<div>I was going to tell Adrian his thumbs cause this.. <IMG src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/04.gif"></div> <div>Just kidding of course Adrian..</div> <div> </div> <div>C<BR><BR><B><I>Nat Penton <natpenton@centurytel.net></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Where is Bryan when you need him <G><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: <ADRIANCWONG@EARTHLINK.NET><BR>To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.F3A.US><BR>Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:17 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming<BR><BR><BR>> Bryan,<BR>><BR>> What cause the plane to pull to the belly on one rudder, and to the canopy <BR>> on the other rudder during knife edge.<BR>><BR>> Thx,<BR>><BR>> Adrian<BR>><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>>>From: shinden1@cox.net<BR>>>Sent: Mar 16, 2008 7:17 PM<BR>>>To:
NSRCA Mailing List <NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming<BR>>><BR>>>Lance you need to find out exactly where the wing inc . is.<BR>>>I think if you move your c/g back a little it will help take some of the <BR>>>up trim out But you prob need more pos inc, in the wing so we need to know <BR>>>where you are at right now to determine exactly where to go<BR>>>Bryan<BR>>>---- Lance Van Nostrand <PATTERNDUDE@TX.RR.COM>wrote:<BR>>>> Bryan,<BR>>>><BR>>>> The discussion list moves faster than I can try this stuff out. Too bad <BR>>>> I<BR>>>> have to work...<BR>>>><BR>>>> I first only moved my CG forward significantly and have improved overall<BR>>>> tracking. It was windy Saturday and wind penetration were good. <BR>>>> Bryan's<BR>>>> suggestion was correct on CG movement to make this
improvement. However<BR>>>> with the forward CG (and resultant uptrim) it pulls to the canopy <BR>>>> slightly<BR>>>> on downlines. At this point I noticed that during inverted flight, <BR>>>> rudder<BR>>>> input caused a pull to the belly (plane rose). This was weird. I then<BR>>>> raised the incidence 2 turns and it fixed the inverted flight problem <BR>>>> but it<BR>>>> seemed to make the canopy pull worse. Interestingly, KE flight was not<BR>>>> noticeably affected.<BR>>>><BR>>>> The other affect is that inverted 45 downlines drop toward earth faster <BR>>>> than<BR>>>> upright 45s (which track nicely). Before this change, both 45s were <BR>>>> fine.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Is this the expectation?<BR>>>><BR>>>> --Lance<BR>>>><BR>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>>>>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>>>_______________________________________________<BR>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>><BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>> <BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR><DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face="comic sans ms" color=#0000bf size=3>Chris </FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV><p> 
<hr size=1>Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ "> Try it now.</a>