<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<title>Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging by committee?</title>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="PostalCode"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="State"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="City"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="place"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="Street"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="address"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="PersonName"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>That’s why TBL is used at
international events…<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Tony Stillman, President</span></font><font
color=navy><span style='color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Radio South, Inc.</span></font><font
color=navy><span style='color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>139 Altama Connector, <st1:address w:st="on"><st1:Street
w:st="on">Box</st1:Street> 322</st1:address></span></font><font color=navy><span
style='color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on"><font size=2
color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:navy'>Brunswick</span></font></st1:City><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>, <st1:State
w:st="on">GA</st1:State> <st1:PostalCode w:st="on">31525</st1:PostalCode></span></font></st1:place><font
color=navy><span style='color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>1-800-962-7802</span></font><font
color=navy><span style='color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>www.radiosouthrc.com</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] <b><span style='font-weight:
bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Mark Atwood<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Friday, February 01, 2008
1:04 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> <st1:PersonName w:st="on">NSRCA
Mailing List</st1:PersonName><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Judging by committee?</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=1 face=Verdana><span
style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'>I have to strongly agree with <st1:State
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Del</st1:place></st1:State> on this one.
Dropping scores in this manner just isn’t statistically valuable.
You almost always just throw out an entire judge. <br>
<br>
I think those that favor this approach do so because of the stray
“0” that they’ve received sometime in their pattern career,
and see dropping highs (no one REALLY wants to throw out their high scores) and
lows as a way to get rid of the Zero awarded by the local Snap Nazi.
It’s just the wrong approach.<br>
<br>
Maybe with 30 judges it would have some relevance, but not with 5 or even 10.
AND...more often than not, I’ve been MUCH more annoyed at the judge
who MISSED a zero, than one that maybe awarded one unjustifiably. <br>
<br>
I’d rather go the route of having a “Zero” judge, who’s
sole job is to determine that the correct maneuver was flown and that a Snap
was a snap and a spin a spin. The other judges simply judge what was
flown... If a maneuver was missed or out of sequence, the zero
judge overrides those scores. Ok...there’s issues with that
too (missing a point on a point roll for example would be an issue)...just
thinking as I type.<br>
<br>
Anyhow...dropping highs and lows isn’t the solution. (IMHO)<br>
<br>
-Mark <br>
<br>
<br>
On 2/1/08 11:40 AM, "Del Rykert" <drykert2@rochester.rr.com>
wrote:</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
9.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>I have always felt that throwing away a
high and a low score not only insults the judges but encourages judges to
be number generators in the middle of the road as they question giving a zero
when they feel it was earned but knowing it will be tossed if others didn't see
the error. <br>
<br>
To punish a judge that does a better job is always going to be the wrong
approach. I have repeatedly seen where the judge giving the lower score as
being the problem. I can't ever recall personally seeing Santa clausing while
at a contest. If judging is a bad as some seem to think they why not have
judges certified yearly for all contests. At least then you will be using
people that have proven they knew the rules when they took their certification.
<br>
<br>
<st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Del</st1:place></st1:State><br>
</span></font><font size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Verdana'><br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>----- Original Message ----- <br>
From: <</span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>seefo@san.rr.com</span></font><font size=1 face=Verdana><span
style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a href="mailto:seefo@san.rr.com"><mailto:seefo@san.rr.com></a>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>><br>
To: "<st1:PersonName w:st="on">NSRCA Mailing List</st1:PersonName>"
<</span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></font><font size=1
face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></a>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>><br>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:01 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging by committee?<br>
</span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:
Arial'><br>
<font color=blue><span style='color:blue'>> For as long as I've been
competing there has always been the problem of judging being uninformed,
inaccurate, etc. Not pointing fingers, it just is what it is whenever you have
volunteer judging.<br>
> <br>
> Personally I think the efforts made by Jason and the Tangerine people
should be applauded, REGARDLESS of whether or not the outcome is deemed valid.
The fact is they tried something new to solve a problem. If it works, cool. If
not, that's ok too. It just eliminates another incorrect choice at solving the
problem. This sort of outside-the-box thinking should be encouraged. <br>
> <br>
> Having sat through MANY competitions where every one of my peers sees
errors that few, if any judges on the line catch (a certain TOC pilot's wrong
direction snap that only Peter Wessels caught comes to mind), I think the idea
of peer judging has a great deal of merit, even if only as a case study
comparison to standard judging methods. Who better to know what to look for in
a flight than the people flying it? So long as there is a certain amount of
normalization (such as dropping high & low scores) to reduce bias, I
honestly can't think of a reason not to try it. <br>
> <br>
> To a person, I trust everyone I know at this level of competition to judge
accurately and fairly, regardless of them being my competitor or not.<br>
> <br>
> -Doug Cronkhite<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ---- Ken Thompson <</span></font>kthompson@stx.rr.com</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:kthompson@stx.rr.com"><mailto:kthompson@stx.rr.com></a> </span></font><font
size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:blue'>> wrote: <br>
>> I'm sorry Jason, <br>
>> <br>
>> But my comments have little to do with my respect for you, which I
obviously have, it's more that I have a much different opinion with respect
with the comments by Cameron Smith.<br>
>> Cameron...your reputation precedes you...if you would like to take
this off line, I'd be happy to do so. You are opinionated, that's no
problem, I am also, but to call someone out in our forum, that's not right...So
to quote you...I'm here to say things honestly!!!<br>
>> Let's both say what's on our mind...to quote you..."nice to see
someone with a set" I have mine, how 'bout you?<br>
>> <br>
>> Ken Thompson<br>
>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>
>> From: JShulman <br>
>> To: <st1:PersonName w:st="on">NSRCA Mailing List</st1:PersonName>
<br>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 7:12 PM<br>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging by committee?<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Hey guys, I don't mind Cameron's comments. I haven't
exactly had much sleep today, or I should say this morning, so I might have
come off a bit different than usual. I accept his opinion as being his, and
welcome his comments on how to help to improve judging. Not just for FAI, but
for all of pattern.<br>
>> <br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Jason<br>
>> </span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span
style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>www.jasonshulman.com</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="http://www.jasonshulman.com"><http://www.jasonshulman.com></a> <br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>>> </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>www.shulmanaviation.com</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="http://www.shulmanaviation.com"><http://www.shulmanaviation.com></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>>> </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>www.composite-arf.com</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="http://www.composite-arf.com"><http://www.composite-arf.com></a> </span></font><font
size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:blue'><br>
>> <br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: </span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span
style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org></a>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>[<a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org%5dOn">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On</a>
Behalf Of Ken Thompson<br>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:06 PM<br>
>> To: <st1:PersonName w:st="on">NSRCA Mailing
List</st1:PersonName><br>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judgeing by
commitee?<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> This has got to me a freakin' joke...I haven't
been posting much, but things like this will make me come back to life!!!<br>
>> <br>
>> I don't believe the majority would want me to
get back on the band wagon with my opinions...this kind of post is pushing me
in that direction...<br>
>> <br>
>> Ken Thompson<br>
>> NSRCA 3646<br>
>> AMA 685343<br>
>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>
>> From: C. Smith <br>
>> To: '<st1:PersonName w:st="on">NSRCA
Mailing List</st1:PersonName>' <br>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008
6:48 PM<br>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Judgeing by commitee?<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Jim,<br>
>> <br>
>> I just got home, Sat down to
eat my dinner & read the emails... <br>
>> <br>
>> When you read this to me
this afternoon it did not make the impression it did when I read it.....<br>
>> <br>
>> I am not trying to
blow smoke up your skirt please believe me...<br>
>> <br>
>> It is refreshing to see
someone say things honestly & in such a way.... Too few say what needs to
be said.....<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Jason's response came
across as self serving damage control.. I do not think he comes across as
a sincere person. As a matter of fact he seems very insecure......<br>
>> <br>
>> He came back at you by
saying 3 of the 4 believe it WILL work.. But I could have sworn you showed me
emails from Ryan disagreeing with the practice..... I would bet you Joe &
Ryan in public would agree with Jason just to associate them selves with him..
I call this by many names....Weak, Intellectually Dishonest & self
serving.. <br>
>> <br>
>> Oh well I just want you to
know Good job-- Nice to see someone with a set.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> From: </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org></a>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>[<a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org%5d">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]</a>
On Behalf Of Woodward, Jim<br>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008
2:47 PM<br>
>> To: <st1:PersonName w:st="on">NSRCA
Mailing List</st1:PersonName><br>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Judgeing by commitee?<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Hey Anthony,<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> **** Attempting a 50 words or less
approach without too much regard for political correctness *****<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> I don't think peer judging works.
I don't think it sends the right message about problem solving or
achieving a more accurate score per maneuver for each pilot.
Psychology 101 would predict that it does not foster the right
mindset or circumstances for a competitive environment (Reality TV shows like
Survivor are based on one form or another of peer judging). <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> The #1 component that must be
correct for it to work is that all pilot/judges see and subtract about the
exact same number of points per maneuver see the same downgrades. The
situation doesn't compute if one judge is off from the others or uses
impression judging. A bunch of stuff should probably be in place for this
to work like: large number of judges, drop high score, drop low score,
etc. The highest caliber of honor, integrity, and judge-education is
required by all competitors to make this work. <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> I witnessed this as a Masters
pilot watching the FAI contest. I watched the flying and this scenario
VERY close. My opinion is that I would chose not to compete in FAI in a peer
judging scenario. <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Thanks,<br>
>> <br>
>> Jim W.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This
e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and proprietary information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> <br>
>> From: </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us"><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us></a>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>[<a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us%5d">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.f3a.us]</a>
On Behalf Of Anthony Romano<br>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008
1:44 PM<br>
>> To: </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.f3a.us></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>>>
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Judgeing by
commitee?<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Finally got a chance to read the
current K-factor and saw a note on the Tangerine contest. The article mentioned
FAI was judged by a commity of the FAI pilots. Could someone please provide
details. Do you think you could keep your objectivity? For those that were
there how did it work out? Sound interesting because you would finally be
judged by pilots who know the FAI rules and the sequence.<br>
>> Could this be a solution for
the oversized Masters class? Obvious drawbacks too, but trying to inspire some
thought.<br>
>> <br>
>> Anthony<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> <br>
>> Helping your favorite cause is as
easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give. Learn more.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>> </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>>> </span></font><font
size=1 face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'><a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>>> <br>
>> <br>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>> </span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span
style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>>> </span></font><font size=1
face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'><a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
> </span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</span></font><font size=1
face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></a>
<br>
</span></font><font size=1 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;color:blue'>> </span></font><font size=1 face=Arial><span
style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Arial'><a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><font
size=1 face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'> <a
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion></a>
<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=1
face=Verdana><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Verdana'>
<hr size=3 width="95%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=1 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:7.5pt;
font-family:"Courier New"'>_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>