<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Another question. Is the descending wing "stalled" in an axial or barrel roll?<div><br></div><div>Jim</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:59 PM, <a href="mailto:rjo626@aol.com">rjo626@aol.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" size="2" face="arial">
<div><font face="arial" color="black" size="2"> So do we all pretty much agree that most of us,even with a visible pitch break, are not stalling our aircraft,</font></div>
<div>because they are too stable and efficiently designed? So, we are not actually doing 'snap rolls' by definition?</div>
<div>So if we call them 'twinkle rolls' do we need to show pitch break? Do we keep it all the same and pull up elevator</div>
<div>before we perform our so called 'snap rolls' to make them resemble a real snap roll? I'm burnt out on the subject,</div>
<div>and pretty much don't care one way or the other. I just want to make sure that when I fly and judge 'snap rolls', </div>
<div>that both acts are acceptable to the majority of judges and pilots.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Later!</div>
<div> RJO</div>
<div> </div>
</font>
_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>