<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<STYLE>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1555" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=hmmessage>
<DIV><SPAN class=770015323-12022008><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=3>Aren't
districts holding local recertification classes again? I think this was done
last at a contest in D3?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P><FONT
size=2>Regards,<BR>Jason<BR>www.jasonshulman.com<BR>www.shulmanaviation.com<BR>www.composite-arf.com</FONT>
</P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Joe
Lachowski<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:13 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
NSRCA Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Recertification
for the Nats<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>New sequences shouldn't be a reason to need
recertification. And if there are only a couple of changes in the rules, they
can easily be addressed at the pilots meeting. I also don't feel like coughing
up cash at a local seminar and having to sit through this stuff again a
year later just because FAI had some minor changes. And I have no
intention of sitting through it at the Nats when I could be off somewhere
getting the practice I so desperately need. Then again, I'd be happy to be
relegated to judging an AMA class instead of FAI for a change of
pace.<g><BR><BR>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:39:32 -0500<BR>> From:
rickwallace45@gmail.com<BR>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Recertification for the Nats<BR>> <BR>>
According to the NSRCA membership database, for those who certified<BR>>
last year both the AMA and FAI certifications expire on 12/31/08.<BR>> Are
there new FAI rules for '09? Thought the Sporting Code was<BR>> unchanged
from last year?<BR>> <BR>> Agree that an annual refresher is always a
good idea, but based on the<BR>> above, is there a requirement for FAI
recertification for those who<BR>> certified a year ago?<BR>> <BR>>
... and is Don still the Judging Committee chief?<BR>> <BR>> Thanks
-<BR>> Rick<BR>> <BR>> On Feb 12, 2008 11:32 AM, Derek Koopowitz
<derekkoopowitz@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>> > I'm assuming yes... since
there are new sequences/rules for FAI this year.<BR>> ><BR>>
><BR>> ><BR>> > On Feb 12, 2008 7:44 AM, Joe Lachowski
<jlachow@hotmail.com> wrote:<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>>
> ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > Does one need to get recertified
for judging FAI at the Nats this year if<BR>> > one was certified last
year?<BR>> > ><BR>> > > It does get confusing when the FAI
and AMA changes are not in synch with<BR>> > each other.<BR>> >
><BR>> > ><BR>> > >
________________________________<BR>> > Need to know the score, the
latest news, or you need your Hotmail(R)-get your<BR>> > "fix". Check it
out.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >
_______________________________________________<BR>> > >
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>> > >
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> > >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>> >
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >
_______________________________________________<BR>> > NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> > NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>> >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>> ><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR><BR>
<HR>
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. <A
href="http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008"
target=_new>Get it now!</A> </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>