<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Cris</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I say no. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think we should quit speaking to those who
continue to sully their hands and airplanes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>
Nat</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com
href="mailto:homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com">krishlan fitzsimmons</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:59
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] True RC
batteries</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Ah, I C...</DIV>
<DIV>I understand the difference of power from the pro lites. Great batteries
in their day, still good today. When I switched to Flight Powers it was also
hard to get people to listen that we had to tone our throttle curve. This in
turn created less heat in my batteries also. Will be interesting to see
numbers even if I need to buy a few sets to do it.. There will always be
something better. I'm not brand dependent anymore. </DIV>
<DIV>As for them being practice packs, well I have for sets of 5350's, and I'd
like to fly 6 or 7 flights sometimes. I don't mind charging at the field, but
lately I haven't as I've been working on setup. Therefore even if the packs
weren't up to snuff, they'd still make good practice packs.. And I never said
anything about glow, or that it's lacking anything. </DIV>
<DIV>E-Glow, who cares. We all share a common love for the same sport.</DIV>
<DIV>Can't we all just get along? lol</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>C</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>chris moon <cjm767driver@hotmail.com></I></B>
wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<STYLE>.hmmessage P {
        PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY.hmmessage {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
No, the True batteries seem to hold voltage better under load (similar
<BR>to the TP Extremes V1) and give a little more power than the Pro-Lites.
<BR>I think Jim is saying that there is enough power difference that you
<BR>need to have different throttle settings (stick position) between the
<BR>True packs and the Pro-Lites. As far as the "c" ratings, all I know is
<BR>that the packs come down at maybe 90 degrees after a normal flight and
<BR>to me this means that we are not stressing them to any great extent so
<BR>the published "c" rating does not seem to preclude us from using them.
<BR>True R/C posts a discharge graph where they are discharging them at over
<BR>100 amps. But who knows, they might be good for 200 cycles or 25 - we
<BR>just don't know. So far it seems like worth experimenting with them to
<BR>see. Especially for the price. Remember though that we are comparing
<BR>them to our Pro-Lites that have in excess of 100 cycles already so the
<BR>comparison is already not really fair.<BR><BR>Chris<BR><BR>krishlan
fitzsimmons wrote:<BR>> Do these packs have the wrong rating's or
something?<BR>> Up to 50A Continuous 75A Max burst and they look to be
10c packs? Is <BR>> this correct?<BR>> And they're a little heavier,
and somehow they're more powerful.. Not <BR>> sure I buy into it. And
believe me, I would like to buy into it. <BR>> Perhaps the price is
making folks overlook certain things?<BR>> Not trying to start anything,
heck, I'll probably get a set of two to <BR>> test. Probably good
practice packs anyway. And I could use more of <BR>> those. lol<BR>>
I'd like to see numbers on motors with these vs other brands. Would be
<BR>> interesting for us all.<BR>> Chris<BR>><BR>> */Nat Penton
/* wrote:<BR>><BR>> Jim<BR>> If I interpet you correctly you are
getting less power from the<BR>> TrueRC than the ProLites ? Cris is
getting more ? Nat<BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>
*From:* James Oddino <MAILTO:JODDINO@SOCAL.RR.COM><BR>> *To:* NSRCA
Mailing List <MAILTO:NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.F3A.US><BR>> *Sent:* Friday,
March 28, 2008 6:11 PM<BR>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] True RC
batteries<BR>><BR>> I've had the same results as Chris. I'm having
some problem<BR>> going back and forth between the Prolites and the
TrueRC due<BR>> to the difference in power and am thinking about a second
set.<BR>> I've been putting it off as the batteries seem to get
better<BR>> every day. Mine weigh 41.6 ounces, 41.8 with the adapters
to<BR>> the TP balancer which I normally leave on the packs.<BR>> I'm
up to 199 flights on the Dualsky 6360 with no perceivable<BR>> change in
performance. It has never been out of the plane. I<BR>> love this
Electric Stuff.<BR>><BR>> Jim O<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> On Mar
28, 2008, at 7:31 AM, chris moon wrote:<BR>>> I have one set and
another on the way right now. My pack has<BR>>> 15 cycles<BR>>>
so far and is performing great. It comes down after a flight<BR>>>
cooler<BR>>> than my Pro-Lites (125 cycles) and Flight Power (85
cycles)<BR>>> packs. Of<BR>>> course it is not fair to compare a
new pack with older ones<BR>>> but so far<BR>>> it is out
performing them in the air also with noticeably<BR>>> more
power.<BR>>> They are heavier however at 43oz once you put the 2
packs<BR>>> together and<BR>>> add a connector. Your mileage may
vary, but so far mine has<BR>>> been good<BR>>> enough that I
ordered the 2nd set.<BR>>><BR>>> Chris<BR>>><BR>>>
Stuart Chale wrote:<BR>>> > Its been a little quiet so I thought I
would ask about these.<BR>>> > I think someone mentioned them
before but they are back in<BR>>> stock.<BR>>> > $110 for
5S1P 5000mah packs 585 gms.<BR>>> >
http://home.comcast.net/~truerc/ready_pack/ready_packs.htm<BR>>>
<HTTP: home.comcast.net %7Etruerc ready_pack ready_packs.htm><BR>>>
> Has anyone tried these? Less than half the cost of the high
end<BR>>> > competition.<BR>>> > Stuart<BR>>>
><BR>>> >
_______________________________________________<BR>>> >
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>> >
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>
<MAILTO:NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>>> >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>>>
><BR>>> ><BR>>> ><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>>
Watch "Cause Effect," a show about real people making a real<BR>>>
difference. Learn more.<BR>>> <HTTP: im.live.com Messenger IM MTV
?source="text_watchcause"><BR>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>
<MAILTO:NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>><BR>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>><BR>><BR>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>
Special deal for Yahoo! users & friends - No Cost. Get a month of
<BR>> Blockbuster Total Access <BR>> <HTTP: us.rd.yahoo.com
evt="47521/*http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text3.com"><BR>>
now<BR>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR><BR><BR>
<HR>
In a rush? <A
href="http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_realtime_042008"
target=_new>Get real-time answers with Windows Live Messenger.</A>
_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR></MAILTO:NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG></MAILTO:NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG></MAILTO:NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.F3A.US></MAILTO:JODDINO@SOCAL.RR.COM><BR><BR>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face="comic sans ms" color=#0000bf size=3>Chris
</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
Like movies? Here's a limited-time offer: <A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47522/*http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text4.com">Blockbuster
Total Access</A> for one month at no cost.
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>