<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3354" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Yeah, now we can get to MUCH MORE controversial
straght lines and multiple radii.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jerry</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jpavlick@idseng.com href="mailto:jpavlick@idseng.com">John
Pavlick</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">General pattern discussion</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:37
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Correct
Geometry on N</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Woo hoo! Progress! We've finally reached the next level! We're not
arguing about snaps and spins anymore!!! <LOL></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>John Pavlick<BR><BR><B><I>Bob Richards <<A
href="mailto:bob@toprudder.com">bob@toprudder.com</A>></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>Ken,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>There is no requirement for the manuever to be square. Vertical
lines must be vertical, 45s must be 45s, all radii must be constant
and equal. The only way to get a square out of this is to extend the
vertical and diagonal lines until they intersect, which is outside the
boundary of the manuever. If someone flies low and with large radii,
this could actually put the lower intersections below ground level. Do
we downgrade the mauever then because part of it was out of the box?
:-)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The height (from bottom of lower loop segments to the top of the
upper loop segments) will always be less than the width (vertical line
to vertical line). Looking for the manuever to be square (or
rectangle, for that matter) should not be a judging criteria, IMHO.
<BR><BR>Bob R<BR><BR>--- On <B>Tue, 7/8/08, Ken Velez
<I><kvelez@comcast.net></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><PRE>Mark, I think this is consider a square althoug the cad program shows a smaller leg at the ends due to the rdii but the foot print is a square. I know you said the fundamental shape is a square I think calling it a rectangle will create confusion. As a Judge Iwill be looking for a Square shape> Ken </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>