<div>Fluid meaning that the dates could move a few days forward or backward... yes, absolutely.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cast in concrete - when the 1st bulletin gets mailed out.<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frackowiak@sbcglobal.net">frackowiak@sbcglobal.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">No it has not been worked out. You are saying your dates for the WC are fluid, and the dates for the 2011 Nats are not set even tentatively. So there is a lot in the air.
<div><br></div>
<div>Tony</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div class="im">
<div>On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:</div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="im">
<div>Actually it had been all worked out until "everyone" started chiming in as to their preference for when the wc should be held and the Nats should be held... can't please all the people.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>LOL<br><br></div></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frackowiak@sbcglobal.net" target="_blank">frackowiak@sbcglobal.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">I absolutely agree. IRCHA will not move their dates unless forced to by the AMA. And I doubt the AMA will do so.
<div><br></div>
<div>I find it hard to believe that this has not been worked out yet. </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Tony</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Bill's Email wrote:</div><br></div></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">Anthony Frackowiak wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Archie is absolutely correct.
<div><br></div>
<div>Tony</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:</div><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span style="WORD-SPACING: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue">
<div>
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125); FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">IRCHA is a totally different animal though. Kind of like having Joe Nall after the pattern worlds. I’d say most people really didn’t care about the F3C worlds. IRCHA does a lot more 3D stuff. </span></div>
</div></div></span></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><br><br>And my point was that attracting 900 paid participants to an event is going to give them some clout when it comes to a schedule relative to the pattern NATS. The WC are a different thing, but IRCHA is not likely to budge for the pattern NATS if it came to that.<br>
<br><br></div></div></div>
<div class="im">
<div>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
<div class="im"><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div>
<div class="im"><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>