<div>Hi, Joe - </div>
<div>Pretty sure the climbing legs have to be equal in length. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>According to the rulebook maneuver description, downgrade #2 is: <font size="2">
<p>Climbing and descending paths not of equal length. (also shown as 'climbing legs not of equal length' in the Masters sequence diagram...) </p>
<p>From that legs must be of equal length; Height MUST be adjusted in this maneuver since the plane enters at the bottom of the box and exits at the top.... </p>
<p>Things like turnaround top hats are exempt from the 'equal vertical length' thing, but both legs of this one are climbing... So they can be of any length BUT the lengths must be equal... </p>
<p>My $0.02... </p>
<p>Rick </p></font><br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Joe Dunnaway <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dunnaway@hbcomm.net">dunnaway@hbcomm.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote"> Can the "Half Square on Corners /w half rolls" vary in length on the legs as long as the rolls are centered in the lines? It is a turn around maneuver and most turn around maneuvers can be used to adjust height. My view would be that both legs should be equal but I can see where it could be argued that since you are adjusting your exit height, you should be able to vary the length.<br>
<br>Jeff Buchner asked me this at the Ft. Scott contest and I'm not sure of the answer.<br><br><br>Joe D.<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br></blockquote></div><br>