<div> <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Earl,<br>
I have to agree. I think trashing the whole advancement "system" is the best approach, except from Sportsman to Intermediate. Peer pressure will do the job, and no one is formally tracking points anyway. If the lower sequences, except maybe for Sportsman, are changed on a two year cycle, that will keep it interesting for the people who elect to stay in lower classes. I think "declaring" your class for the year at your first contest of the year would keep people from cherry picking contests.<br>
<br>
My understanding is that some countries (Australia?) make you prove you are ready to move up, rather than forced moves. I'm not advocating that, but I think that moving when you are ready is better than forced moves. I had a year in Advanced with sporadic competition that almost pointed me out the first year, back before the two year rule. I stayed away from a couple of contests late in the season because I was trying to stay within the letter of the rules rather than point out. The second year I had more competition, with many fewer high placements. If the advanced pattern had changed this year, and we didn't have the point rule, I might have stayed in advanced a while longer. I'm clearly not competitive yet in Masters, although I am improving slowly. My Dad can tell you that my first few attempts at Masters were rather scary. <br>
<br>
Jon<br>
</font></div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Earl Haury <ejhaury@comcast.net><br>
To: Discussion List, NSRCA <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Thu, 7 May 2009 9:24 am<br>
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System<br>
<br>
<div id="AOLMsgPart_3_e427b966-4081-4093-acd0-49db53da5c66">
<div><font face="Arial">In the discussion regarding the Masters sequence / length
a few competitors mentioned that increasing the difficulty would cause them to
stop competing. Folks, this needs to be addressed! We can't tolerate a system
where folks are forced to a level where they can't enjoy pattern and/or chose to
quit. </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial">There are generally two views of the current system. One
is that it is cast in stone and needed to force the "trophy hound" to move
to the proper class. The other is that peer pressure alone will result in proper
classification. I think that there's a third possibility, some folks prematurely
move to a higher class for the "prestige" of that class. There's likely
reality / unreality to each view which supports that some process is
needed. While there have been some changes to smooth the advancement
process, nothing has changed for a person who finds themselves in a class
that exceeds their skills. I know - there's a process to petition for dropping
to a lower class, but it's intended for hardship cases rather than being
uncompetitive.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial">OK - going back to the first paragraph - how might we fix
this? My suggestion is to change the rules so that folks who gather points in
the lower percentile of a class for X number of events (or rounds, or time
span?) have the option to stay where they are, or move back a class. The current
advancement rules would be applied to folks in the upper percentile. It seems
that this would provide an option for the casual competitor to seek a comfort
level and retain a reasonable advancement process for the serious competitor. Of
course there are administrative issues, probably best to simply use data within
each district, as most already track points for district championships. A
district based data set would also best weight performance within one's local
peer group.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial">Just my thoughts - how about the group discussing this
some.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial">Earl</font></div>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_3_e427b966-4081-4093-acd0-49db53da5c66 -->
<div id="AOLMsgPart_4_e427b966-4081-4093-acd0-49db53da5c66" style="margin: 0px; font-family: Tahoma,Verdana,Arial,Sans-Serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
</tt></pre>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_4_e427b966-4081-4093-acd0-49db53da5c66 -->
<div id='MAILCIADB026-5c784a02f8ca203' class='aol_ad_footer'><br/><font style="color:black;font:normal 10pt arial,san-serif;"> <hr style="margin-top:10px"/>Shopping for Mom? <a href="http://shopping.aol.com/mothers-day-gifts-for-mom?ncid=emlweinstor00000003">Save yourself a little time and money on AOL Shopping</a>.</font> </div>