<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
John Fuqua wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:01ca01c9cdde$45c6a590$7101a8c0@ltm733c31251f5"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">I have an interesting and
perplexing thing going on with my
12 FGA Futaba 2.4ghz transmitter that is not duplicated by others here
locally. I thought I would throw it out to the list and see if anyone
else has noticed this anomaly.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">When I turn on my 12FGA
2.4 TX it
takes all my 2.4 ghz receivers (7 ch, 8 ch, 14 ch) about 1 or 2 seconds
before
any control surfaces neutralize. With Ron Van Putte’s 12 FGA
2.4 and his 14 ch rx it is instantaneous. We checked a 14MZ 2.4 tx
with
an 8 ch Rx and it is about the same as Ron’s. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Has anyone else using the
12 FGA
noticed this. This does not seem to affect performance but I am
puzzled
why I see this time differential to neutralize.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">John<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
The earlier generation of FASST receivers seemed to have a touch slower
boot time. The newer ones boot immediately. My 608FS takes a second or
so while my 6008 is instant on. My 6014 is also instant on as are the
617 and 6004 I have. And my 617's and 6004 act the same whether they
are bound to my 14MZ or my 6EX FASST.<br>
<br>
I have a bunch of surface receivers as well, sort of first generation
FASST out even before the plane stuff came out and they all have a
momentary hesitation at start up.<br>
<br>
And as you say, it has no affect on the performance of the radio.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>