<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
So if I plug say 6 ailerons in to channels 1-6 like the original Futaba MZ web main page shows, we would have to compensate somehow with End Point Adjustment and Servo Speed on two? That doesn't seem right. It would seem more logical that in a non-grouped setting--but effectively grouped--like ailerons, twin elevator halves, or flaps, you would want them in the 1-4, 5-8, etc. groups--but if you are specifically 'telling' those servos "Pal, you are tied to this guy and he's the boss--you do what he does."...wouldn't the 'grouping' function operate that way?<BR>
RS<BR> <BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:26:03 -0700<BR>From: wemodels@cox.net<BR>To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] curious<BR><BR>No, the Futaba FASST radios make three groups of four. What you assign to those channels is up to you. Servos you want to get the signal essentially simultaneoulsy you should put in the same group.<BR><BR><BR><BR>Richard Strickland wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:BAY128-W25DD4820856A6E436B4623A0260@phx.gbl>
<STYLE>
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
</STYLE>
I get the impression from re-reading a few things that you can 'group' just about any number of channel positions which would lead me to believe the 'master' takes over. But I need more input.<BR>RS<BR> <BR>
<HR id=ecxstopSpelling>
</BLOCKQUOTE> <BR> <br /><hr />The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. <a href='http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_3' target='_new'>Get started.</a></body>
</html>