<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHz</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>ONLY one? Airtronics is FHSS as well. The current offering isn’t overly pattern suitable, though I suspect that will change. Just making the point :):):)<BR>
<BR>
-Mark<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 3/2/08 2:51 PM, "Ed White" <edvwhite@sbcglobal.net> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Thanks guys for all the great input. Let me show you what really swayed me.<BR>
<BR>
<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=789547">http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=789547</a><BR>
<BR>
I'm going with the Futaba FASST because clearly its the only one that truly is spread spectrum. I'm not pretending to be a EE here, but intuitively to me if you are going to use this band, which is getting increasingly crowded, you ought to be frequency hopping for real and it looks to me like Futaba is the only one doing that.<BR>
<BR>
Ed<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="95%"></SPAN></FONT><FONT FACE="Consolas, Courier New, Courier"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>_______________________________________________<BR>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>