<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Vince, I’d like to see the power point file of the scale event.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="mailto:burtona@atmc.net">burtona@atmc.net</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Thanks’<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Dave Burton<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Vicente
"Vince" Bortone<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 23, 2009 10:39 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> General pattern discussion<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>What activities
the judges have before starting the WC? I assume that event of this level
requires that judges are calibrated before the contest. This is more
important in this case because they came from all continents. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>In 2003 I have
the opportunity to organize the flying judging for the US Scale Masters.
We had 60 pilots in 4 dasy of flying. We had 12
judges. We started to practice judging one year before the
contest. Yes, one year. We meet every two weeks to study the
rule book and make sure all understood the rules. We went to local
airports to see real planes landing and taking off to get the speed perception
that is very important in scale competition. Around two months
before the contest we invited pilots to fly scale planes in front of us.
We judged and discussed the downgrades after each fly. At the end of this
process all judges were withing one 1/2 point. I had only one
pilot complaining because he got zeros from 4 judges in two
rounds. He asked me why. I judged one of the round.
This pilot was flying a C-47 that was a work-of-art. The
engines came to life with electric starters so he never touched the
plane when got ready to fly. He also dressed like the real C-47
pilots in that time. It was amazing. However, he forgot the rule
that the center of the runway is the dead line and he crossed that line in two
rounds in two maneuvers. Believe me, it is hard to write that zero
in that particular case. All judges were so well calibrated and
understood the rules that they were sure when they wrote the
zero. It was very easy for me to explain to that
pilot. This was my best aeromodeling experience. If
someone wants to see pictures I have a power point file with pictures of
this event. Just send me an e-mail and I will send you the
file. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>In
conclusion, I really think that judges for the WC has to be at
the site at least one week before the contest. During the week prior they
should have calibration/re-training activities. I am sure that they
will find a lot of pilots that will be willing to fly so they can
practice. <br>
<br>
Vicente "Vince" Bortone<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Bill Glaze" <billglaze@bellsouth.net><br>
To: "General pattern discussion"
<nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:01:39 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
<br>
Gentlemen: Thanks for writing. Suspicions confirmed. Bill
Glaze<br>
----- Original Message ----- <br>
From: "Tony" <tony@radiosouthrc.com><br>
To: "'General pattern discussion'"
<nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:32 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
<br>
<br>
> Ron is absolutely correct! My "sorry I ever wrote what is
below" <br>
> statement<br>
> would be that the very best judged contest I attended was, in my opinion,<br>
> the F3A Team Trials when they were a separate event.<br>
><br>
> The absolutely worst contest was just about every F3A World Championships <br>
> I<br>
> have attended either as a CD or a Team Manager!<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Tony Stillman, President<br>
> Radio South, Inc.<br>
> 139 Altama Connector, Box 322<br>
> Brunswick, GA 31525<br>
> 1-800-962-7802<br>
> www.radiosouthrc.com<br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org<br>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van <br>
> Putte<br>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:53 PM<br>
> To: General pattern discussion<br>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
><br>
> I am probably going to be sorry I ever wrote what is below, but I<br>
> think now is the time.<br>
><br>
> If you've never critically watched an F3A World Championships, you<br>
> can't understand what goes on. You can fly a perfect flight and get<br>
> hammered.<br>
><br>
> First, many country's judges NEVER judge at all between F3A World<br>
> Championships. Many poor judges, in my opinion, are at EVERY F3A<br>
> World Championships. Just why some countries continue to send the<br>
> same poor judges, again my opinion, over and over, I don't understand.<br>
><br>
> Second, it seems that there is an understanding on how scoring will<br>
> be done among some countries' judges. For example, at one F3A World<br>
> Championships, flying far out not only was not downgraded, but flying<br>
> at 150 meters, where the aircraft is supposed to be, was downgraded.<br>
> At others, rules will be "bent" by the judges and it is up to
the<br>
> pilots and team managers to figure out what (that's not in the rules)<br>
> the judges are looking for.<br>
><br>
> At the 1995 F3A World Championships in Kasaoka, Japan, I was the U.S.<br>
> judge. During the Preliminaries, one country's judge was censured in<br>
> front of all the other judges for scoring the pilots from his<br>
> country's team too high. Then, in the Finals, I found out later that<br>
> it was determined that I was favoring the U.S. pilots, but I did not,<br>
> to my knowledge, change my judging standards. Apparently I either<br>
> didn't judge fairly, or I didn't get the word that the judging<br>
> standards were to be changed for the Finals.<br>
><br>
> You can ask Tony Stillman, Quique Somenzini, Chip Hyde, Jason<br>
> Shulman, Sean McMurtry, or any other active pilots at the F3A world-<br>
> class level, what they think of F3A World Championships judges. Just<br>
> don't ask them to do it publicly, where any F3A judges might read/<br>
> hear it, or they would be sure to be 'rewarded' by those judges at<br>
> the next F3A WC.<br>
><br>
> Ron Van Putte<br>
><br>
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 6:46 PM, Tony wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Tom:<br>
>> As a past 4-time USA F3A Team Manager, I saw a BUNCH of
"unknown"<br>
>> pilots fly<br>
>> FANTASTIC sequences and not get anywhere near the score they<br>
>> deserved... I<br>
>> can remember in Poland sitting with Chris Lakin and Kirk Grey watching<br>
>> several pilots and one was just fantastic! Chris and Kirk looked<br>
>> at each<br>
>> other and we need to check his scores! When they came out they<br>
>> were very<br>
>> low... very sad.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Tony Stillman, President<br>
>> Radio South, Inc.<br>
>> 139 Altama Connector, Box 322<br>
>> Brunswick, GA 31525<br>
>> 1-800-962-7802<br>
>> www.radiosouthrc.com<br>
>><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of<br>
>> Koenig, Tom<br>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 6:15 PM<br>
>> To: 'General pattern discussion'<br>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
>><br>
>> Ron and all,<br>
>><br>
>> I LOVE your suggestion. At least then we may have a chance of<br>
>> obtaining the<br>
>> correct placings and/or the correct world champion?<br>
>> Also-do not forget the cost savings to the organisation in that the<br>
>> airfares<br>
>> will be considerably cheaper by obtaining more 'local' judges. This<br>
>> is a big<br>
>> driver for the 'European' hosts....and why countries like Australia<br>
>> and NZ<br>
>> tend be disregarded if at all possible. We have issues in that<br>
>> Southern<br>
>> hemisphere countries always come from Winter climates where we have<br>
>> limited<br>
>> oppertunities to actually prepare/practice for a Northern (summer)<br>
>> world<br>
>> champs.<br>
>><br>
>> I have also heard suggestions from W/C contest pilots ( not just<br>
>> the aussie<br>
>> team btw), that the they wished they could not be 'identified'i.e<br>
>> that they<br>
>> be infront of some sort of screen whereby the judges could not<br>
>> identify the<br>
>> actual pilot.<br>
>><br>
>> Sure-some models could be used as a way of identifying the pilot,<br>
>> but there<br>
>> are plenty of the 'same' models being used these days.<br>
>><br>
>> I thought that was a cool and perhaps 'do-able' thing? More<br>
>> realistic than<br>
>> some sort of computerised/video 'tracking', despite such technology<br>
>> existing.<br>
>><br>
>> Tom<br>
>><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron<br>
>> Van Putte<br>
>> Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 4:57<br>
>> To: General pattern discussion<br>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
>><br>
>> I smile every time I think about this: The F3A World
Championships<br>
>> host<br>
>> gets a list of potential judges from which to pick. The total
list is<br>
>> predominantly European judges. Most F3A WCs end up with
predominantly<br>
>> European judges. The preponderance of European judges<br>
>> dictates how judging will be done. However, what if the list of<br>
>> judges for the 2111 F3A WC is mostly made up of a judge from the U.S.,<br>
>> Canada, Mexico, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, China, Japan,<br>
>> Argentina, Venezuela, etc , such that it that it is NOT made<br>
>> up of predominantly European judges? Who gets to pick the
judges?<br>
>> As the host organization, the NSRCA does.<br>
>><br>
>> Ron VP<br>
>><br>
>> On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Don Ramsey wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Matt,<br>
>>><br>
>>> You will be disappointed to know that all the World Judges want to<br>
>>> have rolling circles. I objected strongly and thought I made
a good<br>
>>> argument; loss of fields, over houses, too much real estate, etc.<br>
>>> But, they still want the rolling circles in all future patterns
and<br>
>>> especially F patterns. It sure limits the number of fields
that can<br>
>>> fly those patterns unless the pilots decide to roll in.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Don<br>
>>><br>
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-<br>
>>> discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
rcmaster199@aol.com<br>
>>><br>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 11:32 AM<br>
>>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> It seems to me that we keep "learning" the same lessons
but some just<br>
>>> never get the memo. Rolling circles are very neat differentiating<br>
>>> maneuvers BUT not desirable in neither IMAC nor Pattern circles.
They<br>
>>> simply consume too much real estate and contradict the very<br>
>>> essence of<br>
>>> why we in Pattern moved to quiet our models. Noise reduction<br>
>>> footprint<br>
>>> was at the core of that effort some 25 years ago.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> As my good friend Dean Pappas and I have discussed on many
occasions,<br>
>>> rolling loops, segments, variations, etc. are just as neat as
circles<br>
>>> and consume no more footprint than the typical schedule would. Oh<br>
>>> BTW,<br>
>>> these are far less difficult to judge objectively<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> MattK<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>>> From: Ed Alt <ed_alt@hotmail.com><br>
>>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>>> Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 10:08 pm<br>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
>>><br>
>>> It's funny. I brought my 40% Carden out of mothballs last
weekend to<br>
>>> work on the F3M stuff and all I wanted to do was fly it like a<br>
>>> pattern<br>
>>> airplane. Ofcourse it doesn't quite measure up, but I found
that I<br>
>>> really have no enthusiasm left for wapping through<br>
>>> rolls where the only skill involved is being able to stop on time.<br>
>>> I admit, on the last flight of the day I digressed and did about
10<br>
>>> minutes of 3d-ish garbage, until I finally realized that it was<br>
>>> really<br>
>>> not very satisfying. Foamies are more fun these days than<br>
>>> knocking the sticks around on a 40 % gasser. I guess I'm
just<br>
>>> getting old...<br>
>>><br>
>>> Ed<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:44:06 -0700<br>
>>>> From: seefo@san.rr.com<br>
>>>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Vince,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> The "Slow Roll" in IAC does not equate to a pattern
slow roll.<br>
>>> The IAC<br>
>>>> Slow Roll is just a roll, and the term slow is used to<br>
>>> differentiate it<br>
>>>> from a point roll or snap roll. In truth, the IAC slow roll is
never<br>
>>>> flown at anything but maximum roll rate available.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> -Doug<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Yes, partial rolling circles are introduced in the
Intermediate<br>
>>>>> class. As we know, there is not way to do rollers by
rolling fast.<br>
>>>>> IMAC is missing to introduce the slow roll in Sportsman's<br>
>>> class. I am<br>
>>>>> not sure why since IAC includes the slow roll.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
>>><br>
>>> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.<br>
>>> Sign up<br>
>>> now. =<br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion<br>
>>> mailing list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org http://<br>
>>> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
>><br>
>> **********************************************************************<br>
>> **<br>
>> *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may<br>
>> be confidential. If received in error, please delete all<br>
>> copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or<br>
>> dissemination of this email or its attachments is<br>
>> prohibited without the consent of the sender.<br>
>><br>
>> WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep<br>
>> outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty<br>
>> is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.<br>
>> Before opening or using attachments, please check for<br>
>> viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any<br>
>> affected attachments.<br>
>><br>
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the<br>
>> individual sender, except where the sender expressly,<br>
>> and with authority, states them to be the views of the<br>
>> organisation.<br>
>> **********************************************************************<br>
>> **<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>
> <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>