<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; ">I agree, BUT the NSRCA judge evaluation committee must have the scores to evaluate and we STILL don't have the 2006 Nats scores. <DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Ron</DIV><DIV><BR><DIV><DIV>On Oct 18, 2007, at 9:18 PM, Earl Haury wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"> <DIV><FONT face="Arial">We miss an opportunity for judges to evaluate their performance by not distributing the results of the analysis of that performance (at major meets). I, for one, would like the judges performance data to be published in the K-Factor (after all - the pilots scores are published). However, realizing that some are squeamish about this, I think that we should still provide each judge with the analysis of his / her specific performance. At least, each judge would then have an indication of their current skills and any variation over the years.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Arial">Earl</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>