I agree. Most clubs in our area don't own the overfly area. They only own or lease 10 acres or so and the overfly area is usually a field owned by a farmer.<br />
<br />
<br />
-----Original Message-----<br />
From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels@cox.net><br />
Sent 8/18/2009 9:00:30 PM<br />
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br />
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Question for a friend for the experts<br />
<br />
That is a great resource, but keep in mind that it is not binding or required that you follow any of what the AMA presents under their recommendations. If you can follow them it will result in a very nice site, but if you cannot then you just do the best you can with the area you have to work with. Many people think that the AMA recommendations MUST be followed, and taht is not the case.<br />
<br />
<br />
dunnaway wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20090818193408.SM02308@%5B63.245.131.178%5D" type="cite">Mike, <br />
The AMA has a recommended specification for flying sites. It can be found on page 5 of this document on the AMA website. <font style="background-color: rgb(192,192,192)" face="Times New Roman"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://modelaircraft.org/files/memanual.pdf">http://modelaircraft.org/files/memanual.pdf</a></font><br />
</blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<pre>_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>