<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><P>So buy a Wind 110" (8S)?</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Or a 62" Osiris (5S)?</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Far cheaper than an Integral, which nobody is making you buy?</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Regards,</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Dave L</P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Ron Hansen" <rcpilot@wowway.com><BR>To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 12:36:56 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FW: weight difference<BR><BR></P>
<DIV><SPAN class=190521115-21082010><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial>No one that flys FAI wants the weight to increase or be eliminated because it won't have any effect on its popularity or cost. NSRCA is a different story. I firmly believe I am spending a lot more money for a light airplane that is not going to fly significantly better than a heavier airplane. All these airplanes fly better than I can already. Why are people buying Integrals and tossing the wings and building lighter ones. That cost money and should not be necessary. If you feel that spending 3-$4000 for a 10.5 lbs electric airplane makes you more competitive then by all means go for it. Just don't make me do it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></div></body></html>