<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"
bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 name="Compose message area"
acc_role="text" CanvasTabStop="true">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>What I did to help train my pilots and judging eye was to
walk to end of flight box, staying on judging side of flight line at contest,
and watched 4 or 5 skilled pilots flying their center maneuvers. It produced the
same visual effect on their center maneuvers as standing at center of
box and looking at end maneuvers. (Realize this only applies to the center
maneuvers for eyeball training) the assumption is the center maneuvers are flown
normally more accurately than end box maneuvers. The added bonus was I
could see if the pilots where doing correct true verticals and horizontals at my
end of the maneuvering box. The surprising flaw I noticed was some
would not fly their bottom horizontals flat. Some would also not pull a
true vertical. Occasionally I would see a pilot off as much as 20º from
true vertical. They would often have a slight climb in them as they approached
the end of the box. I found going out and experiencing was my best
teacher. Class rooms talks are great but they can't reproduce all of the
geometry that an experienced judge gains from sitting the flight line
year after year. When contests had more man power to run a contest it was
discussed about having turnaround judges at one time.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial> Del</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ed_alt@hotmail.com href="mailto:ed_alt@hotmail.com">Ed Alt</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:04
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] APPARENT
GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>And all the lines will bend and not appear straight, Hey, I do that
already!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ed</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mailto:fhhuber@clearwire.net
href="mailto:fhhuber@clearwire.net">Fred Huber</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, April 09, 2007 10:59
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
APPARENT GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The responsibility of the pilot s to PERFORM the corret
geometry despite the parallax view.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The responsibility of the judge is to learn how the
parallax will make the correctly flown maneuver look.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>About the only way I can think of to show the effects of
parallax on a correctly flown turnaround maneuver would be to film it from
as close to perpendicular to the flight path as possible, and at the judges'
location at the same time. then play the tapes sumultaneously at a judging
seminar.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>At the appx 45 to 55 deg observation angle of the judges
station, a 45 deg up/down line (half cuban) would appear steeper than what
is actually being performed. If it looks like a 45 from the judge's
station (holding up a 9th gradeer's geometry class triangle), its too
shallow. The appearance of 60 deg (same method) would be closer to
actually being the 45 deg line.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Note that if the pilot doesn't make use of the full box,
the parallax will be reduced... and that's not downgradeable.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Verticals should still look vertical.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mailto:rcmaster199@aol.com
href="mailto:rcmaster199@aol.com">rcmaster199@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, April 09, 2007 10:11
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [NSRCA-discussion] APPARENT
GEOMETRY (PARALLAXED VIEW)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>A question has been posted from an IMAC gentleman (who is trying
to write better IMAC rules) as to how Pattern people fly and judge
skewed appearance of maneuvers at box ends or in center when tall
maneuvers (Hourglass, Vert Sq 8, Rolling Ess, etc) are involved. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Some of us have searched the book and found no wording written that
describes what the pilots' responsibilities and the judges'
responsibilities are in the performance of the skewed apparent geometry.
There is a statement in the Judges Training tape in regard to end
maneuvers.... that these will appear different even when accurately flown.
The oness is essentially on the judges to know how the True Geometry
should appear when flown at an angle to the eye, and must not downgrade
for Apparent or Parallaxed appearance difference.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Spoke with Don about this earlier today and we decided to present the
question to the group and get some conversation going. We should be
explicit in the book regarding how such Apparent Geometry should be
treated....ie- what is the pilot's responsibility and what is the judge's.
Description improvements could be written over the next couple rule
cycles.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The pilot's responsibility may appear easy.... they simply need to
fly precise geometry per the book. True enough, BUT.....consider what is
actually flown, especially by the top guys, and what scores well. These
are not necessarily as precise as one might think. The better pilots tend
to fly purposely flawed maneuvers that give the impression of
precision. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>MattK</DIV>
<DIV class=AOLPromoFooter>
<HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at <A title=http://www.aol.com/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437
href="http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437"
target=_blank><B>AOL.com</B></A>.<BR></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition.<BR>Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/752 - Release
Date: 4/8/2007 8:34 PM<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>