<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>That sounds entirely too simple Keith. I totally
agree. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I still feel anyone that travels 500-1000-1500
miles can afford a higher entry fee. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>At the same time I dont feel the NSRCA should have
to take up the slack for some of the smaller SIG's. This year will be my first
NATs and if the fees increase $20-40 who cares, thats only a drop in the bucket.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'm somewhat biased because my local club of old
timers never wants to charge for Fun-flys due to fuel prices. Our club isn't
weathy and we have expenses. My typical arguement everytime is "I dont know of
any free funfly events with prizes and lunch in TX, and if you can't afford
$10-15 landing fee you need a new hobby".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dylan </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>