<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=468273619-02102006><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>I got replies that, when I asked about flying speed,
stated that flying speed was judgeable because of the smoothness and
gracefullness aspect of the rules. How they got speed from that line I don't
know. </FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>DaveL322@comcast.net<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 02, 2006 2:56
PM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Wind correction scoring<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>John,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I couldn't agree more, and I'd like to see "smoothness and gracefullness"
completely removed as a judging criteria as no one has ever been able to
quantify what the downgrade should be, or how a geometrically perfect
maneuver can be outscored by a more "graceful" maneuver.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Standing by with a bucket of water...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Dave Lockhart</DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:DaveL322@comcast.net">DaveL322@comcast.net</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>From: "John Ferrell"
<johnferrell@earthlink.net> <BR>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For that reason I believe the word "Graceful"
should be removed from the rule book in every instance. Even dictionaries have
trouble defining "Graceful". </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>That ought to draw a little fire.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>John Ferrell W8CCW<BR>"My Competition is not my
enemy"<BR><A href="http://dixienc.us/">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=DaveL322@comcast.net
href="mailto:DaveL322@comcast.net">DaveL322@comcast.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 02, 2006 10:57
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Wind
correction scoring</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Many good points already made, and good technical discussions
presented.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The distinction between textbook technical judging and non-textbook
"impression" judging will always exist, and I think (as most if not all) we
should strive to eliminate the impression judging whenever possible.
For that reason, I would opposed to an "artistic" or "overall" flight score
which could be an opening for a very subjective score which is markedly
contrasting to the objective scoring/goal on which pattern is based.
It takes a lot of effort make a well designed schedule which
is technically well executed look unappealing.</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Dave Lockhart</DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:DaveL322@comcast.net">DaveL322@comcast.net</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>From: Rcmaster199@aol.com <BR>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR>
<DIV>
<DIV>To Ed's point, If the model flies a technically correct maneuver in
heavy wind, few judges are desciplined enough to really judge only the
technical merit, as per the book. Most will also see the strange attitudes
the model must endure even if track was correct, particularly when
properly compensating for said wind, and take off points for smoothness
and grace. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Throw in slower flight which is the present norm especially with
e-flight, and the issue can get exacerbated. Faster flight regime in heavy
wind will tend to mask wind compensation.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>There have been many superb flights that were wind corrected
extremely well to deserved high scores. The Nats is often the place since
it is usually so windy and demands some superb performances. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>However, two stick out in my mind, performed in
relatively obscure local contests.... Ivan Kristensen in Jacksonville
a bunch of years ago, and Pete Collinson in Ocala just a couple years ago.
Both contests were held early in the season and anyone who has spent any
time in Florida will know how windy the early season can be there. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Both explained that they essentially "flew the wind". Ivan added that
he flew "b..ls to the wall...". Pete did also except his model was set-up
for only moderately fast speed, which caused the
perennial F3A winner in FLA at the time to exclaim
"...well, if you're gonna get beat, might as well be by the best.."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Judging Pattern fairly and consistently is tough needless to say,
particularly in difficult conditions. To Earl's point, Technical Merit and
Artistic Merit are combined in our present mode of judging. Perhaps
we may want to separate them, as done in other similar
sports.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Matt</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 9/30/2006 7:04:05 AM Eastern Standard Time,
ehaury@houston.rr.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ed</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'll always score the technically correct
higher!! </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As a judge I just am amazed at the folks
that will wind correct properly on uplines and simply disregard it on
downlines - totally destroying a good score. Unfortunately - some judges
still can't get past the ugly, the only sure way around this is to score
with some sort of machine. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It takes a lot of practice to develop a
"feel" for the wind so as to recognize just what / how much to
compensate. Often the pilot requires several maneuvers to get this feel
in a competition flight - the judges instantly see the results. The
latter may be why some feel wind corrected maneuvers don't score well -
it's easy for the judge to see and hard to fly correctly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>How about some technical discussion of wind
correcting - we're drawing maneuvers in a moving medium (air) that
affects the trajectory of our machine (airplane). Does speed really help
- other than shortening the time exposure? Is slower better - gives more
time to correctly apply thrust vector "against" the wind? Uplines take
some (x) power in calm, additional power is needed for the wind vector
(y), how much y to maintain x in calm? Steve's point - downlines are
affected by the same wind as uplines, gravity usually is used for x -
won't y thrust (adding power) improve downline attitude in wind? Can
power be added for y without helping gravity too much (downline
speed)?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Earl</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mailto:divesplat@yahoo.com
href="mailto:divesplat@yahoo.com">Ed Deaver</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 29, 2006
9:48 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Wind correction</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Thanx Ken, but which would you score
higher?? I know what we are supposed to do, but that is the jist
of my post. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Ed<BR><BR><B><I>Ken Thompson <<A
title=mailto:mrandmrst@comcast.net
href="mailto:mrandmrst@comcast.net">mrandmrst@comcast.net</A>></I></B>
wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hard to ignore "ugly", but you need to
judge the "track"</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mailto:divesplat@yahoo.com
href="mailto:divesplat@yahoo.com">Ed Deaver</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing
List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 29,
2006 9:13 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [NSRCA-discussion]
Wind correction</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Hey everyone. While the season is
winding down, Don Ramsey and I had an interesting discussion this
past weekend. Am wondering what the general consensus
is.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>First, let me state, judges are human and I
understand that. Also, many judges don't know the exact
wording of many rules, I understant that also.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Soooo</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Will a pilot score higher if they follow the
letter of the law and wind correct perfectly, but fly an ugly
manuever, or wind correct a little and let the plane look
"prettier" in a manuever?????</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Lets use the first maneuver in the Master's
sequence after entering the box. Stall turn 1 1/4 rolls up,
3/4 rolls down exit inverted. On a strong wind day, not
pulling to vertical to maintain the line doesn't look to bad (we
expect that) the 1 1/4 rolls in centered, looking good,
appropriate rudder is given to maintain a straight vertical line
(again expected and usually doesn't require much as we are at full
throttle), the stall goes off without a hitch, but do to lack of
airspeed we cant the fuse and hold rudder into the wind letting
the fuse lean at a 45degree angle to maintain a straight line
(this is the part I'm curious about) until the 3/4 roll and using
a little down elevator to hold the line after the roll (again
expected but not ugly)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Everything about this manuever is done and
doesn't detract from the overall appearance of the manuever except
the down line after the stall, which is simply "UGLY"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Just curious what everyone says.
Again, I know what the rules say, and am not interested in a rule
book interpretation, but what do you think about scoring better vs
worse???</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Thanx</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT
face=Arial>ed</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>