<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16481" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I would give a 0 to a 2-point roll as a SEPARATE maneuver for
a missed point. a full roll is not a 2-point. Totally wrong
maneuver</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If the 2-point roll was an element of a single maneuver such
as (not even caring if its in a sequence) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>a stall turn 2 of 2 up 2 of 4 down, enter upright, exit
inverted.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>That would get 5 points for missing the point of the 2 of
2. Basicly the right maneuver with a blown element.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=seefo@san.rr.com href="mailto:seefo@san.rr.com">Doug Cronkhite</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, July 01, 2007 9:21 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Chapter-5
Going too far now "missed point".</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>RCA-20 and FAI 5B.4.4.3 both say 5 <B>or more</B> points as a
downgrade for missing a point. How do you judge anything with such a vague
criteria? "Or more?" Using this method, if the rest of the maneuver was flown
perfectly, both a 5 and a 0 would be correct!<BR><BR>-Doug<BR><BR><BR><BR>Dave
Reaville wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=midd11c8a06570.4687f97b@shaw.ca type="cite">
<DIV>Interesting... I just happen to be doing the judging exam and this
is one of the questions they ask to see if you know how to apply the
downgrades correctly :-)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In the example given, the pilot missed a point so it's a 5 (or more)
point downgrade as per the AMA rule book (RCA-20) and also the FAI
rule book (pg 28 5B.4.3.3). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If your suggesting it's a zero because the manouver is flown
"incorrectly" then why do they have this 5 point downgrade at all? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Let's go a little further... If I was judging you at the Nats (I
just might be BTW) and gave you a zero for a missed point would you
actually accept that as being a correct score? I wouldn't... so
you guys are going to just have to get used to the 5 (or
more) downgrade from me..... unless of course you don't miss the
"point" to begin with.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dave </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition. <BR>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/883 - Release Date:
7/1/2007 12:19 PM<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>