<div>Ed,</div> <div>Sounds like a great idea to me.</div> <div> </div> <div>Tommy S<BR><BR><B><I>Ed Deaver <divesplat@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"> <DIV>Now the ball is rolling on judging, I have another subject worth discussion. Not sure it has been actually.</DIV> <DIV>At N Dallas 2 weeks ago, a midair occurred. Here is the scenario.</DIV> <DIV>Both pilots were flying on the same track, but spread apart. On an endbox manuever, both pulled vertical and both held their nerve(to their credit) It appeared one plane was inside the other. Suddenly plane #1 pulled to complete his 1/2 square (which appeared inside plane #2) when #2 cut it in 1/2 and flew through it.</DIV> <DIV>My question is:</DIV> <DIV>Can pattern effectively begin or have an "avoidance" rule. These 2 planes were so close had one just pulled the power
back a little, let the other one go on, $6K would still be flying. I realize some overzelous competitors would use this indescretionately, but still we could write in some wording indicating judges had to agree it was in the best interest of both pilots. As well no change to distance out could occur (not making it a positioning advantage)</DIV> <DIV>Any thoughts on this one.</DIV> <DIV>Ed</DIV>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> 
<hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br> Everyone is raving about the <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42297/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta"> all-new Yahoo! Mail.</a>