<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel tanks</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Well...when the DZ’s first came out I ran a bladder tank for a bit...that effectively does the same thing. But they’re a pain...you always have to be careful how you fill them, and always a measured amount.<BR>
<BR>
I’ve had much MUCH better success and simplicity by using a small header tank instead. You still get “sloshing” in the main tank, but we’ve always had that. The header tank though remains full and gives the engine a constant draw.<BR>
<BR>
-M<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 5/14/08 9:37 AM, "John Konneker" <jlkonn@hotmail.com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>I am running a 24 oz tank right now for practice but would like to run either a smaller tank or less fuel load for contests.<BR>
This has me thinking...seems I once heard that NASCAR runs some kind of foam in their gas tanks to eliminate sloshing.<BR>
Anyone ever heard of or tried something similar in a model?<BR>
JLK<BR>
<BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="95%"></SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT FACE="Consolas, Courier New, Courier">_______________________________________________<BR>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>