<div>I don't see it as being what the leadership wants... its what the membership wants. I'm taking a lot of notes these days because the rules survey is being put together in hopes that we (all of us - the membership) steer the NSRCA in a direction that benefits pattern.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>BTW, I've always thought that pattern is and should be a fun sport - I know that we generally have a lot of fun at our contests. Lets keep it that way. I also know that, to some, pattern is a job and they work really hard at it.<br>
<br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Keith Hoard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:khoard@gmail.com">khoard@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I guess the bottom line to all of this is: Does the NSRCA leadership want Pattern to be a fun leisure-time activity, or a part-time job?<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hester <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kerlock@comcast.net" target="_blank">kerlock@comcast.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue" bgcolor="white">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I'll second that. </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I haven't flown pattern as long as some, but in the years I have spent I haven't seen trophy hounds being an issue at all. yes they exist occasionally. But they rarely last long. Sooner or later they get beat, and that's the end of it soon after. natural selection I guess.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I'm the poster child for the advancement problem to masters as described earlier. When I was flying advanced I had a lot of time to practice and did pretty well. Then I got the bright idea to kit a wood pattern plane....so much for free time LOL So this is my 3rd year in masters and I have yet to get anywhere close to practiced form. This year started out well, then I lost my only plane. So much for this season.....</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Not that I would want to return to advanced at all, I belong in masters. But I can see plainly where others have moved up because of points and wierd circumstances and they are over thier head, as in more than usually expected. These are some of the best people in pattern and I would hate to lose them just because of an arbitrary rule to weed out the so called sandbagger, who is rare as hen's teeth.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">In that respect, I agree with Mark....make it a guideline ONLY. I have enough faith in people that they will do what's right and fly in the class they need to be in. maybe not all the time, but enough so it won't really matter in the big picture. </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">-Mike</font></div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(0,0,0) 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND: rgb(228,228,228); FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><b>From:</b> <a title="atwoodm@paragon-inc.com" href="mailto:atwoodm@paragon-inc.com" target="_blank">Atwood, Mark</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><b>To:</b> <a title="nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">General pattern discussion</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 08, 2009 10:46 AM</div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><b>Subject:</b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System - follow up</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">I really do think this is easy.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Change the advancement rule to be a guideline, not a rule.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">People should be able to change what class they fly when they want to. Yes, there could be the occasional A$$ that changes for the wrong reason, but let’s not make rules just to capture idiots, and make more work for everyone else in the process.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">People move between FAI and Masters ALL THE TIME based on who’s at a contest, or the overall contest make up and no one cares. There’s no reason that the same can’t happen in the lower classes. Let’s just try it for a bit. Please??</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">All we need is a proposal to change the wording on advancement to be a guideline, a recommendation. And remove any language that refers to mandatory advancement or prevents people from moving back down a level.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Let’s see what problems it causes. I’m betting NONE, and it will eliminate numerous problems.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">-M</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: rgb(181,196,223) 1pt solid; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<p><b><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">From:</span></b><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Earl Haury<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 08, 2009 9:33 AM<br><b>To:</b> Discussion List, NSRCA<br><b>Subject:</b> [NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System - follow up</span></p></div></div>
<p> </p>
<div>
<p><span>Lots of good observations and comments that are on topic. </span></p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>Also, adjusting the sequences / classes may be a fix to the root cause of poor skill fits in a given class that would dictate moving up or down.</span></p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>IMHO, I believe the immediate focus should be on changing the advancement system so that folks who find themselves in a class way beyond their skill level have a mechanism to move to a class better fitting their skills. I'm not proposing that the focused competitor who moves up and then finds themselves not competitive for a few years should move back. I do believe that the casual competitor who finds that age / career / family / increased sequence difficulty should be able to easily move to a class where they're comfortable. As the discussions regarding sequence content indicate, the consummate competitor wants (needs) an increasing level of difficulty to maintain challenge & interest. This increase in difficulty can (and apparently does) overwhelm some casual competitors who then leave pattern. Possibly they can be retained if it were easy for them to drop back a class.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>I don't perceive that this discussion has reached a consensus on how best to handle the current advancement system, previous discussions have ended similarly and nothing much has changed. The options seem to be:</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>1. Leave the current system alone & adjust sequences / classes. (Appears to concede to the lowest skill pilots per class.)</span></p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>2. No official advancement system, peer pressure is adequate. (Might actually work, most pattern folks are honorable.)</span></p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>3. Variant of current system with provisions for casual competitors to move back basis their comfort / performance. (Probably OK and would seem to have a good chance with the CB.)</span></p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>4. Performance based system where folks float between classes basis performance. (Actually my favorite as it would both satisfy providing comfort to the casual and prestige to the consummate. Unfortunately logistically most difficult, someone would need to manage the data and assign classes.)</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>So - the trick is to reach some sort of consensus and move it to a rules proposal. Discussion alone won't get the job done.</span></p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p> </p></div>
<div>
<p><span>Earl</span></p></div>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">No virus found in this incoming message.<br>Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com/" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>Version: 8.5.285 / Virus Database: 270.12.19/2099 - Release Date: 05/07/09 18:05:00</span></p>
</div><br><br><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><br><br>E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.1.441)<br>Database version: 6.12350<br><a href="http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/" target="_blank">http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/</a><br>
</b></font>
<p></p>
<hr>
<p></p>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
<br><br><br>E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.1.441)<br>Database version: 6.12350<br><a href="http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/" target="_blank">http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/</a><br>
</blockquote><br><br><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><br><br>E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.1.441)<br>Database version: 6.12350<br><a href="http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/" target="_blank">http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/</a><br>
</b></font></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target="_blank">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</blockquote></div><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>Keith Hoard<br>Collierville, TN<br><a href="mailto:khoard@gmail.com" target="_blank">khoard@gmail.com</a><br><br><br></font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>