<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Hey Terry,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm not switching back, but I also won't rule it out. I am very happy with
my electrics at the moment. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Emory.</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=amad2terry@juno.com href="mailto:amad2terry@juno.com">Adrien L
Terrenoire</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:57
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Back to
glow???!!!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Just recently I was having a discussion with several top pattern fliers
adn the sentiment seemed to be that we will be heading BACK to nitro power,
and away from the current, pun intended, trend.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Any thoughts out there?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry T</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:18:55 -0500 "Emory Schroeter" <<A
href="mailto:emorydmd@earthlink.net">emorydmd@earthlink.net</A>>
writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV>Jon,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Don't let it get under your skin. Someone will always find fault with
what you do when it is done publicly. BTW, I saved a copy of your
article just in case I decide to switch back to glow :-) Although, I'm not
ready to switch back yet. Thanks for taking the time to do it. It is
important that folks like yourself contribute to the KF. It is the only way
it will continue to be a fantastic publication.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks, Emory.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=JonLowe@aol.com href="mailto:JonLowe@aol.com">JonLowe@aol.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, January 14, 2007 2:15
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] List
rules... ??</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Amen. I'm getting tired of the "political correctness" both on
the list and the K Factor. I'm taking it a little personal at this
point, because Lamar Blair told me that he got a letter (not
email) the other day blasting the article I wrote on the OS 1.60 in
the Nov 2006 K Factor. Why? Because I dared to mention Tower
Hobbies and other sources as suggested places you could get the pieces I
described. I have not seen the letter, as Lamar sent it on to
Derek K., but Lamar described the contents. The writer is a
member of NSRCA and was offended because I mentioned non-advertising
vendors, at the alledged expense of advertising vendors and local hobby
shops. Let's see, Great Planes is a regular full page advertiser in
the K Factor as the importer for Futaba and OS. Hmm, who owns
Great Planes? Hobbico. Who owns Tower? Hobbico.
Seems like Hobbico supports the K Factor to me. So much for that
crime.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Other vendors I mentioned were Aeroslave, Andy Pollitt for nose
rings, Home Depot, Karl Mueller for headers, Boca Bearings, Dave Lockhart
for repitched props, Bob Pasterello for coupler material, Morgan fuel, and
a couple of others in passing. Why did I mention them? Because
that would have been the first email I got, asking, "where do you buy this
stuff?". Some of these guys are so small that advertising a lot
doesn't make sense for them. Very few, if any, of the specialized
parts may be available at your particular local hobby shop (LHS), and
some vendors don't sell thru LHS. I support my LHS, but giving
sources lets people look at what they are buying, even if they get it thru
the LHS. I also support K Factor vendors, as my bills from Central
and Budd prove. And sometimes I just don't feel like driving 20
minutes to my LHS for something they don't stock and would special
order, that I can order online and have delivered to my door in
a couple of days.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Frankly, I think Ihncheol did the right thing. He let people know of
a supply for a scare product in high demand. He could have told his
buddies about it, and have one of them post it, and no one would (or
could)have said a thing. It isn't like he is on here all the time
pushing his products.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The writer of the letter did not have the courtesy to copy me on the
letter. Derek, if you read this, please send me a copy when you get
it. Frankly, if the whole thing wasn't so ridiculous, I'd think
twice about writing another article for the K Factor.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Incidently, I am not sponsored by any of the companies I mentioned in
my article or here. I do write for RC Report on occasion.
Oops, I just mentioned a non-advertisor! Shame on me...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Jon Lowe</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 1/14/2007 11:42:58 AM Central Standard Time,
ronlock@comcast.net writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
face=Arial>We benefit from short focused posts on availability of some
difficult to<BR>find product/part, substitute parts, reference to a part
to solve problems,<BR>answers to questions, etc. Be that from a
sponsored pilot, service company,<BR>cottage supplier, etc.<BR><BR>Do we
need to ask NSRCA leadership for an interpretation or re-write of
the<BR>Policy to establish a "Balance" of OK information as opposed to
abuse of the<BR>list<BR>by advertisers? If this is a problem, then
maybe so. Ive not seen a<BR>problem.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition.<BR>Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/625 - Release
Date: 1/13/2007 5:40 PM<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition.<BR>Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/625 - Release Date:
1/13/2007 5:40 PM<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>