<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I thought it is Dave's decision for 2010. 2011 is mandatory I thought. I knew I could be wrong.<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Joe Lachowski <<a href="mailto:jlachow@hotmail.com">jlachow@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
It was not Dave's decision. It was a joint AMA/NSRCA decision. AMA wants all RC activity at the site by 2011 to be DSS. Helicopter and Pylon are already there. The compromise was to allow Advanced and Intermediate to be allowed to continue operating on 72 for one more year. I bet at least 80 percent of the guys in Masters and FAI flew DSS at the Nats in 2009. Of course the plus side to DSS is less manpower required, improved safety and making it easier to set up the flight groups. The DSS requirements will also be spelled out on the entry forms. I hope I got all the facts right as Dave told me?<br> <br>
<hr id="stopSpelling">
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:53:25 -0700<br>From: <a href="mailto:homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com"><a href="mailto:homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com">homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com</a></a><br>To: <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></a><br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br><br>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">I believe that's why Dave wants to do it. <br><br>Isn't it cd's discretion? It sure would be easier on the cd if he didn't have to worry about frequencies, and people to run frequency impounds. That would be a nice time saver for the CD. I don't think there would be many in Masters or FAI that haven't switched yet and will be attending the nats. <br>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><em><font color="#0000bf" size="3" face="comic sans ms">Chris </font></em></strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br></div>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><br>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 13px"><font size="2" face="Tahoma">
<hr size="1">
<b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</span></b> Tony <<a href="mailto:tony@radiosouthrc.com">tony@radiosouthrc.com</a>><br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</span></b> General pattern discussion <<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>><br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</span></b> Wed, October 28, 2009 11:32:11 AM<br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br></font><br>I don't believe AMA would do this without NSRCA, as the SIG responsible for<br>the Pattern portion of the NATS, requesting it. Since Pattern is the only<br>event flown, there is no real advantage to not allowing 72Mhz, other than<br>transmitter impound/frequency control manpower requirements.<br><br><br><br>Tony Stillman, President<br>Radio South, Inc.<br>139 Altama Connector, Box 322<br>Brunswick, GA 31525<br>1-800-962-7802<br><a
href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com/"><a href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com">www.radiosouthrc.com</a></a><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a></a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a></a>] On Behalf Of Bill Glaze<br>Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:24 PM<br>To: General pattern discussion<br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br><br>Earlier, on this list, Tony Stillman stated that there was "no truth to the <br>rumor" that DSS would be required at the Nats in 2010. Changed?<br>Bill Glaze<br>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: <<a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:verne@twmi.rr.com">verne@twmi.rr.com</a></a>><br>To: "General pattern discussion" <<a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></a>><br>Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:20 PM<br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br><br><br>>I already fly with 2.4 so I'm not impacted. Having said that, it seems a <br>>little autocratic if it's not an across the board AMA Nats policy.<br>><br>> Verne<br>><br>><br>> ---- Derek Koopowitz <<a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:derekkoopowitz@gmail.com">derekkoopowitz@gmail.com</a></a>> wrote:<br>> This will be true for Masters and FAI only.<br>><br>> Sent from my iPhone<br>><br>> On Oct 28, 2009, at 6:28 AM, "Lance Van Nostrand"<br>> <<a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:patterndude@tx.rr.com">patterndude@tx.rr.com</a></a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> I heard someone state that starting in 2010 all pilots must fly 2.4G<br>>> at the Nats. I searched the discussion archives and the AMA website<br>>> and came up empty.<br>>> Is there
any truth to this?<br>>><br>>> --Lance<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></a><br><span>>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></a></span><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></a><br>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></a><br>> <br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<br><a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:%25e%25"><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></a><br></div></div></div><br> <br><hr>Windows 7: It works the way you want. <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen2:102009"
target="_new">Learn more.</a>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>NSRCA-discussion mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></div></blockquote><br>
</body></html>