<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1555" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=680421016-30052008><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff>Common
Chad... just say it. You get what you pay for...lol</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P><FONT
size=2>Regards,<BR>Jason<BR>www.jasonshulman.com<BR>www.shulmanaviation.com<BR>www.composite-arf.com</FONT>
</P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Chad
Northeast<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 30, 2008 12:00 PM<BR><B>To:</B> General
pattern discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final
Update...I hope...<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>Some outrunners have problems
:-)<BR><BR>Lets not group them all into one category ;-)<BR><BR>IMO it's a lot
more effort in design for the OEM to get an outrunner to compete with an
inrunner in the larger sizes, but if they do it the result is a much more
reliable setup. <BR><BR>Chad<BR><BR>----- Original Message
-----<BR>From: J N Hiller <jnhiller@earthlink.net><BR>Date: Friday, May
30, 2008 9:42 am<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final Update...I
hope...<BR>To: General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR><BR>> You guys are starting to
get my attention. Outrunners have <BR>> problems? Please<BR>> tell me
more. Keck I still run a muffler equipped two stroke but <BR>> I am<BR>>
interested in learning more about electric. Is the problem <BR>> associated
with<BR>> larger sizes only? I thought the simplicity of not running a
<BR>> gearbox would<BR>> be a positive thing even though electric motors
appear to be <BR>> happier if they<BR>> can turn more RPM's. It would
appear that if the outrunners were <BR>> larger in<BR>> diameter they
would be better torque producers. Please post more <BR>> details.Jim
Hiller<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Budd<BR>>
Engineering<BR>> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:36 PM<BR>> To: General
pattern discussion<BR>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final
Update...I hope...<BR>> <BR>> Hey Jas,<BR>> <BR>> Smoke is for
amateurs. I had one with flames!<BR>> <BR>> : )<BR>> <BR>>
Jerry<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Budd Engineering<BR>>
jerry@buddengineering.com <mailto:jerry@buddengineering.com><BR>>
http://www.buddengineering.com<BR>> <BR>> On May 29, 2008, at 7:01 PM,
JShulman wrote:<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Chris, I already sent out
all the "stuff" guys wanted from my <BR>> bin... I don't<BR>> remember a
Hacker request.....lol. Probably cause they aren't for<BR>>
sale...lol.<BR>> <BR>> I figured something was up with the 1 worder...
and don't feel <BR>> bad, you're<BR>> not the only one that's smoked and
electric.<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> Jason<BR>> www.jasonshulman.com
<http://www.jasonshulman.com><BR>> www.shulmanaviation.com
<http://www.shulmanaviation.com><BR>> www.composite-arf.com<BR>>
<http://www.composite-arf.com><BR>> </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>