<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
GEORGE KENNIE wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:3F4ED3A76AB54255B1FB4523EDE29FDD@george15cf36d8"
type="cite">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">After flying yesterday, I became
engrossed in a conversation with a buddy who has a dedicated 2.4 system
and we got talking about the latency </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">issues in the non-dedicated systems
and the gears started turning in my noodle. So my question is........Am
I seeing latency issues between the </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">performance of my 9C on 2.4 relative
to the 72 mg spectrum?</font></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
If you are using a Futaba FASST module and receives there is absolutely
no difference between module based systems and built-in non-module. If
you are using another after market module then you may very well be
seeing an effect of latency. All other non-Futaba modules will not be
as fast as the Futaba module in a Futaba radio.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>