closer to 800 max. <br>
>>> <br>
>>> Earl <br>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>
>>> From: Derek Koopowitz <br>
>>> To: General pattern discussion <br>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:09 PM <br>
>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers <br>
>>> <br>
>>> Has anyone done any testing using a altimeter of sorts such as >>> Eagletree's altimeter option to figure out exactly how high some >>> of our maneuvers end up? In using basic Trigonometry I can >>> estimate that if a plane is flown at 150 meters at a 60 degree >>> angle then the plane should be around 260m (around 800') high... >>> do we fly higher than this? Obviously the further out one flies >>> then the higher one gets if at 60 degrees. <br>
>>> <br>
>>> Are there any true measurements that one could relay to me... or >>> if someone has an altimeter, could you test it out and let me >>> know please? I'm particularly interested in current sequences/ >>> maneuvers... especially F3A or Masters. I don't think the lower >>> classes get to an altitude that is of any significance >>> (generally speaking of course). <br>
>>> <br>
>>> <br>
>>> _______________________________________________ <br>
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <br>
>>> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a> <br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a> <br>
>>> _______________________________________________ <br>
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <br>
>>> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a> <br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a> <br>
>> _______________________________________________ <br>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <br>
>> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a> <br>
>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a> <br>
> _______________________________________________ <br>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <br>
> <a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a> <br>
> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a> <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a> <br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a> <br>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_d0fbe93b-e722-40c8-a0f8-db13f53d23c7 -->
</div>
</font>