<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sure the 2-meter pattern ship is in the future of someone who
sticks with Pattern. By the time you are flying advanced you need a low to
mid range 2 meter ship to be comptitive. (the 2 to 3 yr old planes the Master's
and FAI guys sell off because the new "hot ticket" plane is needed at THIER
level)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>More demanding sequence... needs a better pilot and a better
plane.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>That doesn't stop you from recommending flying Sportsman to
someone as a skill builder, using a sport plane. Get them flying the
sequence and trying a couple of contests and you might have a new lifetime
competitor.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If you can't get them to fly the sequence in front of a
judge... then obviously you haven't enticed a newbie to the Sport of Precision
Aerobatics. Some people will go for it... most won't. Some will do
it (like me) just to build skills so they break fewer planes... (and I
doubt I'll ever be a serious Pattern competitor) Some will decide they
like the competition and stick with Pattern... some will decide they like
competition and move to a different aerobatics compstition style (IMAC/IMAA for
example)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ronlock@comcast.net
href="mailto:ronlock@comcast.net">ronlock@comcast.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:46
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Small
Models ... good forthefutureofthePattern Event?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Yep, part of reason for my Tiger II sport planes is to show </DIV>
<DIV>"precision-ish" aerobatics to potential new pattern pilots.</DIV>
<DIV>That may have helped with local recruiting.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>But....The nearby 2 meter tends to contradict the message that
the</DIV>
<DIV>new guys don't need it. It's presence keeps saying
that a 2 meter is </DIV>
<DIV>the logical result of starting down the pattern road.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Later, Ron Lockhart</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>From: "Fred Huber"
<fhhuber@clearwire.net> <BR><BR>> To entice begiiners into pattern,
the question is... "What do I need to <BR>> compete at Sportsman
level"... and for Sportsman, the .60 to .90 size planes <BR>> are just
fine. I've seen a U-Can-Do 3D 60 beat a 2 meter plane... At <BR>>
Sportsman, I'd expect a 60 size "Ultra Stick" to do very well. <BR>>
<BR>> You can explain the difference in aircraft performance requirements
with <BR>> increasing competiton levels, while standing beside that top
end 2-meter <BR>> plane with 3KW of brushless power (or a 1.60
2-stroke... or even the <BR>> turbine) in the nose, and not look like
you're making things up by::: <BR>> breaking out a sport model and taking
it through the Sportsman sequence to <BR>> demonstrate. <BR>> <BR>>
A sport model being contro! lled by a Pattern flyer looks like a different
<BR>> model than the same plane being flown by an average "sunday flyer".
The <BR>> stick skills show, no matter what the pilot is flying. <BR>>
<BR>> Actually.. if the pilot's stick skills need work... a sport model
can look <BR>> smoother than the 2-meter Pattern design. My .90 size
(e-powered) pattern <BR>> design shows me EVERY mistake I make. My sport
models hide a lot. I <BR>> "twitch" the pattern plane responds NOW. The
sport plane seems to "think <BR>> about it" for a bit. <BR>> <BR>>
************** <BR>> <BR>> I still think the Sportsman sequence needs
to be CAREFULLY kept such that a <BR>> .60 size "Ugly stick" or
equivilent with a .60 2-stroke in the nose can do <BR>> all maneuvers
easilly. That vertical up-line in the new sequence pushes the <BR>> edge
of what should be in Sportsman... (the .60 size Ugly Stick needs a .91
<BR>> 4-stroke in the nose with that maneuver in the se! quence. .. The
.61 2-stroke <BR>> runs out of steam on the way up.) <BR>> <BR>>
You want a good Sportsman sequence... have a Sportsman draw it up... not a
<BR>> Masters or FAI competitor. <BR>> <BR>> Sportsman is to get
the beginners to competition used to flying in front of <BR>> judges.
Sportsman used to be called "Novice"..... and that helped keep the <BR>>
purpose of the class visible. Its there to help new competitors learn to
<BR>> handle the stress of flying for score and to build basic skills
needed for <BR>> higher level competition.... Not to test the vertical
performance of the <BR>> aircraft. <BR>> <BR>> Sportsman, in my
opinion could withstand having a permanantly fixed <BR>> sequence. (such
as the one that just got superceeded, because I think the <BR>> new one
demands too much out of the aircraft) When a Sportsman competitor <BR>>
gets bored flying that same sequence every contest... its probably time to
<BR>> move up! . <BR>& gt; <BR>> FHH <BR>> <BR>> -----
Original Message ----- <BR>> From: "Ed Miller"
<EDBON85@CHARTER.NET><BR>> To: "NSRCA Mailing List"
<NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007
2:32 PM <BR>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Small Models ... good for
<BR>> thefutureofthePattern Event? <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >I think
the fact there are a slew of 60 to 90 sized pattern arfs readily <BR>>
> available at a sub $300 price tag will motivate newbies more than the
<BR>> > cumbersome size issue. If or when a newbie gets hooked, the
size issue, <BR>> > or <BR>> > lack there of, then is an added
benefit. Problem is and we've all been <BR>> > there is the question
"what do I need to compete with". There you stand <BR>> > touting all
the good 60 to 90 size planes out there while trying to hide <BR>> >
your guppy 2M plane of the week............ <BR>> > Ed M. <BR>>
> ----- Origina! l Messa ge ----- <BR>> > From: "Dean Pappas"
<D.PAPPAS@KODEOS.COM><BR>> > To: "NSRCA Mailing List"
<NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>> > Sent: Thursday, January 04,
2007 2:21 PM <BR>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Small Models ...
good for the <BR>> > futureofthePattern Event? <BR>> > <BR>>
> <BR>> >> Thanks Jay, <BR>> >> That's why I posted to
the list. Between the whole lot of us, we can get <BR>> >> some
coverage. <BR>> >> Maybe it begs the issue of how to find newbies
in the first place ( silly <BR>> >> grin ) but you might start at
the regular club meeting/field. <BR>> >> Aren't there guys who
watch and comment on your Pattern stuff, but don't <BR>> >> get
into the event, in your local club? <BR>> >> Ask them if they think
the entry barrier would change for them or someone <BR>> >> like
them. They may be closer to that prospective newbie than you ar! e. <BR>>
>> They may come back and say that the practice discipline is why they
will <BR>> >> never do it, <BR>> >> and others may come
back and say, "Wow smaller/cheaper planes that fit in <BR>> >> my
car and my apartmenmt workshop! I'm in!" <BR>> >> I doubt you'll
get such clear feedback, but you might get something. <BR>> >>
later, <BR>> >> Dean <BR>> >> <BR>> >> <BR>>
>> Dean Pappas <BR>> >> Sr. Design Engineer <BR>> >>
Kodeos Communications <BR>> >> 111 Corporate Blvd. <BR>>
>> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 <BR>> >> (908) 222-7817 phone
<BR>> >> (908) 222-2392 fax <BR>> >> d.pappas@kodeos.com
<BR>> >> <BR>> >> <BR>> >> -----Original
Message----- <BR>> >> From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Jay <BR>> !
>> ; Marshall <BR>> >> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:58
PM <BR>> >> To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' <BR>> >> Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Small Models ... good for the future <BR>> >>
ofthePattern Event? <BR>> >> <BR>> >> <BR>> >>
Dean, you bring up a very good point. Most of us are seeped in the 2m
<BR>> >> venue. <BR>> >> We should really be talking to
prospective new flyers. How do we do that? <BR>> >> <BR>>
>> -----Original Message----- <BR>> >> From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dean <BR>>
>> Pappas <BR>> >> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:09 PM
<BR>> >> To: NSRCA Mailing List <BR>> >> Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Small Models ... good for the future of <BR>> >>
thePattern Event? <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Hi Anthon! y, <BR>>
>> Hi All, <BR>> >> Forget the implementational details for
now. Stop trying to Engineer it, <BR>> >> we <BR>> >> are
doing Marketting. <BR>> >> If it helps to get in the right frame of
mind, take a few stiff drinks <BR>> >> and <BR>> >> bang
your head on the workbench about ten times. <BR>> >> If we decide
that it's worthwhile, then there are a zillion ways to make <BR>>
>> the <BR>> >> transition and to also grandfather existing
planes for several years. <BR>> >> That's not the issue, at least
not for now. <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Changing the shape of the
event: just for "something to do" would be an <BR>> >> awful waste
of energy and needless turmoil. <BR>> >> We all dislike wasted
energy, and I hope that we all agree that needless <BR>> >> turmoil
is to be avoided. <BR>> >> I really want to focus on the basic
question. Will ! making Pattern ships <BR>> >> smaller lead to
increased future participation in the event? <BR>> >> If the answer
isn't YES, then the grief probably ain't worth it. <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> So far, I am hearing a mixed bag, and a whole lot of talk
about the <BR>> >> compromises we have all made when buying a
vehicle. <BR>> >> I am there with you. (stow 'n go Grand caravan
... love it) <BR>> >> But the choir is already saved, and you all
already fly Pattern. <BR>> >> Please go pester the newbies and the
folks that you think are potential <BR>> >> Pattern newbies.
<BR>> >> Will this make a difference as to whether they take the
plunge? <BR>> >> Maybe the answer is that future participation
won't be improved. <BR>> >> <BR>> >> After we figure out
whether future participation will or will not be <BR>> >> helped,
<BR>> >> then we can figure out what those of us! alread y in the
event would like. <BR>> >> That is an entirely separate question.
<BR>> >> <BR>> >> thanks for the help, <BR>> >>
Dean <BR>> >> <BR>> >> <BR>> >> <BR>> >>
Dean Pappas <BR>> >> Sr. Design Engineer <BR>> >> Kodeos
Communications <BR>> >> 111 Corporate Blvd. <BR>> >> South
Plainfield, N.J. 07080 <BR>> >> (908) 222-7817 phone <BR>>
>> (908) 222-2392 fax <BR>> >> d.pappas@kodeos.com <BR>>
>> <BR>> >> <BR>> >> -----Original Message-----
<BR>> >> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <BR>>
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
Anthony <BR>> >> Romano <BR>> >> Sent: Thursday, January
04, 2007 11:31 AM <BR>> >> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
<BR>> >> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Small Models bonus!? <BR>>
>> <BR>&! gt; > ;> <BR>> >> Ok I will try it again.
What about a 10 % score bonus for a 1.7m model? <BR>> >> 1.5m
<BR>> >> <BR>> >> 20%? Encourage the newbie or the guy on
a budget and take away the <BR>> >> perceived <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> advantage without causing obsolescence on current
equipment. <BR>> >> Remember the biplane bonus at the TOC? Wasn't
there a size bonus as well <BR>> >> waaayyy back? <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> Maybe it needs to be limited to sportsman or intermediate
maybe not. <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Anthony <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> <BR>> >>>From: "Ed Miller"
<EDBON85@CHARTER.NET><BR>> >>>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List
<NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>> >>>To: "NSRCA Mailing
List" <NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>> >>>Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models <BR>> >>>Date: Thu, 4 Jan
2007! 08:12: 11 -0500 <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>>Yes, that
is known as the BPA, Ballistic Pattern Association. So soon <BR>>
>>>there <BR>> >>>will be 3 pattern venues to split the
already dwindling pattern base :). <BR>> >>>Ed M. <BR>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- <BR>> >>>From: "Earl
Haury" <EHAURY@HOUSTON.RR.COM><BR>> >>>To: "NSRCA Mailing List"
<NSRCA-DISCUSSION@LISTS.NSRCA.ORG><BR>> >>>Sent: Thursday,
January 04, 2007 6:40 AM <BR>> >>>Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>>Interesting indeed - a local club is
considering holding a "ole fashion" <BR>> >>>pattern contest
this fall. The plan is to fly pre-turnaround pattern. Not <BR>>
>>>sure exactly what the rules will be - but not SPA, as the intent
is to <BR>> >>>allow <BR>> >>>'70's - '80's
airplanes! with p iped engines & retracts (one member <BR>>
>>>mentioned <BR>> >>>a Brushfire with piped Jett 90).
<BR>> >>> <BR>> >>>I'm very comfortable with pattern
as it is - however, there is a gap <BR>> >>>between <BR>>
>>>current pattern and SPA that many seem interested in. <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>>Earl <BR>> >>> ----- Original
Message ----- <BR>> >>> From: Koenig, Tom <BR>> >>>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <BR>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 03,
2007 7:16 PM <BR>> >>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller
Models <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>>
Guys-there are many of us that reminisce about the 'simpler' days of
<BR>> >>> the <BR>> >>>60 size models, even down
here! <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> I mentioned recently to
some locals that I may hold a comp similar to <BR!>> &
gt;>>your <BR>> >>>SPA stuff. I considered just allowing
60 size models as a max, never mind <BR>> >>>all the vintage
rules etc.....I was SWAMPED with interest. There were all <BR>>
>>>sorts of ex pattern pilots ready to show up. I think I'd have
had 40 -50 <BR>> >>>possible entries!!! <BR>> >>>
<BR>> >>> Not trying to stir things up-but it is interesting
nonetheless. <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> Tom <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> -----Original Message----- <BR>>
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <BR>>
>>>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
Ron <BR>> >>>Lockhart <BR>> >>> Sent: Thursday, 4
January 2007 11:31 AM <BR>> >>> To: NSRCA Mailing List <BR>>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> <BR>> >&g! t;> Yea, smaller
has a number of advantages. <BR>> >>> A reduction in money,
time, hassle factor, etc., of models is a <BR>> >>>thought
<BR>> >>>toward increased participation. <BR>> >>>
(Yea, I know the established pilots, and new pilots, are allowed to <BR>>
>>>fly <BR>> >>>smaller models right now. But we have a
<BR>> >>> lot of history that shows Dean's comment "Given that
everyone will <BR>> >>>build or buy up to the maximum size
limit" is true. <BR>> >>> How does that Dixie thing go?....<G>
<BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> Ron Lockhart <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- <BR>>
>>> From: Dean Pappas <BR>> >>> To: NSRCA Mailing List
<BR>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:51 PM <BR>>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >&g! t;> <BR>> >>> Hi John,
<BR>> >>> A year or so ago, I puit together an Excelleron 90 for
a review <BR>> >>> and <BR>> >>>eventual sale to a
newbie. <BR>> >>> Boy! Was it nice to drop a plane into the
minivan in one piece! <BR>> >>> It was almost as good as when a
Phoenix 8 would fit into the back <BR>> >>> of <BR>> >>
<BR>> >>>a <BR>> >>>hatchback Camaro in one piece.
<BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> Given that everyone will build
or buy up to the maximum size <BR>> >>> limit, <BR>>
>>> is there a good enough reason to push on the rules bodies to
<BR>> >>>legislate <BR>> >>>Pattern plane sizes back
down? <BR>> >>> How about 1.6 or 1.7 meters square? <BR>>
>>> Will this affect cost and complexity enough to have a
beneficial <BR>> >>>effect on participation? <BR>>
>&g! t;> Or am I just whistling Dixie? <BR>> >>>
<BR>> >>> later, <BR>> >>> Dean <BR>>
>>> Dean Pappas <BR>> >>> Sr. Design Engineer <BR>>
>>> Kodeos Communications <BR>> >>> 111 Corporate Blvd.
<BR>> >>> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 <BR>> >>>
(908) 222-7817 phone <BR>> >>> (908) 222-2392 fax <BR>>
>>> d.pappas@kodeos.com <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>>
-----Original Message----- <BR>> >>> From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org <BR>>
>>>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
John <BR>> >>>Ferrell <BR>> >>> Sent: Wednesday,
January 03, 2007 3:07 PM <BR>> >>> To: NSRCA Mailing List
<BR>> >>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> There seems to be a
growing trend toward sm! aller a irplanes among <BR>> >>> a
<BR>> >>>lot of folks. I sure am enjoying the 90 size Boxer I
bought from Ed <BR>> >>>Miller <BR>> >>>last summer.
Less hassle to transport, assemble and fly. That means I can <BR>>
>>>fly more! <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> John
Ferrell W8CCW <BR>> >>> "My Competition is not my enemy"
<BR>> >>> http://DixieNC.US <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>>
_______________________________________________ <BR>> >>>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >>>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>>**********************! *******
******************************************* <BR>> >>> *PLEASE
NOTE* This email and any attachments may <BR>> >>> be
confidential. If received in error, please delete all <BR>> >>>
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or <BR>> >>>
dissemination of this email or its attachments is <BR>> >>>
prohibited without the consent of the sender. <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>> WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep <BR>>
>>> outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
<BR>> >>> is given that this email or its attachments are virus
free. <BR>> >>> Before opening or using attachments, please
check for <BR>> >>> viruses. Our liability is limited to the
re-supply of any <BR>> >>> affected attachments. <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> Any views expressed in this message are
those of the <BR>> >>> individual s! ender, except where the
sender expressly, <BR>> >>> and with authority, states them to
be the views of the <BR>> >>> organisation. <BR>>
>>> <BR>>
>>>************************************************************************
<BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>> <BR>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>> >> --- <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>> _______________________________________________ <BR>>
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >>>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>>
>>> <BR>> >>> <BR>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>> >> ----- <BR>> >>> <BR>> >>> <BR>>
! >> ;> > _______________________________________________
<BR>> >>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>>
>>> > NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>>
>>> <BR>>
>>>_______________________________________________ <BR>>
>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>>
>>>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>>
>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<BR>> >> <BR>> >>
_________________________________________________________________ <BR>>
>> Fixing up the home? Live Search can help <BR>> >>
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=e
<BR>> >> n-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG
<BR>> >> <BR>> >>
_______________________________________________ <BR>> >>
NSRCA-discussion mailin! g list <BR>> >>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> _______________________________________________ <BR>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> <BR>> >> <BR>> >>
_______________________________________________ <BR>> >>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> >>
<BR>> >> _______________________________________________ <BR>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> >
<BR>> > _________________________! _______ _______________ <BR>>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> >
<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > -- <BR>> > No virus found in
this incoming message. <BR>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition. <BR>>
> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.5/616 - Release Date:
1/4/2007 <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> <BR>>
_______________________________________________ <BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list <BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion </BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition.<BR>Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.5/616 - Release Date:
1/4/2007<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>