<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>The bottom line is this: the current rules encourage you to build a lighter plane no matter what power system you use. What's wrong with that? If you change the rules to allow heavier airplanes (of any type), then things will get weird. Right now the glow and electric airplanes are competitive with each other and both can make weight if you pay attention to details. Personally I don't like the way the rules are written because yes, there is a disparity between the electric vs. glow requirements but as I said, the bottom line is the current rules encourage you to build lighter. I don't see a problem with that.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>John Pavlick<BR><BR>--- On <B>Wed, 6/3/09, Dave <I><DaveL322@comcast.net></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Dave <DaveL322@comcast.net><BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight<BR>To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 11:30 AM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>Bill,<BR><BR>Starting from the position of a well designed plane (with proper wing<BR>loading), adding weight will not provide an advantage. What the weight<BR>limit rule does is limit the size the plane - larger planes will fly better<BR>which does provide an advantage.<BR><BR>The historical vs current perspective on this discussion point (which is<BR>well covered in the archives) boils down to this - <BR>- in the mid 1990s, planes with 2M wingspans and fuse length were common,<BR>and none are competitive today.<BR>- there is a difference between a skinny 2M plane of the past and a large 2M<BR>plane of today...the larger plane flies better.<BR>- allow the weight of planes to increase, and you will see even larger 2M<BR>planes (increased cost and complexity) that will obsolete the current crop<BR>of planes. This would not seem to be favored by anyone, and making the<BR>event more expensive will further limit those that
can afford the event, and<BR>reduce numbers in the event.<BR><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Dave<BR><BR><BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: <A href="http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR>[<SPAN>mailto</SPAN>:<A href="http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" ymailto="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</A>] On Behalf Of Bill's Email<BR>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:06 AM<BR>To: General pattern discussion<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight<BR><BR>I guess I should make a couple of things clear. First, I am not really <BR>trying to argue one way or the other, it was just something that struck <BR>as interesting. I left out structural weight and such for the sake of <BR>simplicity.<BR><BR>I have no
personal ax to grind, I fly an electric that is absurdly light <BR>so I am not trying to do anything there. <BR><BR>I guess the real question is, what is the objective of the weight limit <BR>rule in the first place? Is there an advantage in being heavier??<BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR><A href="http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR><A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR><A href="http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>