<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have become aware of several different situations
where airplanes that measure identical simply don't respond alike. Not my
observation but the consensus of pilot's whose judgment I trust. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>There are some airplanes that are very sensitive to
CG changes while identical models seem to be unaffected by major
changes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I can only conclude that nobody has all the
answers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>John Ferrell W8CCW<BR> <BR>"All that is necessary
for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -- Edmund Burke<BR><A
href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com
href="mailto:homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com">krishlan fitzsimmons</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, March 08, 2008 9:04
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] the joy
of trim</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>My whole reason for finally joining this list was to learn.. Don't seem
to do that much on the forums.. And the funny thing is, that the problem I'm
having right now, is the setup on my Abbra.. Therefore making me sell it. I
just can't get it right, and I don't know what's wrong.. I know it's an
awesome plane, because I've seen all of Jerry Budd's.. And they all fly
great.. I know someone could set it up correctly.. Just not me apparently..
I've set up many planes to a decent liking before. But I just can't get this
one right.. I've got alot to learn and no teachers around.. I was going to go
to the nats for the first time this year, but it makes it difficult to shoot
for top 10 in Masters like it is.. If it was properly setup, I think it's
achievable though.. I know I have the skills, just not the setup.. </DIV>
<DIV>Hopefully I can get with Jerry then at some point.. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Chris<BR><BR><B><I>Lance Van Nostrand
<patterndude@tx.rr.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Bryan,<BR>I
have been anticipating your response but now it seems it won't be coming
<BR>soon. Maybe we can take this offline. There's no way anyone could
<BR>interpret my response as being argumentative and I know your are tough
<BR>enough to take a few pin pricks without flinching. Certainly I have my
own <BR>experiences and opinions but those are completely set aside. I
believe <BR>there are always at least 10 correct answers to any modeling
question but <BR>each answer is right within its own context.<BR><BR>In
other words, I start from 0-0 and have my trim process advance from there
<BR>and usually get very good results. I think, if I remember correctly your
<BR>old KF article and our live discussions, you start from 1/2 degree
positive <BR>inc in wing and stab and advance from there. Since I know your
path is <BR>different from mine I am trying to learn from you. this is why I
question <BR>and ask for deeper explanation. Maybe it's just not there. The
answer <BR>might be "I never tested in a wind tunnel, can't explain why it
works, but <BR>it does so just try it and enjoy." But I hate to see you bow
out when <BR>someone asks for more details. that makes Krishlan's comment
seem relevant <BR>when, knowing how much you help others and contribute to
this sport, it <BR>shouldn't be.<BR><BR>--Lance<BR><BR>----- Original
Message ----- <BR>From: <SHINDEN1@COX.NET><BR>To: "NSRCA Mailing List"
<NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 5:32
PM<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] the joy of trim<BR><BR><BR>> Ok
Matt<BR>> I accept, your probably right ..<BR>><BR>> I will now bow
out of the discussion it`s not going anywhere and I`m <BR>> waiting my
time trying to inform, it seems all the people I`ve helped <BR>>
accomplish what I`m preaching have quit the sport or they are scared to
<BR>> write !!<BR>> I`ll leave you with this ,<BR>> demand of
perfection is different by each persons ability and goals,<BR>> sometimes
we deceive ourselves in thinking we kow it all or<BR>> we get caught up
in out wording every one and talking nonsense ,, then no <BR>> one gets
anything out of the conversation<BR>> and then, you die of a thousand pin
pricks<G><BR>> I can remember sharing pos inc setup with Nat on numerous
occasions and <BR>> Nat out worded me and proved me wrong on paper and
you know he can ,, in a <BR>> Popeye Fried chicken House of all
places,<BR>> However I find out years Later he now uses My setup I`m
proud <G><BR>> ok ,I`ll stop beating a dead horse I know better than to
start this<BR>><BR>> carry on<BR>> Bryan<BR>><BR>> ----
rcmaster199@aol.com wrote:<BR>>>
Bryan,<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
I respectfully disagree on the upline, full power issue. The downline is
<BR>>> a totally different trim situation because the vectors involved
are <BR>>>
different<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
MattK<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>>><BR>>> From: Nat
Penton<BR>>><BR>>> To: NSRCA Mailing
List<BR>>><BR>>> Sent: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 7:16
pm<BR>>><BR>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] the joy of
trim<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
I'm thinking, I'm thinking ----- Original Message ----- From: <BR>>>
shinden1@cox.net> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <BR>>>
nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:53 PM
<BR>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] the joy of trim > Matt, I refer
back to <BR>>> my earlier post > thrust is not the issue. > wing
inc. will always <BR>>> trump thrust,, in power and influence over
vertical > lines. > thrust <BR>>> is a" very fine tune" issue it
should not be used to adjust > tracking <BR>>> issues > >
jump in Nat ,, why do you not need down thrust on your <BR>>> design??
> Bryan > ---- rcmaster199@aol.com wrote: >> If the model
<BR>>> pulls to canopy on a�FULL POWER�vertical upline and you
>> reduce <BR>>> downthrust, the problem will worsen. You need
to add downthrust >> <BR>>> (about 1 degree initially, and more
if needed). I would not mess with CG, <BR>>> >> at least not
yet. >> >> >> � >> >> >> Horizontal
flight places <BR>>> quite a load on the wing....the wing must lift
>> the load accordingly. <BR>>> Vertical flight removes the load
therefore whatever >> trim was found <BR>>> in horizontal flight
will affect the vertical flight. The >> simplest <BR>>> fix is
downthrust addition for the condition Mike references, >> but
<BR>>> assumes that the model is close to begin with. >>
>> >> � >> >> >> <BR>>> Downline
flight (NO POWER) is a totally different trim scenario and may <BR>>>
>> indeed require wing/stab inc adjustment and CG adjustment. >>
>> >> <BR>>> � >> >> >> It should be
understood�that it is an iterative process to <BR>>> get "perfect"
>> trim. >> >> >> � >> >> >>
MattK >> >> >> >> <BR>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: J N <BR>>> Hiller >> >> To: NSRCA
Mailing List >> >> Sent: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:33 <BR>>> am
>> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] YS Questions+more - Rolls
>> <BR>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> The airplane may be flying
<BR>>> with positive trim. Try reducing the down >> thrust or
move the CG <BR>>> back. >> >> >> If it doesnt help
put it back. >> >> >> Jim Hiller <BR>>> >>
>> >> � >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: <BR>>>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org >> <BR>>>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Michael
<BR>>> >> Wickizer >> >> Sent: Friday, March 07,
2008 8:19 AM >> >> To: <BR>>> NSRCA Mailing List >>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] YS <BR>>> Questions+more -
Rolls >> >> >> � >> >> >> Bryan:
>> >> � >> >> <BR>>> I agree that the plane
doesn't know which direction it's flying, but then <BR>>> >> why
will a plane fly straight and level then pull to the canopy in <BR>>>
>> uplines?� This has been driving Brett and me crazy for over a
year.� <BR>>> >> Admittedly, it a much shorter drive for me:)
>> >> � >> >> Mike <BR>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Date: Thu, 6 Mar <BR>>> 2008
23:13:48 -0500 >> >> > From: shinden1@cox.net >>
>> > To: <BR>>> nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org >>
>> > Subject: Re: <BR>>> [NSRCA-discussion] YS Questions+more
- Rolls >> >> > >> >> > Chris ,, <BR>>>
the airplane does not know it`s flying horizontal or vertical >>
>> > <BR>>> the wings are still lifting whether up or down
that s why we can use >> <BR>>> > the vertical up or down to
test this problem , >> >> > Bryan >> >>
<BR>>> > ---- krishlan fitzsimmons homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> >> <BR>>> > > Lance, >> >>
> > >> >> > > Just a thought though, if going
<BR>>> straight up, up straight down, aren't >> > > the up
and down ailerons <BR>>> both inducing equal drag, no lift? I've
>> > > often wondered if our <BR>>> straight up test is
actually a perfect test for >> > > this. It is for <BR>>>
our up and down lines, but what about our 45's or >> > >
horizontals <BR>>> where we do indeed have lift on the low aileron and
drag >> > > on the <BR>>> other? This would create a
different condition I'm guessing.. >> > > <BR>>> Probably
small, but still a little different because as I mention, >> >
<BR>>> > both create drag on the up or downline.. Still, it's the
best test we <BR>>> >> > > have I guess.. >>
>> > > >> >> > > Chris >> >> >
> >> >> > <BR>>> > Lance Van Nostrand
patterndude@tx.rr.com> wrote: >> >> > > This
<BR>>> thread is timely because I've been experimenting with >>
> > <BR>>> differential >> >> > > recently on
a new design that seems to need it. <BR>>> Never needed it >>
> > before on a >> >> > > pattern plane but now I
<BR>>> might. My test is to fly very high, point the >> >
> nose >> >> > > <BR>>> directly at the ground
and roll pure aileron. Plane should be axial, >> <BR>>> >
> but >> >> > > remember that axial is along the
vertical CG, which <BR>>> may not be a line >> > > that
>> >> > > pierces the wing LE/TE. You <BR>>> need to
do it a few times to be sure that >> > > their >> >>
> > is <BR>>> an axis that everything rotates around and that
line is straight. >> > <BR>>> > If it >> >>
> > wobbles, then we have an issue. Another way to <BR>>>
determine this is to >> > > do >> >> > >
unlimited rolls while flying <BR>>> straight up. If the airplane
>> > > consistently arcs >> >> > > off
<BR>>> its vertical line, you have a problem. >> >> >
> >> >> > > <BR>>> Aerodynamics suggests two
contributors. One is that the lowered >> > > <BR>>>
aileron >> >> > > increases the lift of the airfoil and
lift creates <BR>>> drag so this wing >> > > may >>
>> > > pull the plane off axis. the <BR>>> other is that
the spiral slipstream of >> > > the prop >> >> >
> is <BR>>> pushing down on the right wing and up on the left so
up/right >> > > <BR>>> aileron is >> >> >
> more effective than up/left and down/left is more <BR>>>
effective than >> > > down/right. >> >> > >
>> >> > > The overall <BR>>> effect for most pattern
planes is minimal and usually >> > > ignorable, <BR>>>
>> >> > > but on IMAC style planes these factors can be
significant and <BR>>> the >> > > resulting >>
>> > > differential corrections may need to <BR>>> be
adjusted with something as >> > > simple as >> >>
> > a prop <BR>>> change (from 3 blade to 2 for example).
>> >> > > >> >> > > the <BR>>>
correction of course is to start playing with aileron >> > >
<BR>>> differential. >> >> > > Given the
contributors I've suggested, its not <BR>>> a given which way you
>> > > go with >> >> > > the differential to
<BR>>> correct the problem and the answer might not even >> >
> be >> >> > > <BR>>> symmetrical. >>
>> > > >> >> > > Note that contributor #1
above will <BR>>> change if you are flying upright >> > >
or >> >> > > inverted, so it <BR>>> would seem that
a correction for upright flight would >> > > simply >>
<BR>>> >> > > exacerbate inverted flight, but contributor
#2 is the same for any <BR>>> >> > > flight >>
>> > > mode but is throttle dependent. >> >> >
> >> <BR>>> >> > > --Lance >> >> >
> >> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>
<BR>>> >> > > From: "Koenig, Tom" >> >> >
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" >> >> > <BR>>> > Sent:
Thursday, March 06, 2008 4:45 PM >> >> > > Subject: Re:
<BR>>> [NSRCA-discussion] YS Questions+more - Rolls >> >>
> > >> >> > > >> <BR>>> >> >
> > My head is spinning!!! The more I think about this, the more
<BR>>> >> > > > questions I >> >> > >
> have.........rather than answers! >> <BR>>> >> >
> > >> >> > > > Maybe the contra rotating prop
set up on a Voodoo <BR>>> X( Nat??) maybe >> > > > the
>> >> > > > answer?? >> >> > > >
>> <BR>>> >> > > > I still 'feel', that the best
rolls I get are with a 0 <BR>>> differential >> > > >
set >> >> > > > up-BUT- somehow I 'drive' that
<BR>>> wing to 0 ( or should that be some >> > > > sort
>> >> > > > of <BR>>> equilibrium??) during the
rolls. Certainly in my case, it seems >> > > <BR>>> >
to be >> >> > > > Pilot dependant!!! >> >>
> > > I'm starting to <BR>>> think that my rudder control has
turned to the >> >> > > > proverbial <BR>>>
trying to micro analyse what's happening! >> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Tom <BR>>> >> >> >
> > >> >> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > > > From: <BR>>>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org >> >> > > >
<BR>>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
>> >> > <BR>>> > > shinden1@cox.net >>
>> > > > Sent: Friday, 7 March 2008 9:15 AM >>
<BR>>> >> > > > To: NSRCA Mailing List >>
>> > > > Subject: Re: <BR>>> [NSRCA-discussion] YS
Questions+more - Rolls >> >> > > > >> >>
> > > <BR>>> what happens on a 4piont? >> >> >
> > Bryan >> >> > > > ---- Del <BR>>>
Rykert wrote: >> >> > > >> The general consensus has
been that the <BR>>> faster moving molecules >> > >
>> over >> >> > > > the top surface <BR>>>
don't require as big as a deflection as the aileron >> > > >
that >> <BR>>> >> > > > deflects towards the
bottom of the plane. What one tries to <BR>>> achieve >> >
> > is >> >> > > > the plane tracks as purely
straight <BR>>> on a string as possible while >> > > >
one >> >> > > > rolls both <BR>>> directions
without introducing any yaw. >> >> > > >> >>
>> > > >> Del <BR>>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > > >> <BR>>> From: >> >>
> > >> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" >> >> > >
>> Sent: <BR>>> Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:49 PM >>
>> > > >> Subject: Re: <BR>>> [NSRCA-discussion] YS
Questions+more - Rolls >> >> > > >> >>
>> > > <BR>>> >> >> >> > >
>> > Nat and all you other aerodynamicists, >> >> >
> >> <BR>>> > >> >> > > >> > I
thought that the rational for "aileron differential" <BR>>> was that
>> >> > > > upward deflection causes more drag than
downward <BR>>> deflection so to >> >> > > >
equalize drag and prevent yaw with aileron <BR>>> deflection, aileron
>> >> > > > differential is needed. It seems that
<BR>>> you guys are now saying that >> >> > > >
ain't so. Please elaborate. <BR>>> >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > >> > George >>
>> > > >> > >> >> > > >>
<BR>>> > ---- Nat Penton wrote: >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > >> > =============
<BR>>> >> >> > > >> > IMO center hinged or
top hinged is OK. With top hinge, to <BR>>> >> > >
>> > achieve >> >> > > > equal vertical travel
of the trailing <BR>>> edge requires different >> > > >
angular >> >> > > > travel, up vs <BR>>> down.
The objective is zero aerodynamic differential. >> >> > >
>> > <BR>>> >> >> > > >> > Ron I
don't think a fairing would prevent separation but, <BR>>> how
>> > > >> > are >> >> > > > you
able to fair the gap using the <BR>>> top hinge ? Nat >>
>> > > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >>
>> > > <BR>>> >> > From: ronlock@comcast.net
>> >> > > >> > To: NSRCA Mailing List
<BR>>> >> >> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, March
06, 2008 7:20 AM >> >> > > >> > <BR>>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] YS Questions+more - Rolls >> >>
> > >> <BR>>> > >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> > And while your at it, I'd
appreciate <BR>>> some discussion of the >> > > >>
> impact >> >> > > > of the top <BR>>> hinge
system as seen on Viavat, and Prestige birds - >> > > > (top
>> <BR>>> >> > > > hinged, with fairing that
eliminates the gap at deflection) >> <BR>>> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > >> > Thanks, Ron Lockhart
>> >> > > >> > >> <BR>>> >>
> > >> > -------------- Original message --------------
>> >> > > <BR>>> >> > From:
vicenterc@comcast.net >> >> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > Nat, <BR>>> >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > > >> > Could you
explain why the differential <BR>>> should be different for >>
>> > > > non-center hinged? I understand <BR>>> that
the mechanical configuration >> > > > of >> >>
> > > non-center <BR>>> hinged requires differential to
obtain same travel in >> > > > both >> <BR>>>
>> > > > directions. However, the travel up and down should
be close to <BR>>> >> > > > equal. >> >>
> > >> > >> >> > > >> > Thanks,
>> >> > > >> <BR>>> > >> >>
> > >> > -- >> >> > > >> > Vicente
"Vince" Bortone >> >> > <BR>>> > >> >
>> >> > > >> > -------------- Original message
-------------- <BR>>> >> >> > > >> > From:
"Nat Penton" >> >> > > >> > >> >>
> > >> > Tom <BR>>> >> >> > >
>> > It's just something that is peculiar to the Southern >>
<BR>>> >> > > > Hemisphere. >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > >> > Changing wing
<BR>>> incidence will not help. Unless things are really >>
>> > > > screwed <BR>>> up , at our roll rates,
centrifugal forces are too low to >> >> > > >
<BR>>> cause a problem. You want zero differential, aero speaking (
same >> >> <BR>>> > > > up/down if center hinged
). >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >
>> > I <BR>>> find the best check is the fast half-roll in
the vertical up. >> >> > > <BR>>> > Regards Nat
>> >> > > >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > > <BR>>> >> > From: Koenig, Tom
>> >> > > >> > To: NSRCA Mailing List >>
>> > <BR>>> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 05,
2008 7:24 PM >> >> > > >> > Subject: <BR>>>
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] YS Questions+more >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > >> <BR>>> >
>> >> > > >> > Hi Troy! >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > > >> > Thanks for
<BR>>> the info. I thought you would be toiling away on >>
>> > > > the next <BR>>> developmental stage of these
engines!! >> >> > > >> > >> >> >
> >> > <BR>>> Hopefully soon, I can find the time to get
flying again. I am >> >> > > <BR>>> > looking
forward to running this little beast. I am still a little >>
<BR>>> >> > > > concerned in keeping it quiet though.
>> >> > > >> > >> >> >
<BR>>> > >> > Four blade props? I have some of the 18.1 x
12 two bladers >> >> <BR>>> > > > but I just cant
see how I'll shut the thing up with these paint >> <BR>>>
>> > > > stirrers?? >> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > Also-one more <BR>>>
question to any of you out there in pattern >> >> > > >
land. >> >> > <BR>>> > >> > >>
>> > > >> > I have struggled with aileron differential
for <BR>>> years. I am >> >> > > > just not happy
with the rolls. I have tried <BR>>> various design >> > >
> fixes-but >> >> > > > about the only one that
<BR>>> seems to work is to get the wing back to >> > >
> 0-0 ( >> >> > > > <BR>>> which can be
achieved by a few ways, design, mix or thumbs) >> > > >
<BR>>> Differential >> >> > > > itself does not
seem to work if the wing is <BR>>> POA ( well...it works >> >
> > for >> >> > > > half the roll !) >>
<BR>>> >> > > >> > Another black magic fix
appears to be to run parallel >> >> <BR>>> > > >
ailerons-but this only 'sorta' seems to fix it. I like the feel of
<BR>>> >> >> > > > equal% chord ailerons however.
>> >> > > >> > >> >> > >
<BR>>> >> > I am frustrated with it-I like my planes to roll
as if they >> >> <BR>>> > > > had a string up its
...........well you know! >> >> > > >> > >>
<BR>>> >> > > >> > OK-any 'secrets' I need to
know??? Very good elevator work <BR>>> >> >> > >
>> > fixes it ( hence my 0-0 comment) >> >> > >
>> > >> >> <BR>>> > > >> > Tom
>> >> > > >> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > >> <BR>>> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>>> >> >> > > >> > ---- >>
>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > <BR>>>
_______________________________________________ >> >> > >
>> > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> >>
> > >> > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
>> >> > > >> > <BR>>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> >>
> > >> > <BR>>> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> <BR>>> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>>> >> >> > > >> > ---------- >>
>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > <BR>>> >> >
_______________________________________________ >> >> > >
>> > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> >>
> > >> > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
>> >> > > >> > <BR>>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> >>
> > >> > <BR>>>
_______________________________________________ >> >> > >
>> > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> >>
> > >> > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
>> >> > > >> > <BR>>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> >>
> > >> > <BR>>> >> >> > > >
>> >> > > > <BR>>>
_______________________________________________ >> >> > >
> <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> >> > >
> <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org >> >> >
> > <BR>>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> >>
> > > <BR>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > <BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> > > > <BR>>>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org >> >> > > >
<BR>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >> > > >> <BR>>> >> > >
_______________________________________________ >> >> > >
<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> >> > >
<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org >> >> > >
<BR>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >> > > >> <BR>>> >> > >
>> >> > > >> >> > > Chris >>
>> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >
<BR>>> >> >> > > >> >> > >
>> >> > > --------------------------------- >>
<BR>>> >> > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your
homepage. >> >> > <BR>>>
_______________________________________________ >> >> >
<BR>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> >> >
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>>> >> >> >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> >>
<BR>>> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ <BR>>>
NSRCA-discussion mailing >> list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
>> <BR>>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> >
<BR>>> _______________________________________________ >
NSRCA-discussion <BR><BR>=== message truncated ===</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face="comic sans ms" color=#0000bf size=3>Chris
</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
Never miss a thing. <A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs">Make Yahoo
your homepage.</A>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>