<DIV>Mark I was just going to say that nobody had mentioned the sun yet with the offset it would put the sun in play both in morning and evening, according to field orientation.</DIV> <DIV> Steve Maxwell<BR><BR><B><I>Mark Atwood <atwoodm@paragon-inc.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px">I doubt there are many flying sites that could accommodate that, and it by necessity puts the sun in one of the two boxes...<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>On 9/28/07 2:13 PM, "Bob Richards" <bob@toprudder.com> wrote:<BR><BR></SPAN></FONT> <BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px">In looking at it, why not offset each line 30'. Total of 60' offset between the two lines. This would put the box boundary on one side of each line at the flight line. Would make the "diamond of death" much
smaller in area.<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>Bob R.<BR> <BR><BR><BR><B><I>Mark Atwood <atwoodm@paragon-inc.com></I></B> wrote:<BR> <BR></SPAN></FONT> <BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px">AWESOME...That's EXACTLY what I was looking for. I'm pleasantly<BR>surprised...it does significantly reduce the overlapping footprint.<BR><BR>Another "benefit" of this offset is that there will be FAR fewer incidents<BR>where the planes will APPEAR to be in danger. Because of that, we might be<BR>able to react more aggressively regarding avoidence, since there will be a<BR>LOT fewer disruptions with reduced close calls. I.e. It won't feel like the<BR>boy that cried wolf so often.<BR><BR>Also, with airplanes coming together from two distinct angles, the pilot and<BR>callers ability to see a collision course is MUCH higher as the perspective<BR>will allow a more accurate evaluation of
depth.<BR><BR>Interesting...I like it.<BR><BR>-M<BR><BR><BR></SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><BR> <HR align=center width="95%" SIZE=3> </SPAN></FONT><FONT size=2><FONT face="Monaco, Courier New"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10px">_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT size=2><FONT face="Monaco, Courier New"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10px"><BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> 
<hr size=1>Luggage? GPS? Comic books? <br>
Check out fitting <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48249/*http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz"> gifts for grads</a> at Yahoo! Search.