<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed topic to killing Masters?</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3243" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: " bgColor=#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE id=0><LABEL id=HbSession SessionId="2756297012"></LABEL>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Uh, you just think your staying out of this
thread! LOL</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=atwoodm@paragon-inc.com href="mailto:atwoodm@paragon-inc.com">Mark
Atwood</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 04, 2008 11:41
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed
topic to killing Masters?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px">Offlist...<BR><BR>You’re alive! :) I’m staying
the hell out of this thread. I’ll get people pissed at me. But
what good is winning a class if the only reason you won is because the guy
that’s better than you didn’t show up??? WTF??
<BR><BR>Anyway...another story for another day.<BR><BR>What’s the scoop on
control horns?<BR><BR>-Mark<BR><BR><BR>On 2/4/08 11:03 AM, "Jerry Stebbins"
<<A
href="mailto:JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net">JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR></SPAN></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT face=Arial>After reading a
bunch of the posts I have a couple questions. <BR>1. Since Masters is the
destination class for all of AMA Pattern, how can it be "TOO difficult"??,
that is what it should be!!<BR>I can understand problems with "kinds of
maneuvers" like "rollers", too many/multiple "snaps",etc. as in FAI, that
make the plane designs need to be more maneuver specific. Those
aspects are controllable by specific constraints written into the Sequence
Process Development Documentation.<BR>2. I recognize there are pilots that
do not have the resources (time/money/mentors), or the inclination to
spend the time it takes to "Master Masters". That is an individual
circumstance that each of us has to handle. How does making the sequences
easier so more pilots can get higher scores with less effort become a
viable solution, instead of defeating the "best of the best" status of the
Masters class. <BR> If the AMA Membership flying Pattern (mostly
NSRCA) wants to provide a class to accommodate those circumstances, then
what will be the litmus test of "having enough of X<Y<Z<" to
force them into the Masters class, or qualify for the pre-Masters class.
Try to put that into an equation that all would deem "fair and equitable".
I would suggest if that is what it takes to eliminate the yearly trek back
through all this discussion-with no substantive changes- let a body of
those concerned come up with an
analysis/study/evaluation/findings/recommendations/rules by which it can
be discussed and voted upon. <BR>Asbestos jacket
on<BR>Jerry<BR></FONT></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>----- Original Message -----
<BR> <BR><B>From:</B> vicenterc@comcast.net
<BR> <BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List <A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></A>
<BR> <BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, February 03, 2008 9:49
PM<BR> <BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed
topic to killing Masters?<BR> <BR><BR> <BR>In
conclusion, as Joe said, we need to make sure that we do something
to "limit the creep in sequence difficulty that has been occurring
in the Masters class". For sure this will make easier for
Advanced pilots to move up to Masters. If some of the
Masters pilots want more level we need to add another class or
they need to go and fly FAI-F3A.
<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>--<BR>Vicente "Vince"
Bortone<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR></FONT></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">-------------- Original message
-------------- <BR>From: Bob Kane <getterflash@yahoo.com>
<BR> <BR>My sentiments are in line with Joe's . . . .
. . <BR> <BR> <BR>Bob Kane<BR>getterflash@yahoo.com
<BR><BR><BR> <BR>----- Original Message ----<BR>From:
Joe Lachowski <jlachow@hotmail.com><BR>To: NSRCA Mailing
List <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Sunday,
February 3, 2008 1:20:19 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
changed topic to killing Masters?<BR><BR> We've voted
on this several times already in the past and the answer is
always NO. <BR> <BR>You will lose half the Masters pilots.
Guarantee I'll be gone. We need to limit the creep in sequence
difficulty that has been occuring. I don't know about you guys,
but I don't like having the international community dictating to
us what we fly here in the US. You want to fly FAI sequences, go
fly FAI and take your lumps. You know we have beaten this
subject to death a number of times already. I'm tired of it
already.<BR> <BR>As far as the so called professional
pilots willing to participate in local contests, as a CD, if
they don't support the local level contests, you just eliminate
the class an save some money. That should send a clear signal. I
really don't think making changes for getting more of the
so called professionals involved will amount to anything. The
vast majority of top pilots do participate in local events. Th!
ere are very few who chose not to. I think I can count them on
one hand. Heck, maybe a couple of
fingers.<g><BR> <BR>Why is there such a huge Masters class?
Most Masters pilots either don't have the skill or time to
master rolling circles and integrated rollers in a sequence to
move up to FAI. Face it, we like to consider ourselves
perfectionists at what we do. Who wants to go to a contest and
hack through a manuever that could potentially be a crash
experience. Masters is a great success as it is. Leave it
alone.<BR> <BR>There was mention of sequence length. We can
adjust Masters if we wanted to to shorten the sequence. By the
way the current sequence is a little long, but the 09' sequence
is definitely shorter in time
length.<BR><BR><BR> <BR></FONT></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">From: GAA@owt.com<BR>To:
nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us<BR>Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008
08:43:58 -0800<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed
topic to killing Masters?<BR><BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">I disagree with
Master flying the FAI P schedule. I think we should let the
membership vote on this issue and implement what the majority
want.<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">--Gordon<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us
[<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us]</A>
<B>On Behalf Of </B>vicenterc@comcast.net<BR><B>Sent:</B>
Sunday, February 03, 2008 8:18 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
johnfuqua@embarqmail.com; NSRCA Mailing List; 'NSRCA Mailing
List'<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed topic to
killing Masters?<BR></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>I
think the idea is that the destination class (if we changed to
FAI-F3A) will fly the F-Schedule also. I see very strong
advantages from judging point of view. Both classes
Masters and FAI-F3A will know the P schedule really well since
both are flying the same maneuvers. I expect that the
judging level is going to be improved. Yes, the Masters
pilots will need to learn the F-Schedule. Finally, I
think more professional pilots will be willing to participate
in local contests because we will have more competition at the
FAI-F3A level. I think if we do this could be fun that
is the general
agreement.<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>Regards,<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>--<BR>Vicente
"Vince" Bortone<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR></FONT></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">-------------- Original
message -------------- <BR>From: "John Fuqua"
<johnfuqua@embarqmail.com>
<BR> <BR></FONT><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT
face=Arial>I have been following this discussion with some
relutance to jump in. As a current Masters pilot and old
time F3A flyer I to once pushed to have the Master schedule
be the P schedule. But you guys need to look at what
FAI has done to the P schedule. Here is link to the
F3A rules. <A
href="http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/documents/sc4">http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/documents/sc4</A>
<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>FAI has reduced the total maneuvers
to 19 including a non scored takeoff and landing.
AMA Master is 23 including a scored takeoff and
landing. <BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>Going to FAI would certainly speed
things up (which is what FAI intended for large contests
like WC to speed up the prelims and get to the real
contest).<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>Not sure this is what AMA/NSRCA
membership wants for a destination
class.<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>John<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]</A>
<B>On Behalf Of </B>Del Rykert<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday,
February 03, 2008 7:14 AM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing
List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed topic
to killing Masters?<BR></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>Hi Dave..<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT
face=Arial> <BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>I never saw anyone suggesting
to do away with the Masters class.. I have thought of
another restriction/factor. Some of the FAI maneuvers require
a specific designed plane to do them well. If you don't have
such an aircraft in your stable you can be looking at a
prohibitive change to switch to those type of planes or live
with the self imposed handicap. Granted, some of the best
can make a good showing in FAI type maneuvers but when
needing the 1 point advantage in a high K-Factor maneuver it
does drive the contestants to seek the best sled that works
for them. <BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial>A good friend pointed out
something I had lost sight of once. He acquired a
newer designed airplane to his stable that performed the
maneuvers he was flying so much easier. The design choice
alone was raising his scores by almost 1 point per maneuver.
With only a little bit of practice with new plane. He never
appreciated the handicap he self imposed until having better
equipment. Heck.. I still have coreless servos and not a digital
do I own.. How far behind am I? LOL.
<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT
face=Arial> Del</FONT></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR> <BR></FONT></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>----- Original
Message ----- <BR> <BR><B>From:</B> Dave Burton <A
href="mailto:burtona@atmc.net"><mailto:burtona@atmc.net></A>
<BR> <BR><B>To:</B> 'NSRCA Mailing List'
<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us></A>
<BR> <BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, February 02,
2008 7:33 PM<BR> <BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] F at
locals?<BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR></FONT></SPAN><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">Del, Ive never advocated doing
away with the Masters class. I only suggested adopting the
most current FAI P maneuver schedule and fly Masters as a
separate class as we do today. Masters pilots would not be
required to advance to the FAI class unless they chose to do so.
Seems to me like it solves several problems. It allows a
CD to have more flexibility in arranging flight lines, a
larger pool of knowledgeable judges, eliminates the need
for NSRCA (or others) to come up with a new schedule
periodically for the Masters Class. I dont think there is
any difference in the difficulty level of the P schedule
and the Masters schedule today and would not require any
greater skill level than Masters does today IMO.
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">Dave Burton<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B> Del
Rykert [<A
href="mailto:drykert2@rochester.rr.com]">mailto:drykert2@rochester.rr.com]</A>
<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 01, 2008 7:09
PM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] F at locals?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Hi
Dave<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">I'm
not trying to imply that I have the correct answer to that
question. Not all people that advance through the AMA
classes have the desire or deep pockets to handle being
competitive at the FAI level. Some Master fliers in the
past have told me the time commitment is high to be
competitive in FAI class. Higher than they can accept.
That may be the biggest reason. Not certain.
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">But
they do enjoy the difficulty and challenge of flying
masters and if told they had to move to FAI or if pointed
out and made to move up to FAI some would choose to leave.
I see it as part of the dues some are willing to commit to
play. Some drop out after making it to intermediate.
Others after reaching advanced. Some have stayed and still
fly those classes but r! eal! iz e the y don't have the time,
desire, money, to move up and be challenging or at least
make a decent showing they can accept for themselves. I
believe the competitive factor varies with us all and what
we are willing to commit to fly pattern.
<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">I'm
even suspect their are other issues that escape us and why
they are happy to fly Masters.
<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"> Del<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR></SPAN></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">----- Original
Message ----- <BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B> Dave Burton
<A
href="mailto:burtona@atmc.net"><mailto:burtona@atmc.net></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>To:</B> 'NSRCA
Mailing List' <A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>Sent:</B> Friday,
February 01, 2008 6:10 PM<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] F at locals?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">Del, whats the
difference between FAI type schedules and Masters
schedules? You are correct about previous proposals not
being accepted. I have submitted a rules change twice
for Masters to fly the P schedule and it was defeated
both times. Wont do that again, but I never understood
the opposition to it.<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org [<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]</A>
<B>On Behalf Of </B>Del Rykert<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday,
February 01, 2008 3:24 PM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing
List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F at
locals?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">So
it would be acceptable to you to drive some away from
pattern as it has been clearly stated that some Master
fliers by choice do not want to fly FAI type schedules.
It has been voted on with surveys and discussed on
this list in the past to not use that approach.
<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"> Del
<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">----- Original Message -----
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B> vicenterc@comcast.net
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List <A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 01, 2008 11:48
AM<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F at
locals?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR>I
believe that FAI rules states that it is required more than 2 days
event to fly F schedule. I am sure that someone out there is
going to be able to find if I am correct or not. Of course, we
can use the AMA rules and the CD can override this if he announces the
change with time.
<BR> <BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR>I
agree that in Masters we should fly the current P schedule. This
will make a natural transition when moving Masters to F3A. The
rules should be changed to make the F3A class the final
destination of AMA classes. In other worlds, Masters
should not be the final destination as it is
now.<BR> <BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR>--<BR>Vicente
"Vince"
Bortone<BR> <BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR>--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>From: "Tony"
<tony@radiosouthrc.com> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#000080><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Those are the
very reasons that I stopped flying FAI. The FAI rules state that
the F patterns are for Regional, National and International events,
and are not designed to be flown at a local contest.
<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
color=#000080><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Tony
Stillman, President<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Radio South,
Inc.<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">139 Altama Connector, Box
322<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Brunswick, GA
31525<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT
size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">1-800-962-7802<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">www.radiosouthrc.com <A
href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com/"><http://www.radiosouthrc.com/></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org [<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]</A>
<B>On Behalf Of </B>Anthony Romano<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February
01, 2008 8:36 AM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B>
[NSRCA-discussion] F at locals?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Another good point Jason. The
more that the F is flown and judged the better we all get at it. I can
fly Masters or the P with equal mediocrity but the F always just
scared me off. Maybe one of my goals for this year will be to learn
it. Now if everyone promises no laughing I might try it.<BR> From
comments I have hear a lot of guys just don't want to deal with
rollers.<BR> <BR>Anthony<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">From: jshulman@cfl.rr.com<BR>To:
nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008
19:08:38 -0500<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging by
committee?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Problem with that is that we're
finding that enough FAI guys don't want to fly F... so why hold 2 FAI-
P classes? I understand getting to know 1 sequence is easier to judge,
but the Masters and FAI guys should be able to have a handle on
the other class without much work. Its probably just me, but if
FAI were to fly both P and F, then having "Masters" fly P might be a
more Masters class this way. Then again, I may be off in left field,
or is this right? And since now both the Team Trials and Worlds pick
the winning teams at the end of the contest (after F) it would make
more sense to start flying F locally so it's not a shock come Nats
time.<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Regards,<BR>Jason<BR>www.jasonshulman.com <A
href="http://www.jasonshulman.com/"><http://www.jasonshulman.com/></A>
<BR>www.shulmanaviation.com <A
href="http://www.shulmanaviation.com/"><http://www.shulmanaviation.com/></A>
<BR>www.composite-arf.com <A
href="http://www.composite-arf.com/"><http://www.composite-arf.com/></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">-----Original
Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org [<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]</A><B>On
Behalf Of </B>Dave Burton<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 31, 2008
6:53 PM<BR><B>To:</B> 'NSRCA Mailing List'<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Judging by committee?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">There is a way to solve the peer judging
and several other problems with changing maneuver schedules for
Masters class.<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">Let Masters class fly the most current FAI
P schedule as a separate class. This provides a way that FAI
class can judge Masters and be completely familiar with the maneuvers
and Masters class can judge FAI and be completely familiar with the
schedule. Then the rules committee does not have to come up with
a new schedule periodically as it changes every other year just
like FAI. The schedules (P & Masters) are so close in
difficulty that flying the P schedule should not be any problem
for masters class flyers.<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 14px">OK, Flame suit on!<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT
size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org [<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]</A>
<B>On Behalf Of </B>Mark Atwood<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 31,
2008 3:56 PM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Judgeing by commitee?<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR>For our matrix
version, the A& B masters groups, we effectively ran 2 contests.
The scorer set up a second masters only contest for the B panel
to enter their scores. It worked quite well with only a little
confusion. <BR><BR>It did a great job of picking the top 5 guys
and getting them into the top 8. Im pretty sure you could argue
that 7-12th place might have had some variance...but I think thats
true regardless of the format.<BR><BR>-Mark<BR><BR><BR>On 1/31/08 3:49
PM, "Anthony Romano" <anthonyr105@hotmail.com>
wrote:<BR> <BR><BR><BR> I suspected this would
require super- human objectivity as well as be a logistical nightmare.
However, everyone reall knows the sequence. Really like the matrix
system but not sure how much work that makes for the scorer. Anyone
have any thoughts on how to score that<BR> One idea that
was kicked around in D1 was fly an extra round in Masters to generate
an extra throw away. Each round two masters pilots judge and don't fly
rotating through the entire class. It seems like the time required
would work out the same because the group had two less pilots but
again lot of objectivity ( conscious and unconscious ) required
especially as the contest end grew near.
<BR> <BR>Anthony<BR> </SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=3>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR>Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:14:15
-0500<BR>From: atwoodm@paragon-inc.com<BR>To:
nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org;
nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Judgeing by commitee?<BR><BR>Anthony,<BR><BR>I have to agree
with Jim, but for different reasons. We did this about 4
years back at our district championships with the masters class.
We had 17 pilots in masters, and only one (me) in FAI, and
another 6 or 7 in advanced. So getting any judging at all
would have required heavily using the Intermediate and Sportsman
classes to judge, OR, heavily burdening the few Advanced
guys...and sitting through 17 masters flights is a looooong
sentence.<BR><BR>So we did the peer judging scenario.
Given the options, it worked very well. But it
requires some serious juggling to even try and make it work
well. We ! used p! e e! r judgi ng for 4 of the 6 rounds.
Two flight lines, with a rolling panel of judges. 5
judges on each line, tossed high and low by maneuver leaving 7
pilots not judging at any given time. This allowed the
person before and after each flight some time to prep and
decompress before having to jump in the chair for 5 flights and
then start over on the second line.<BR><BR>Its a VERY VERY VERY
busy process, not to mention that unless you completely randomly
resort the flight line each round, the pilot will be judged but
the same group...or maybe more importantly NOT judged by the
same group each round.<BR><BR>It worked...but it was messy.
I would only do it again if we were presented with the
same grossly offset numbers of entries. <BR><BR>On a
related note... A better solution was tried a few years later
when we had similar numbers (16 masters pilots)<BR><BR>We
created 2 classes of masters...A and B. we still
used FAI and Advanced j! u! dges,! but we were also able to
sprinkle in B judges for A and vice versa. We did 4 rounds
for each group. Took the top 4 from each group and
combined them and they flew the last 2 rounds as a Finalists
group (with the other 8 judging and flying in their own group
for the bottom 8 spots.)<BR><BR> This was MUCH more
workable, and I think netted a fairer event in the long
run.<BR><BR>-Mark<BR><BR> <BR><BR><BR>On 1/31/08 2:46
PM, "Woodward, Jim" <jim.woodward@baesystems.com>
wrote:<BR> <BR><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Hey Anthony,<BR> <BR>**** Attempting a 50
words or less approach without too much regard for political
correctness *****<BR> <BR>I dont think peer judging works.
I dont think it sends the right message about problem solving or
achieving a more accurate score per maneuver for each pilot.
Psychology 101 would predict that it does not foster
the right mindset or circumstances for a competitive environment
(Reality TV shows like Survivor are based on one form or another
of peer judging). <BR> <BR>The #1 component that must
be correct for it to work is that all pilot/judges see and
subtract about the exact same number of points per maneuver see
the same downgrades. The situation doesnt compute if one
judge is off from the others or uses impression judging. A
bunch of stuff should probably be in place for this to! work l
ike: ! ! large n umber of judges, drop high score, drop
low score, etc. The highest caliber of honor, integrity, and
judge-education is required by all competitors to make this
work. <BR> <BR>I witnessed this as a Masters pilot
watching the FAI contest. I watched the flying and this
scenario VERY close. My opinion is that I would chose not to
compete in FAI in a peer judging scenario.
<BR> <BR>Thanks,<BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR></SPAN><FONT color=#000080><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Jim W.<BR> <BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <BR>CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE:</SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"> This
e-mail message, includ! ing any attachments, is for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
propr! iet! ar y inf ormation. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us [<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us]">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us]</A>
<A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us]"><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us%5D></A>
<B>On Behalf Of </B>Anthony Romano<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday,
January 31, 2008 1:44 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us<BR><B>Subject:</B>
[NSRCA-discussion] Judgeing by commitee?<BR><BR>Finally got a
chance to read the current K-factor and saw a note on the
Tangerine contest. The article mentioned FAI was judged by a
commity of the FAI pilots. Could someone please provide details.
Do you think you could keep your objectivity? ! For tho se that
were there how did it work out? Sound interesting because you
would finally be judged by pilots wh! o know the FAI rules and
the sequence.<BR> Could this be a solution for the overs!
ized Ma sters class? Obvious drawbacks too, but trying to
inspire some
thought.<BR> <BR>Anthony<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR>Helping your favorite cause is as easy as
instant messaging. You IM, we give. Learn more. <A
href="http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join"><http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="95%" SIZE=3>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9px">_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=3>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR>Helping your favorite cause is as easy
as instant messaging. You IM, we give. Learn more. <A
href="http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join"><http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join></A>
<BR> </SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="95%" SIZE=3>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=1><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9px">_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR></SPAN><FONT size=4><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The
Biggest Loser! Learn more. <A
href="http://biggestloser.msn.com/"><http://biggestloser.msn.com/></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"></SPAN></FONT>
<P align=center><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>Need to know the score, the latest
news, or you need your Hotmail®-get your "fix". Check it out. <A
href="http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx"><http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx></A>
<BR><BR><BR>-----Inline Attachment
Follows-----<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR><BR><BR> <BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=1>
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. <A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs"><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs></A>
<BR></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR><BR> <BR>
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=3>
<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR>
<HR align=center width="95%" SIZE=3>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT size=2><FONT face="Monaco, Courier New"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10px">_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
size=2><FONT face="Monaco, Courier New"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10px"><BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV id=hotbar_promo><BR><A
href="http://promos.hotbar.com/promos/promodll.dll?RunPromo&El=&SG=&RAND=95657&partner=seekmo"><IMG
title="" alt="Upgrade Your Email - Click here!"
src="http://promos.hotbar.com/promos/promodll.dll?GetPromo&El=&SG=&RAND=95657&partner=seekmo&/p.gif"
border=0></A> </DIV>
<P></P></BODY></HTML>