<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=us-ascii>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3086" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>The rule for missing points, as I see it, is for multiple points like a 4
point roll, an 8 pt roll, 6 points of a 6 sided loop, etc. When you do a half
roll instead of a point....IT IS THE WRONG MANEUVER!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:59:07 -0700 Dave Reaville <<A
href="mailto:dkrev@shaw.ca">dkrev@shaw.ca</A>> writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV>Interesting... I just happen to be doing the judging exam and this
is one of the questions they ask to see if you know how to apply the
downgrades correctly :-)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In the example given, the pilot missed a point so it's a 5 (or more)
point downgrade as per the AMA rule book (RCA-20) and also the FAI rule
book (pg 28 5B.4.3.3). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If your suggesting it's a zero because the manouver is flown
"incorrectly" then why do they have this 5 point downgrade at all? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Let's go a little further... If I was judging you at the Nats (I
just might be BTW) and gave you a zero for a missed point would you
actually accept that as being a correct score? I wouldn't... so you
guys are going to just have to get used to the 5 (or
more) downgrade from me..... unless of course you don't miss the
"point" to begin with.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dave </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> ----- Original Message -----<BR>From: Doug Cronkhite
<seefo@san.rr.com><BR>Date: Sunday, July 1, 2007 4:11 pm<BR>Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Chapter-5 Going too far.<BR>To: NSRCA Mailing List
<nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR><BR>> To me that's a completely
different maneuver and would score a zero.<BR>> <BR>> -Doug<BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<BR>> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>