<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt">I believe that's why Dave wants to do it. <br><br>Isn't it cd's discretion? It sure would be easier on the cd if he didn't have to worry about frequencies, and people to run frequency impounds. That would be a nice time saver for the CD. I don't think there would be many in Masters or FAI that haven't switched yet and will be attending the nats. <br><div> </div><div><strong><em><font color="#0000bf" face="comic sans ms" size="3">Chris </font></em></strong></div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div> </div><div><br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Tony
<tony@radiosouthrc.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wed, October 28, 2009 11:32:11 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br></font><br>
I don't believe AMA would do this without NSRCA, as the SIG responsible for<br>the Pattern portion of the NATS, requesting it. Since Pattern is the only<br>event flown, there is no real advantage to not allowing 72Mhz, other than<br>transmitter impound/frequency control manpower requirements.<br><br><br><br>Tony Stillman, President<br>Radio South, Inc.<br>139 Altama Connector, Box 322<br>Brunswick, GA 31525<br>1-800-962-7802<br><a target="_blank" href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com">www.radiosouthrc.com</a><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>[mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] On Behalf Of Bill Glaze<br>Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:24 PM<br>To: General pattern discussion<br>Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br><br>Earlier, on this list, Tony Stillman stated that there was "no truth to the <br>rumor" that DSS would be required at the Nats in 2010. Changed?<br>Bill Glaze<br>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: <<a ymailto="mailto:verne@twmi.rr.com" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">verne@twmi.rr.com</a>><br>To: "General pattern discussion" <<a ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a>><br>Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:20 PM<br>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2.4G Required at next Nats??<br><br><br>>I already fly with 2.4 so I'm not impacted. Having said that, it seems a <br>>little autocratic if it's not an across the board AMA Nats policy.<br>><br>> Verne<br>><br>><br>> ---- Derek Koopowitz <<a ymailto="mailto:derekkoopowitz@gmail.com" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">derekkoopowitz@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>> This will be true for Masters and FAI only.<br>><br>> Sent from my iPhone<br>><br>> On Oct 28, 2009, at 6:28 AM, "Lance Van Nostrand"<br>> <<a ymailto="mailto:patterndude@tx.rr.com" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">patterndude@tx.rr.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> I heard someone state that starting in 2010 all pilots must fly 2.4G<br>>> at the Nats. I searched the discussion archives and the AMA website<br>>> and came up empty.<br>>> Is there any truth to this?<br>>><br>>> --Lance<br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>>> <a ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><span>>> <a target="_blank" href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span><br>>
_______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> <a ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>> <br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto%3A%25e%25">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></div></div>
<!-- cg22.c1.mail.mud.yahoo.com compressed/chunked Wed Oct 28 07:26:40 PDT 2009 -->
</div><br>
</body></html>