<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Masters Sequence for 2009/2010</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16481" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>John,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>there seems to be a tone to the current political climate.
NSRCA management determined they know better than the membership who voted for
something. And then there is the other issues regarding the NSRCA's high road,
holy above all sanctioning activities.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Obviously history is written by the winners. Its too bad that
NSRCA just decides what it wants to do and does it. I thought it used to be a
democratic society. A vote of the membership meant this was direction the Board
should take. Apparently when you don't like the vote you just take another one.
After all this is what the dems tried to do in Florida.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Wasn't the idea of filling out a survey with 2007 and 2009
masters sequences on it the idea to jump ahead of the cycle and get it done way
before hand. Yet it seems the NSRCA management has undermined the work of a few
in order to write history in favor of another few who complain loudly enough.
Funny how the majority of people writing the new sequence are all from the same
area of the country. This is fair and balanced.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I think you are right John. Pattern in the NSRCA has reached
critical mass why would anyone want to come play with us. Having known
people involved and in this case Troy, I doubt seriously he stopped working on
this do to not having 100% of his time available for the re-write. I bet the
real story will come out someday. Some people have morals and ethics and others
well they write the history books.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Apparently the work done last time once praised as good is now
old news and the powers that be need to make a new legacy for
themselves.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Wayne</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=johnferrell@earthlink.net
href="mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net">John Ferrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 26, 2007 3:15
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed
Masters Sequence for 2009/2010</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I (and others I think) got pretty bored with
practicing the same old stuff. While I took a break I developed enough minor
health problems to keep me side lined indefinitely. Others found other things
to do. D2 attendance is now below critical mass. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If the choice is to hurry to Masters or quit
playing then I suppose I need to just do the best I can with Masters and let
it go at that!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It really doesn't matter, the rules are made by
individuals who have the political clout not the governing committees. Whoever
controls the agenda has veto power and anonymity. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>John Ferrell W8CCW<BR>"Life is easier if you learn to
plow <BR> around the stumps"<BR><A
href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=atwoodm@paragon-inc.com href="mailto:atwoodm@paragon-inc.com">Mark
Atwood</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:45
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Proposed Masters Sequence for 2009/2010</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px">Hear hear.<BR><BR>I’m not generally a proponent of
changing the lower classes all the time (the intent is that they not be
destination classes...I also know the reality of that so please, no hate
mail) But I’m a HUGE HUGE HUGE fan of being ABLE to change them every
year...i.e. Removing the patterns from the AMA rulebook and allowing the Sig
to post the schedules that will be in effect in a given year.<BR><BR>I think
you’ll find ALL of the contest board members would vote “Yea” for that if
they ever got the chance to...<BR><BR>The advantages are so many I can’t
even begin to list them.<BR><BR>-M<BR><BR><BR>On 7/26/07 8:37 AM, "John
Ferrell" <johnferrell@earthlink.net> wrote:<BR><BR></SPAN></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT face=Arial>Are you certain
that you really can change the schedule without waiting out the rules
cycle?<BR></FONT><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR></FONT><FONT
face=Arial>The lower classes had to endure 6 years of the same schedule
because the Contest Board refused to act on anything other than emergency
proposals in the interim. Many of the Advanced flyers elected just to
stand down. <BR></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR></FONT><FONT face=Arial>You have just
pointed to advantage the IMAC discipline has over Pattern with
AMA...<BR></FONT><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR></FONT><FONT
face=Arial>I hope you can pull it off because the existing conditions are
detrimental to the game.<BR></FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>John Ferrell
W8CCW<BR>"Life is easier if you learn to plow
<BR> around the stumps"<BR><A
href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></FONT></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>----- Original Message -----
<BR> <BR><B>From:</B> Derek Koopowitz <A
href="mailto:derekkoopowitz@gmail.com"><mailto:derekkoopowitz@gmail.com></A>
<BR> <BR><B>To:</B> 'NSRCA Mailing List' <A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></A>
<BR> <BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:26
PM<BR> <BR><B>Subject:</B> [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed
Masters Sequence for
2009/2010<BR> <BR><BR> <BR><BR></FONT><FONT face=Arial>Over
the past couple of months we (the NSRCA board) have received a
number of comments about the Masters sequence that was selected in
2005. We heard that the sequence had too many snaps,
turnaround maneuvers did not allow positioning of the plane (in or
out) after the 5th maneuver, and that the difficulty level from
Advanced to Masters was further increased. There was also an
error in the schedule in that one would come out of the Double
Immelman (#10) inverted and head into the Humpty Bump
(pull-push-pull) and head into the ground based on the description.
The Masters schedule was published in the July 2005 issue of
the K-Factor (Option A on page 25) - in </FONT><FONT
face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR></FONT></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px"><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
<HR align=center width="95%" SIZE=3>
</FONT></SPAN><FONT size=2><FONT face="Monaco, Courier New"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10px">_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A><BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT
size=2><FONT face="Monaco, Courier New"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10px"><BR></SPAN></FONT></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>