<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 9">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 9">
<link rel=File-List href="cid:filelist.xml@01C98526.55108FD0">
<link rel=Edit-Time-Data href="cid:editdata.mso@01C98526.55108FD0">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:DoNotRelyOnCSS/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:DocumentKind>DocumentEmail</w:DocumentKind>
<w:EnvelopeVis/>
<w:DoNotOptimizeForBrowser/>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:1627421319 -2147483648 8 0 66047 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:536871559 0 0 0 415 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
p.MsoNormalIndent, li.MsoNormalIndent, div.MsoNormalIndent
{margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;
text-underline:single;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;
text-underline:single;}
p.MsoAutoSig, li.MsoAutoSig, div.MsoAutoSig
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
p
{margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
pre
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
tab-stops:45.8pt 91.6pt 137.4pt 183.2pt 229.0pt 274.8pt 320.6pt 366.4pt 412.2pt 458.0pt 503.8pt 549.6pt 595.4pt 641.2pt 687.0pt 732.8pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.NormalWeb1, li.NormalWeb1, div.NormalWeb1
{mso-style-name:"Normal \(Web\)1";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ascii-font-family:Arial;
mso-hansi-font-family:Arial;
mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ascii-font-family:Arial;
mso-hansi-font-family:Arial;
mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;
color:#993366;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027"/>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/>
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue style='tab-interval:.5in'>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=EmailStyle23><font size=2 color="#993366"
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial'>I remember the discussion, thanks for reminding me of the Australian
system. Before it could be considered we would need the national database which
sidetracked the discussion to change the advancement rule last year. I
considered just submitting a change proposal but time was short and I just
walked away from it. <o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=EmailStyle23><font size=2 color="#993366"
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial'>Pattern being an open rulebook event I suspect AMA would need to administrate
class advancement regardless of how it is done. <o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=EmailStyle23><font size=2 color="#993366"
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial'>Jim<o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=EmailStyle23><font size=2 color="#993366"
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=EmailStyle23><font size=2 color="#993366"
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 color=black
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original
Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]<b><span style='font-weight:
bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>John Gayer<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Monday, February 02, 2009
7:07 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> General pattern discussion<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Mandatory Advancment</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Jim,<br>
<br>
When this subject came up lst year I suggested looking into the advancement
system the Australian Pattern Association uses to address the issues you are
bringing up. Their system is maintained by the APA which maintains the status
of each pilot attending any sanctioned contests. In Australia you earn
advancement to the next class by beating a national standard (raw score)
three times in a running 12month period. They have 4 classes (FAI,Expert,
Advanced and Sportsman). Since the APA is keeping track of all competitor's
advancement status, there is no honor system or bookkeeping issues for the
competitor. Since advancement is based on national scoring averages of the
FAI(Masters) community, the quality of the local competition in the individual
classes is removed(mostly) from the class advancement criteria. Also,
advancement of the top flyer in a class locally has no impact on the
advancement of the remaining competitors in that class.<br>
I flew under this system for a couple of years and it works quite well. The
biggest problem, as always, was fair and honest judging. Typically,
classes were judged by competitors in the next higher class and there was a
tendency to keep lower class competitors down on the farm.<br>
More more information on the Australian advancement system, go to <a
href="http://www.australianpatternassociation.com.au">http://www.australianpatternassociation.com.au</a>
and drill down to rules and then MAAA Rules, scroll down to R/C Aerobatics
Grading System to get a complete description.<br>
<br>
John<br>
<br>
<br>
J N Hiller wrote: <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<u1:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<u1:DoNotRelyOnCSS/>
</u1:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<u2:WordDocument>
<u2:Zoom>0</u2:Zoom>
<u2:DocumentKind>DocumentEmail</u2:DocumentKind>
<u2:EnvelopeVis/>
<u2:DoNotOptimizeForBrowser/>
</u2:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->Yes John the NSRCA rules change survey is for ALL who are
interested in pattern (RC Aerobatics). We can't emphasize this enough. For
those who haven't been around longer than dirt, the objective of the NSRCA is
to gain some consensuses within the pattern community regarding rule change
proposals. This process reduced the total number of proposals the AMA change
process needed to deal with, many of which were in conflict or adversely
affecting each other, greatly complicating the re-right between the first and
second AMA votes. At least I think that is how it was. It's been a while! In
any case individuals can still make change proposals directly to AMA. To my
knowledge AMA rules are not controlled or dictated by any special interest
group.<u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><u3:p></u3:p><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>While
out for a walk this afternoon I had a couple more thoughts that I wish to
share. First the story of how I got to masters should have included how the
remaining advanced fliers would be affected by my absence. They will likely be
trading first place advancement points, which will accumulating faster,
epically if a single individual dominates. Without gaining significant
proficiency someone could find himself or herself forced into masters much less
prepared than I, which can be difficult at best. <u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><u3:p></u3:p><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>When
I spoke of using the raw score as a personal benchmark I was actually using the
judge awarded average not the total K factor average. I found a couple contest
records both of which had 10-point takeoff and landing, which contributed
excessively to my performance average. The K-average was 1 to 2 % lower due to
lower scores in higher K maneuvers. The value to be used needs to be the K
value average.<u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><u3:p></u3:p><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>The
other thing we should consider is revising / simplifying the rule used to allow
a return to a lower class. Nobody enjoys being in last place all the time. A
performance average used for advancement effectively identifies the upper
performance limit within a class and an equally valid argument could be made to
use a minimum value, below maybe 50%, to allow return to the next lower class.
Of course this of course would not be mandatory.<u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><u3:p></u3:p><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>The
thought also occurred to me that some incomplete flights due to a double fowl
line violation should be included in the contest performance average as well.
We don't see this very often but it justifiably pulls down the competitor's
performance average.<u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><u3:p></u3:p><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>If
you have read this far you are interested. Don't worry about offending me. Post
your thoughts.<u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><span class=EmailStyle21><u3:p></u3:p><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Jim
<u3:p></u3:p></span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:1.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><font size=2 color=black
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'><u3:p></u3:p>-----Original
Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> <a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>]<b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>John Konneker<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Sunday, February 01, 2009
1:36 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Discussion List<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Mandatory Advancment</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:
12.0pt;margin-left:1.5in'><font size=2 color=black face=Verdana><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Verdana'><u3:p></u3:p>Jim,<br>
Thank you for the thoughtful reply and your interest in the survey.<br>
As someone once told me, you can't have change without dissatisfaction.<br>
The subject of class advancement comes up often enough that one has<br>
to believe a lot of folks feel there is a better way.<br>
You bring up some excellent alternatives that need to be discussed.<br>
I know this discussion will lead to one or more survey proposals.<br>
I hope to have the survey ready to publish on the website, in the K-Factor and <br>
Model Aviation and on the various forums by late summer. So we have
time<br>
to formulate your ideas.<br>
By the way, the survey will be open to ALL those interested in pattern.<br>
NOT just NSRCA members.<br>
Once again thanks Jim!<br>
JLK<br>
<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:jnhiller@earthlink.net">jnhiller@earthlink.net</a><br>
> To: <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:37:25 -0800<br>
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Mandatory Advancment<br>
> <br>
> John, I would be happy to get involved with this.<br>
> <br>
> I believe flight score averages derived from complete flights are good<br>
> indicators of ability. Advancement could be based on multiple contest<br>
> average (maybe 6???), enough to demonstrate consistency. 70%? 75%? 80%?
85%?<br>
> could be used as an advancement indicator rather it be mandatory or simply
a<br>
> recommendation. Not having raw scores information it would be difficult
for<br>
> me to suggest a hard number. Probably needs to be included in a proposal!<br>
> Last season's contest raw scores would be a good indicator of an
appropriate<br>
> value.<br>
> <br>
> Here is my story:<br>
> I'm being pushed into masters where it's not likely that I will ever be
very<br>
> competitive, but that's OK. I reached my personal plateau of about 80%<br>
> flying advanced in 2007. Through much of 2008 during practice I was just<br>
> standing in the flight box going through the motions, talking to who ever<br>
> was standing there. I expect I will be hard pressed to break 70% in
masters.<br>
> My feeling is advancement percentage needs to increase with the class<br>
> progression as the skill development or learning curve tends to level out.<br>
> Not that the maneuvers are more difficult relative to our acquired ability<br>
> but the sequences become much less forgiving of even simple errors.<br>
> <br>
> For something like this to work the AMA would need to maintain accessible<br>
> records that are consistently updated by CD's. How many pattern contests
are<br>
> sanctioned? Does AMA still require CD to send contest results to AMA? How<br>
> many CD's actually do? We started to touch on this issue in the 'national<br>
> database' discussion last year. How can it be done? Who is going to do it?<br>
> Who needs to be involved to make this happen? Are they interested? Are we<br>
> (pattern fliers) interested?<br>
> <br>
> Change is never without obstacles. Lets discuss this and other ideas and
add<br>
> it to the rules proposal survey. Lets try not to get overwhelmed with<br>
> unreasonable high tech automated data management systems. We only need one<br>
> additional number included with contest results and a new advancement<br>
> 'points' card format.<br>
> <br>
> It's past time to try something different. John, how much time do we have?<br>
> <br>
> Jim Hiller<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
> [<a href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</a>]On
Behalf Of John Konneker<br>
> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:17 AM<br>
> To: Discussion List; <a href="mailto:d_bodary@yahoo.com">d_bodary@yahoo.com</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Pattern Classes & Growth<br>
> <br>
> hmmm...<br>
> Jim H.,<br>
> That looks like a good rules proposal in the making!<br>
> I'd be happy to include it in the survey.<br>
> ;-)<br>
> JLK<br>
> <br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]><br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![endif]><u3:p></u3:p></span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre
style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:
1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center'><font size=2 color=black
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>
<hr size=4 width="90%" align=center>
</span></font></pre><pre style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><font size=2
color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre
style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:
1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre
style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:
1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre
style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:
1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></pre><pre
style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:.5in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:
1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'><a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></pre></div>
</body>
</html>