<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18876"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>The Futaba 14MZ, 12Z and I believe the 12FG will automatically assign ports
(channels) for paired functions like dual elevators when you set up a new
model. The channels are assigned based on the configuration and are not
necessarily the same between 2.4 and 72mhz frequencies. The 14MZ channel
mapping on 2.4g does not follow the sequence we have used for all these
years. And when you switch a current model from 72 to 2.4, the radio asks
if you want to change the channel groupings to match the performance template
for that frequency. You can answer 'no' and it will leave the channels as
originally set up but not necessarily in the best performance mode.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Don</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 3/23/2010 7:41:52 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pamrich47@hotmail.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=#000000 size=2 face=Verdana>So if
I plug say 6 ailerons in to channels 1-6 like the original Futaba MZ web main
page shows, we would have to compensate somehow with End Point Adjustment and
Servo Speed on two? That doesn't seem right. It would seem more
logical that in a non-grouped setting--but effectively grouped--like ailerons,
twin elevator halves, or flaps, you would want them in the 1-4, 5-8, etc.
groups--but if you are specifically 'telling' those servos "Pal, you are tied
to this guy and he's the boss--you do what he does."...wouldn't the 'grouping'
function operate that way?<BR>RS<BR> <BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:26:03 -0700<BR>From: wemodels@cox.net<BR>To:
nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
curious<BR><BR>No, the Futaba FASST radios make three groups of four. What you
assign to those channels is up to you. Servos you want to get the signal
essentially simultaneoulsy you should put in the same
group.<BR><BR><BR><BR>Richard Strickland wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:BAY128-W25DD4820856A6E436B4623A0260@phx.gbl>
<STYLE>
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
</STYLE>
I get the impression from re-reading a few things that you can 'group' just
about any number of channel positions which would lead me to believe the
'master' takes over. But I need more input.<BR>RS<BR> <BR>
<HR id=ecxstopSpelling>
</BLOCKQUOTE> <BR><BR>
<HR>
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. <A title=http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_3 href="http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_3" target=_new>Get started.</A>
=<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>