<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16588"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Good article Jon. Hopefully this clarifies the
advantage of ever decreasing latency in the control system. Not to be
confused with human reaction time!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Ed</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title="mailto:jonlowe@aol.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:jonlowe@aol.com">Jon Lowe</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Friday, July 09, 2010 11:08 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT color=black size=2
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">There <SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: small"
class=Apple-style-span>is a great article on latency here:</SPAN>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: small" class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: small" class=Apple-style-span><A
href="http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml">http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml</A></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: small" class=Apple-style-span><BR></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: small" class=Apple-style-span><A
href="http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml"></A>A lot of people
are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency numbers, and don't see the whole
picture. This gives as good a fact based write up as any I've
seen.<BR></SPAN><BR>
<DIV style="CLEAR: both"><FONT color=black size=2
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><FONT color=black size=2 face=arial>Jon
Lowe</FONT></FONT></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: John Fuqua <<A
href="mailto:johnfuqua@embarqmail.com">johnfuqua@embarqmail.com</A>><BR>To:
'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent:
Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus<BR><BR>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; MARGIN: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12px"
id=AOLMsgPart_0_337b5958-6f1a-4745-bec0-d527f7e9c3c3><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><TT>How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster "command repetition
rate" anyway and relate it to some surface movement??? We are all ready at
instantaneous
-----Original Message-----
From: <A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A>
[<A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org?">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A>] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
Not only could the command repetition rate be increased, but you now have a
comms bus that will support duplex communication. This is a great way to
add telemetry devices.
Ed
--------------------------------------------------
From: "James Oddino" <<A href="mailto:joddino@socal.rr.com">joddino@socal.rr.com</A>>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AM
To: "General pattern discussion" <<A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width interface, they
> could have three times the rep rate with a digital interface, but who
> knows. There was a time when I knew what was going on inside RC systems
> so I could decide what was best. Futaba doesn't seem to care, or maybe
> the marketing guys don't know what is important.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:
>
>> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant connection option. As
>> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure at the serial driver
>> source does you in no matter what. Some redundancy is really needed to
>> make this have more appeal IMO. Still a really good step forward though.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Bill's Email" <<A href="mailto:wemodels@cox.net">wemodels@cox.net</A>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <<A href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>>
>>> There is a whole page of info as well on the Futaba FASST Site:
>>>
>>> <A href="http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html" target=_blank>http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html</A>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> <A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
>>> <A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> <A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
>> <A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> <A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
> <A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A>
>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
<A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
<A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
<A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A>
</TT></PRE></DIV><!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_337b5958-6f1a-4745-bec0-d527f7e9c3c3 --></DIV></DIV></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BODY></HTML>