<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>flying slower gives more TIME and helps make the plane
fly smoother (within reason...) Firewalling the throttle and leaving it
there will keep you rushed... especially if you are flying too
close.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><B>From:</B> <A title=tretas513@yahoo.com
href="mailto:tretas513@yahoo.com">Tommy Scarmardo</A> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 08, 2007 3:05
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re:
[NSRCA-discussion]SmallModels...goodforthefutureofthePatternEvent?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Gray,</DIV>
<DIV>You could not be more correct . A number of times I've been
told by a judge I would have</DIV>
<DIV>scored better if I'd have flown slower.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>tommy s<BR><BR><B><I>Gray E Fowler <<A
href="mailto:gfowler@raytheon.com">gfowler@raytheon.com</A>></I></B>
wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR><FONT
size=2><TT>"OK... make noticeable speed variations doing your maneuvers in
your <BR>sequence.... watch your score.<BR><BR>If you vary your speed...
you're gonna get downgrades. Prove it wrong by <BR>varying speed but
doing the maneuver the correct shape and getting a 10. It <BR>will not
happen."</TT></FONT> <BR><BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Fred you
probably are correct, your scores will suffer. Daves point is (and my
installing exclaimations points) that this is not in the rules and any of
you that are judging per this criteria are wrong and are damaging our
beloved hobby. Be fair people and follow the rules, not your bias, as
you will never know what the other judge's bias could possibly be...and I
have heard many idiotic based judging bias. </FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2>By the way I conducted a study, employed IPDS and produced a
matrix that proves that such judging bias is the reason why the number of
pattern flyers has steadily decreased over the last 20 years. If you wanna
increase our numbers eliminate judges who do not follow the rules, it will
be approximately 74.571% more effective than creating a "new rule"
eliminating 2M planes from lower classes.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>Signed, with love</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>Terminal Advanced Guy........until I can get rid of
my kids...<BR><BR>Gray Fowler<BR>Senior Principal Chemical
Engineer<BR>Radome and Composites
Engineering<BR>Raytheon</FONT>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<P>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You
Yahoo!?<BR>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
<BR>http://mail.yahoo.com
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition.<BR>Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/619 - Release Date:
1/7/2007<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>