<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Richard Strickland wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:BAY128-W16B9C955B8D6A444A2E52AA0260@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>So
going back to my first sentence/example with 6 aileron servos, I would
want three each in one of the three groups of four--in this case--2-4
and 5-7. Any potential latency 'lag' would have to be compensated with
servo speed, end point and sub-trim? But probably in reality, not
really noticeable. In my mind, I am/was confusing 'grouping' and
'mixing' on how grouping works in the radio. Thanks for the
clarification.<br>
<br>
Richard<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Using your example the servos connected together on the same surface
are going to move in unison (or so close that you cannot tell they are
not). Regardless of grouping you will still use the radio to fine tune
the center and end points for each servo connected to the same surface.
Servo speed you will likely not have to worry about.<br>
<br>
Latency does not affect centering or end points. It affects the "when"
of servo movement. Within the same group the servos all get the "when"
command at the same time.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>