<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Sillyness.. <IMG src="http://mail.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/03.gif"></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I use a dual rate switch for more throw for stall, spins and snaps. I don't use a snap switch or a spin switch. I do use mixing. </DIV>
<DIV>You are saying I shouldn't be allowed to use a dual rate switch or a mix to help my poorly designed plane to fly a little more like a better designed plane that alot of us can't afford that takes less mix or could maybe get away with none? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sillyness Matt. <IMG src="http://mail.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/30.gif"></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Although, I'm not sure why people use a snap switch. In my opinion it's so much easier to fly them with the sticks. They present better IMO. Take for instance the 45 down, 1 1/2 snap. Using a switch I see people way steeper than 45 as they let off the switch. Why? Because the up ele is still held until the last second. </DIV>
<DIV>Switches don't make you a top pilot. Practice and skill does.. If people need em, I say use em. That's why they are there. For me, I'll stick with just a single dual rate switch.. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sorry. Just my thoughts... </DIV>
<DIV><EM>Disclamer: These words are not to be used against me in any way shape or form or a cloud will instantly form over you while you are flying and you will get dumped on before you can put away your gear. (Ruining your cell phone because it falls into a puddle)</EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM></EM> </DIV>
<DIV>Oh wait, that's what happened to us (D7) several times while practicing at the nats.. lol</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><IMG src="http://mail.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/18.gif"></DIV>
<DIV> <BR> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face="comic sans ms" color=#0000bf size=3>Chris </FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif">----- Original Message ----<BR>From: Matthew Frederick <mjfrederick@cox.net><BR>To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 8:19:10 PM<BR>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Have we lost our way? (Sorry, George, but your question inspired this)<BR><BR>Call me crazy if you want, but I'm getting sick of all these "conditions" <BR>being allowed in pattern. The whole point of what we do puts emphasis on the <BR>pilot being in control of the model at all times. It's one thing to flip a <BR>switch to enable higher rates for a snap, stall, slow roll, whatever. I <BR>think we're going too far with just pulling the stick past 90 degrees to <BR>instill a snap "condition" that will automatically perform a snap roll with <BR>the programmed inputs. In the rules it states that you can't have a "timed" <BR>switch, witch basically was put in
to avoid people from programming a snap <BR>switch that gave the elevator a slight lead on all the other inputs. <BR>Allowing the elevator (or any other) stick to provide this same advantage is <BR>tantamount to cheating, it just happens to pass the current rules test. The <BR>more I hear about people putting these types of conditions that are merely <BR>contingent on stick position, the more I think it's coming time for a rules <BR>change to stop it. We're supposed to be better than this. I'm probably <BR>waaaay out on a limb by myself here, but from where I sit having started in <BR>pattern back in the late 80's, I think we're losing our way by allowing <BR>computers to perform operations that should be required by the pilots. I <BR>don't even believe in programmed mixes and avoid them like the plague.<BR><BR>Matt<BR><BR>P.S. Before anyone who knows me asks, yes, I did fly a Genesis, and yes I <BR>did have elevator to rudder mix on that... hopefully
my next plane won't <BR>suck like that... <BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" ymailto="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR><A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></DIV></DIV></div><br>
</body></html>