<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
"G" and Jim, <BR>I realize my error soon after Jim's post.<BR>
Thanks to you both!<BR>
JLK<BR><BR>> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:12:41 -0500<BR>> From: glmiller3@suddenlink.net<BR>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Incidence Meter<BR>> <BR>> John and all,<BR>> <BR>> OK, I took a machinists square and put it on my workbench, put the inclinometer on the square on the bench and zero'd it. I then put the meter on the vertical arm and it read 90.0 back to horizontial and it read 0.1 back to vertical = 90.1 back to horizontal = 0.1 So as advertised, the device seems accurate and precise to +/- 0.1 degrees. Rotating mine front to back gives similar accuracy - your case may not be quite square, John.<BR>> <BR>> G<BR>> ---- John Konneker <jlkonn@hotmail.com> wrote: <BR>> <BR>> =============<BR>> <BR>> I just got mine.<BR>> What does yours show when you rotate it 180 degrees?<BR>> In other words you are reading it from the right side of the plane and you turn it to read from the left side.<BR>> Just turning the Wixey device, nothing else.<BR>> Mine shows a .5 degree difference.<BR>> JLK> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:19:35 -0500> From: glmiller3@suddenlink.net> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Incidence Meter> > Here is a link to my post on RCU regarding the adaptation of the Wixey Inclinometer for use as an incidence meter.> > > http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_7689336/tm.htm> > Great little doo dad for 40 bucks!> > G> _______________________________________________> NSRCA-discussion mailing list> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR><BR></body>
</html>