<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE type=text/css>P {
MARGIN: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18812"></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Without question, judging criteria needs
consistency; in no other way can judging accuracy be obtained. It's
difficult enough to do a consistent job of judging, without having to sort out
different descriptions of the same maneuver elements. Or so I see
it. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Bill Glaze</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ronlock@comcast.net
href="mailto:ronlock@comcast.net">ronlock@comcast.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">General pattern discussion</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed
rule change</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Yes, I agree
on making all the stall turn descriptions consistent, and match the stall turn
description as you note below.<BR><BR>Ron Lockhart<BR>----- Original Message
-----<BR>From: "Bob Richards" <<A
href="mailto:bob@toprudder.com">bob@toprudder.com</A>><BR>To: "General
pattern discussion" <<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>><BR>Sent:
Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:11:02 PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected<BR>Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed rule change<BR><BR>
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD
style="FONT-FAMILY: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; -x-system-font: none"
vAlign=top><BR>--- On <B>Sun, 10/11/09, ronlock@comcast.net
<I><ronlock@comcast.net></I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1381357132>I'd prefer the descriptions be left as is, and
accept that at some amount of wind, a 10 may not be possible.<BR>
<STYLE>#yiv1381357132 p {margin:0;}</STYLE>
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>I say the judging criteria should be the same for the stall turn
element(s) in all maneuvers that contain stall turns. At present,
the descriptions are inconsistent. At least change the Figure M and
Double Stall turn descriptions to match the Stall Turn w/ or w/o rolls,
from "model must be vertical" to "model track must be vertical". Can
we agree on
that?</DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>